Justice KM Joseph: Centre has to do something so that this does not happen
SG: When secular state does this then freedom of speech petitions will flood the country
SG: If someone is prevented to voice their view then there will be prevention of Article 19(1)(a) ...barring law and order situation
SC: Did they get permission to hold meeting?
SG: they did not..
SC: Then how can they hold meeting..
SG: No they cannot
SG: The court has to be very careful in a pre-censorship order..
Justice JB Pardiwala: we may be reluctant to grant a relief that this procession is not held.. but it should be ensured that during this rally no rash statements are made and steps are taken and vigil is kept
SG: The petitioner is from Kerala.. how will they know about speeches made in Maharashtra
Justice Pardiwala: let the authority take a call..
SG: To get a speech vetted before being spoken may not be possible
Justice Joseph: see what happened in Uttarakhand and then state took action. If there is a replica of what happened then we cannot allow this.. please read what is written
SG: Yes it is distasteful
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: distasteful is not the word #hatespeech
SG: If hate speech is made then action will be taken..
SC: We will say that if anyone makes hate speech in defiance of law then action shall be taken #hatespeech
Sibal: last Sunday only statements were made by the MLA.. the same Hindu Samaj is holding the event...
SG: They do not want pre-censorship but also pre-arrest...
Sibal: When permission is granted they should look at what happened last Sunday and even then if permission is given then fine I will not stand in the way. Permission given should also be video recorded
SG: My public spirited petitioner can record !
SG: your lordships would be pre-judging if you say this. this forum is being misused. we are also not expressing many things. #hatespeech
SC: We will add that officers will mindful of their duties and powers while granting the permission. Videography also we will allow.
SG: Whatever to be required before granting permission will be given..
SC: who will videograph this?
SG: let the public spirited person do it who abuse the jurisdiction of this court. there is tehseen poonawalla case guidelines are there and now selective cases are being filed here and can this august forum be abused like this
Justice Joseph: this is because we are the only constitutional forum
SG: This does not justify people coming selectively
1. we record submission of SG Mehta that if permission is applied for Sakaal Hindu Samaj for holding the apprehended meeting on 5.2.2023, and if permission granted.. it will be subject to condition that nobody will make any hate speech
1. ..in defiance of law and in violation of public order 2. Sr Adv Sibal drew our attention to Section 151 CrPC
SC: 3. in case permission is granted and in case power under 151 crpc power is invoked... it will be the duty of the police to invoke the power and act under the mandate of the section #supremecourt#hatespeech
SC: 4. having regard to what happened on January 29, the meeting may be videographed and the same shall be presented to the Supreme Court. We accept this request as well. #supremecourt#hatespeech
SC: SG Mehta pointed out that powers of police will not be confined to 151 crpc and be in accordance with law. #supremecourt#hatespeech
SG: i am thankful that there are no prayers that the speeches made be vetted first by them (petitioners) ! #hatespeech
SC: We direct that the videography of the event is conducted under the supervision of the police inspector of the concerned area and submitted to the #Supremecourt#hatespeech
Sibal: they may change the date of the event.
SG: Every apprehension like this cannot be looked into by the court
SC: SG Mehta assures that a statement will be filed on what transpired during January 29, 2023 #hatespeech
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions concerning delay by Central Government in clearing names as High Court and SC judges after being cleared by #Collegium
Attorney-General of India R. Venkataramani had told the Supreme Court that the Union government will adhere to the timelines fixed by the court to process recommendations for judicial appointments #collegium#SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt to hear petitions challenging the Union Govt's decision to block the controversial BBC documentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and 2002 Gujarat riots #BBCDocumentary@BBC
Advocate ML Sharma has challenged the ban as "malafide, arbitrary, and unconstitutional" #BBCDocumentary#SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt will also hear plea by Advocate Prashant Bhushan, Trinamool Congress Member of Parliament (MP) Mahua Moitra and journalist N Ram have challenging Central government orders to block the #BBCDocumentary@pbhushan1@MahuaMoitra@nramind
Hansaria: advertisements are to be approved by govt. When the HC sent it to govt. like Bihar and Tamil Nadu.. the files only move to and fro.. then some HC has a problem of evaluation and then finally is funding for infrastructure
Hansaria: 60 crore under central scheme has to be disbursed for Orissa. problem is after it is disbursed there is an issue of utilisation.. so a nodal agency has to take stock of it..
#SupremeCourt is hearing plea by BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay @AshwiniUpadhyay seeking to restrict people from contesting election for the same office from two constituencies simultaneously
Sr Adv Gopal S appears for Upadhyay
CJI DY Chandrachud: when you contest from two seats you are not sure you will be elected from both the seats...this is done for a variety of reasons.. what is wrong about it? this is political democracy.. #supremecourt
Justice PS Narasimha: what is unconstitutional about it?
CJI: Right to vote is a statutory right and not a constitutional right....
Gopal S: We argued this before constitution bench 2 months ago and order was reserved #supremecourt
SG Tushar Mehta: CARA has a process who decides which family can adopt. But there is a couple who is ready and willing to adopt the child and the child will get excellent upbringing. I am not disclosing their name #supremecourt
SG: The prospective parents have already registered with CARA.
Kappan, a reporter for Malayalam news portal Azhimukham, and secretary of the Delhi unit of the Kerala Union of Working Journalists (KUWJ), was arrested along with three others in UP, while on his way to Hathras to report on the gang-rape and murder of a 19-year-old Dalit girl.
He was then booked under the UAPA and later under the PMLA.
In the UAPA case, he was denied bail by lower courts and the Allahabad High Court, before the top court granted him relief in August 2022.