Erik Zimerman Profile picture
Feb 2 12 tweets 5 min read
#Russian sources have released this striking video purported to be of an S-300 AA battery being destroyed around Kreminna (a front I wish to update about shortly). I however have geolocated it to Lisa Stinka
aout 70km from the Kreminna front line. The S-300 is a very powerful proven anti air system. If the video is indeed new, the relative ease in which the RU UAV is flying over enemy territory to direct a strike on a S-300 (can't verify that but it does look like it) battery deep
behind enemy lines is further proof of the growing confidence and proficiency of of RU forces in the air. #Ukraine started out the war with up to 100 S-300 systems, though most were likely in a bad state of disrepair and many have been destroyed. However, a core group of working
batteries escaped the initial (botched) RU strike and prevented RU air superiority over most of Ukraine for most of this war. The fewer and fewer working systems have been quite dear to Ukraine as even the donation from Slovakia of one working battery was seen as a significant
event. Obviously, Russian local superiority over this sparsely defended (on both sides) front only improved after this successful strike. It is here on the Kharkov oblast front that RU is steadily pushing back UA forces towards the Oskil river and the critical hub of Kupyansk
lost earlier in the war during the Lugansk front collapse. This front remains the most dangerous for Russia due to its great length and low density of troops. RU relies to a large extent on early detection of UA advances & subsequent artillery and air superiority to thwart them.
UA forces are attempting to probe around weak points and cause chaos in the RU rear as they did to great effect previously. So far it is not working due to the vastly increased RU numbers in the front, albeit still small, and lessons learned in holding this type of line including
greater depth, and increased detection capabilities. Will discuss this front further later, but note (here w the DAP map) the strike location behind the front line and in fact behind the river as well. Also note the location of the previously destroyed bridge at Senkove, the
first crossing south of Kupyansk which the UA forces are likely using as a supply hub for their advance east of the river. It has thus been a target for RU shelling in recent days as RU forces attempt to force UA forces back across the river or at least keep them from advancing
here themselves while the critical battles of the south play out. Conversely it behooves UA to invest as many forces in this front quickly where it can cause severe blows to RU plans as we have seen rather than sacrifice troops defending land that it cannot. UA command has
drastically in this regard since earlier in the war, but it still remains committed to holding land at any price and worse many manpower wasting (& often fantastical) operations. It still has not learned to respect its troops & their lives, especially it DRGs and special units,
which it launches nearly daily on implausible if not suicidal missions all over the fronts in search of PR victories. The further loss of local air superiority that this video demonstrates bodes even less well for them now.

#RussiaUkraineWar #UkraineWar

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erik Zimerman

Erik Zimerman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZimermanErik

Feb 3
Following up on the Kreminna forest front. I believe it is critical for #Russian forces to seal off the length of the forest belt along the Siverskyi river. To do to this southern forest flank precisely what they were not able to do to the western flank of the Izium forest belt
a few months back (and as discussed in the quoted previous post). So this is what we are talking about, a combination of complex river system (Siverskyi Donets) or alluvial plain with natural dense forests, and a wider managed forestry plantation. Russia has been able to hold Image
Dobrova (which was key), and edges of the forest south of Kreminna. Torske and Zarichne are held by UA forces easily supplied from a build up in Lyman. However, with Dibrova in RU hands, UA forces are using river crossings in the south from the Siversk front to greatly multiply
Read 19 tweets
Feb 3
We now get to discuss the #Kreminna front finally. In light red (DPA map)we see very roughly future likely #Russian lines of advance around #Bakhmut & #Siversk. Hope to discuss those again in detail but for now let us assume these involve an operational encirclement of Bakhmut Image
(followed by a total one) and an advance on Siversk by hitting the strong eastern UA line from the rear, and advancing northwards along the high ground. This would push the front to the final Donbass line of defense, the formidable Kostyanivka - Slovansk line. The menacing
creature to the Russian effort is the often ignored Kreminna front, especially its thick forest belt. It is here where UA forces can leverage their preference for forest cover and assault the less densely defended northern/Kharkhov front, where they made such large gains a few
Read 17 tweets
Feb 1
Part II

The second reason for the partial failure of the first RU attack was I believe, not attacking the coal mine to the NE first. Let me summarize. #Russian forces including Marines from the Baltic Fleet surged out of Pavlivka and Mykil's'ke and converged on the residential
sector that was still UA held. Before fully securing the area (there were reports of local firefights with pockets of UA troops trapped behind RU lines persisted for about 1.5 days) RU troops surged northwards towards #Vuhledar. They secured most of the eastern dacha area &
reached the outskirts of Vuhledar itself. There were reports of fighting in the eastern sector around the pumping station. It seems RU forces gained a foothold in the town. I believe they wanted to proceed to surround it rather than press the assault further (second image).
Read 14 tweets
Feb 1
Very interesting battle happening at Vuhledar (Ugledar). The #Russians have recently clearly improved their field maneuverability and have been showing a greater preference for envelopment, and encirclement over frontal artillery grind. This has also significantly reduced their
daily shell consumption. In any event, #Vuhledar is an unusual town in this war. The town lies in a very flat (even for Ukraine) part of the country. However, this coal "boom" town is filled with high density buildings, the type that we have seen make capture by RU very difficult
& preferred defense areas for UA forces, especially in winter. The small but dense town is highly strategic for several reasons. Among them is that this fortress town is what protects the UA bulge threatening a key railway. Much has been made of the Crimea - Donetsk land bridge
Read 13 tweets
Jan 12
Lots of folks excited today about the classified documents found at #Biden's think tank, so let us chime in.

Firstly, the response ought not to be that the FBI should raid Biden's home as well (for this), but that #Trump's should not have.
The right ought to be against the politicization of law enforcement and prosecution, as opposed to favoring its use against the left.

The right should want to return to a freer and more constitutional state, rather than a banana republic and police state where those in power
currently put those out of power in prison, as is the case in much of the world.

If the point is to show the double standard of the media, and the alarming & ruthless bias against conservatives which permeate the government bureaucracies, including the DOJ, then by all means.
Read 23 tweets
Jan 11
Grain Part III

During the 1971 India-Pakistan war, India gained naval superiority and blockaded the coast of East-Pakistan (now Bangladesh). During the decade long "Tanker War", Iran blockaded Iraq in 1986 when they captured the Al-Faw peninsula. This allowed them to blockade
all shipping in and out of the Shatt al-Arab, the confluence of the famous Tigris and Eupharates rivers that empties into the Persian Gulf. Iraq became virtually landlocked and required access to the sea through Kuwait and Jordan. By 1988, Iraq had pushed the rapidly collapsing
Iranians back and regained access (though still somewhat restricted) to the sea.

Since then, the US has used ever more frequent exclusion zones, including "Anti-Terror" Zones, "Defensive Sea Bubbles" which move along with her forces, and more. In fact, for the US, Naval blockade
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(