I have, quite seriously, rarely encountered a wider gap between pretension and reality. even @elonmusk seems more grounded at times.
~Mona
laughter aside...this is a serious issue. @walterkirn and @mtaibbi are but a symptom of a profound *sickness* in Western #journalism, a sickness whose ultimate cause can only be #capitalism—which rewards mediocrity and unfounded egotism in its systems of leadership.
~Mona
Kirn and Taibbi might as well be "Peter Principle" #management and #executive persons—people who have their lofty positions not because of *skill* but superior social privilege, and because they're more ruthless and cynical in their dealings with other people.
~Mona
it's one reason that punditocrats like @mtaibbi and @walterkirn are puerile and snide on the subject of ethics and morality: in order to get their elite "influencer" status, it's likely that they've betrayed and backstabbed a lot of colleagues. these people make *enemies*.
~Mona
and the more openly bıgoted they are, the more enemies they make. @mtaibbi needs to conceal the full depths of his spiritual and moral (and intellectual) corruption for a good reason: he's seen more explicitly racist scribblers like @bariweiss and @sullydish get *exiled*.
~Mona
@mtaibbi, @bariweiss, &c. flatter themselves by thinking it's "censorship", as if they were special ideological targets. in truth it's because dedicated bıgots are also dedicated jerkasses, and nobody wants to work with a bıgoted jerkass. so, they languish at @SubstackInc.
~Mona
and @mtaibbi &c. feel very ill used, very much like they've been robbed of fame and wealth that they feel *entitled* to grabbing—at bottom, all of these "influencers" are very childlike and spoiled, just like Taibbi's hero @elonmusk has been spoiled by money and privilege.
~Mona
THAT is mainly why @walterkirn and @mtaibbi are clinging desperately to the illusion that they're fearless leaders of some sort of independent rebellion, when they're merely pawns in a murky political conspiracy with @elonmusk and unseen Republican political figures.
~Mona
@walterkirn &c. are tenth-raters who feel entitled to a place at the top, and as long as they're not in the top rank, they feel like outsiders. and they really want to pretend that their mere social-climbing ways are, somehow, *rebellious*. it's very very silly.
our partner and best friend @KaylinEvergreen, to whom we feel we owe so much—we've benefited from the keenness of her mind; she "keeps it real" for us, and we *need* such tethering—doesn't like someone we talk frequently about, and that's the Christian celebrity, #CSLewis.
(1/x)
unfortunately, the Pnictogen Wing feels that it's got plenty of unfinished business with C. S. Lewis—"Jack" Lewis, to friends—because Lewis played a pivotal role in our lives. we rebounded from the disastrous 1992-4 mistake that was attending @Caltech towards #CSLewis.
(2/x)
we had caught a lucky break: our very first taste of C. S. Lewis wasn't something obvious. it wasn't the #Narnia books, which we didn't read until our mid-20s. it wasn't "The Screwtape Letters" or "Miracles" or any other of the famed Christian apologetic writings of Lewis.
we've experienced *that* tiresome person—the person who has extremely particular opinions and *rankings* about every single little thing, and who exhibits this snobbery as proof of superior intellect.
@antoniogm wrote (maybe) that he treated people like game entities.
(2/x)
people were more valuable to @antoniogm, or less valuable—that's what Sr. García Martínez said in his book "Chaos Monkeys", anyway...
...maybe. thanks to the practices of #capitalism and publication for profit, the true authorship of any book must always be in some doubt.
the last twenty or thirty years have seen a remarkable intellectual phenomenon: #computer technicians, people whose sole area of expertise is computer #programming and #software engineering and other related disciplines, have come to be regarded as "Renaissance Men".
(1/x)
the "#STEM Lord" is an artifact of this phenomenon. while "STEM" is supposed to comprise mathematics and engineering and mathematics, the typical "STEM Lord" is not well-versed in any of these things—the typical "STEM Lord" is in #computers. they are a *technician*.
(2/x)
that is to say, #computer professionals are people with *limited* educations, who are devoted solely to mastering the intricacies of a certain sort of machinery, namely the modern computer.
of *course* @sama's fake ChatGPT miracle relies upon an army of underpaid workers just out of sight! of _course_ it does! this is the work of modern #programmers, people without any known sense of ethics—and people stupid enough to believe their own lies.
the corporate #AI debacle deserves a proper dissection. the situation is appalling: people like @sama and @demishassabis make promises about their marvellous universal thinking machines that are *just shy* of outright fraud. and they program the machines with their own inanity.
that's the real problem here: @sama and @fchollet and all the other computer technicians who make grandiose promises and proclamations about #AI and "intelligence" are, to put the matter bluntly, completely incompetent at judging *anyone's* intellect, least of all their own.
ah, here it is! we were trying to remember this: the tweet in which @fchollet eloquently demonstrated their incompetence at understanding how perception works, on a fundamental level.
this mountebank thinks that expectation precedes perception.
to put it more bluntly, @fchollet thinks that perceiving things starts with knowing what you want to perceive first. there's a word for this sort of perception: it's called BIAS. Chollet has, in his tweet, described *perceptual bias*: applying filters to one's perceptions.
(2/x)
why would @fchollet make such an elementary blunder? well, likely Chollet (in common with most #computer professionals these days) is hideously biased about most things. the high-tech field, especially in the higher echelons of management, is sodden with bias and bıgotry.
we in the Pnictogen Wing are perhaps nearly alone in thinking that "flat-Earth" people, i.e. human beings who cling to the notion that the Earth is not a spheroid but instead a disc, are not totally pointless.
flat-Earthers are, for most of Western society, safe targets.
(1/x)
for that reason alone, we are drawn to try understanding the phenomenon better, rather than simply discard flat-Earthism and its adherents as worthless and laughable.
what drives a person to endorse such a quixotic worldview, one that insures their permanent ostracism?
(2/x)
there's emotional benefits to belonging in a mostly-despised faction, of course. the faction experiences so much pressure from outside, the society *inside* the bubble is practically forced to be orderly and well-disclipined—a safe haven from an otherwise chaotic world.