Thread by @LevinaNeythiri

1/6
Pls read complete thread. 🙏
This misleading report which claims India lost access to 26 PATROLLING POINTS along #LAC will hurt Indian PM #Modi a lot more than #BBC PROPAGANDA.

Everyone who read it, believed it‼️
Theres no way to VERIFY THIS.👎

Here’s the reality:

2/6 The report is made believable by including the name of the #IPS officer who claims 26 patrolling points hv restricted or no patrolling. Its so BELIEVABLE that anyone who reads it will believe it. 👎Most MEDIA house published it with same title— NDTV,Hindu, Indian Express 👇

3/5 What is the reality❓
1️⃣ There are many ppl in Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Defence who love generating CONTROVERSIES‼️

“Sarkar Modi ki hai par system hamara hai”.

As a veteran told me— lot of #LeLis exist in MHA & MoD. But issue doesn’t end there.

4/5 Unfortunately theres an unresolved problem #ITBP & #IndianArmy.
ITBP has lost access to many of its patrolling points, which have slowly been taken over by Army.
Somewhere deep down in the report this has been mentioned, but agains words are misleading. 👇

5/6 A similar issue exists all along the LAC and in NE borders controlled by Assam Rifles. #IndianArmy has cleared “No pasture land lost, area has more control than earlier if not MORE”. 👇 But the article still gives more credibility to the IPS officer’s version.

6/6 Report hs bn written so beautifully that it misleads ppl into believing INDIAN ARMY is readying to give away land to CHINA. 🙄👎 Article itself says #IntelligenceBureau’s meeting with PM #Modi didn’t consider this report by IPS. 🔴Reason: they know the complete truth 😊

I usually do not include words like: read complete thread, URGENT or breaking news in my tweets. I leave it to ppl to read and react. But this time I want the narrative created by HINDU’s article to be decimated. BRACE UP‼️More such vague & misleading articles r coming our way.

Pls go ahead read the report again, now you will know what I mean. The truth is there but it doesn’t get credence in the article.

IB didnt include the paper by IPS in meeting with PM. Ss! 👇

Tagging @Rajeev_GoI Sir! Ideally a rejected research paper should not have been an issue at all. But media has given credence to the paper rejected by Intelligence bureau. This article has been published by multiple media houses. Just bringing this to your notice. 👆