The truth is nobody wins in wars except the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex and the #WarMachine financing banking systems sucking in billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of weapons manufacturers, infra builders and corrupt politicians.
China 🇨🇳 is shining green lasers down to Earth from space from their own satellites, this was near Hawaii
Are we entering the age of #StarWars
now that terrestrial wars are boring🤷♂️
#Ukranian channels celebrating use of chemical weapons on #Russian soldiers. After release of the phosgene canister the soldiers appear to have spasms and neurological complications and eventually die.
The U.S. military suffered a staggering 25% enrollment deficit last year. This is not surprising: young Americans do not want to risk their lives for a country they’re taught to be ashamed of.
Listening to this #Warmonger John Bolton talk about Russia Ukraine was because of Ukraine not joining NATO sooner… WTF, it’s people like these that destroy world peace and they want an endless war from our… #MilitaryIndustrialComplex
There’s never a war in history that Hillary Clinton hasn’t loved. She’d love to be the commander in chief when the trigger needs to be pushed for a #NuclearWar#WWIII
ENTIRE UKRAINE WAR FUNDING IS A MASSIVE COVERUP & CLEANUP OP
Do you know the reasons why US is so adamant in helping Ukraine with 100s of billions of dollars and weapons aid, it’s more than just helping the poor people of Ukraine. It’s to protect themselves from biological… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Then along came Seymour Hersh with an article detailing US involvement in blowing up the Nordstream pipelines. EU and the western NATO allies are still not investigating these war crimes
Q: Did you just fire $400,000 missiles at $12 local hobby club balloons
A: No… we made sure to attach Chinese tags to the balloons 🎈 😂
Seymour Hersh one of the best reporter with journalistic integrity in the world reports that USA blew Nordstream pipelines with help from Norway and the EU is totally silent.
Ukraine's Zelenskyy: "If China allies itself with Russia, there will be a world war."
What Zelensky fails to understand is the seeds of #WWIII have already been sowed by USA & NATO when they blew up #NordStream pipelines. Ukraine is a collateral damage in this proxy war with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Do you know the real reason why Vladimir Putin has wide support in Russia?
After the fall of Soviet Union, there was rampant corruption, chaos, death and destruction everywhere. The entire society crumbled in Russia. Putin was seen as a strong leader who … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional leaders and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ELON MUSK IS A CHAMPION OF FREE SPEECH THROUGH X AND THEY HATE ELON MUSK FOR IT BECAUSE THEY CANNOT CONTROL THE NARRATIVES
Elon Musk's acquisition and rebranding of Twitter to X has not only transformed the platform's identity but also its role in global discourse, particularly in how it challenges establishment narratives. Through X, Musk has positioned himself as a champion of free speech, often clashing with regulatory bodies, governments, and judicial systems over what he perceives as overreaches in controlling information. This stance has led to numerous conflicts, most notably with Brazilian Judge Alexandre de Moraes, highlighting Musk's commitment to allowing a broad spectrum of voices on the platform. This approach has made X a battleground for free speech, where Musk's decisions to reinstate previously banned accounts or resist content moderation requests are seen by some as defending the right to express diverse opinions, thereby exposing truths that might otherwise be suppressed by more conventional media or governmental controls.
The establishment's discomfort with X under Musk's leadership stems largely from this very commitment to unfettered speech. Musk's public feuds, like his labeling of Judge Moraes as dictatorial for attempting to regulate content on X, illustrate his broader critique of how power structures might use legal or regulatory frameworks to stifle dissent or alternative viewpoints. This dynamic has turned X into a platform where the establishment's narratives are frequently challenged, not just through policy but through the very content that users, encouraged by Musk's policies, are willing to post. This environment brings to light truths or perspectives that might be sidelined in more controlled media environments, thereby making X a unique arena for uncovering what might be considered hidden or inconvenient truths by those in power.
Democrats saw this chart and they said they wanted this badly… NOW
The "Great Replacement Theory" in America — there's a deliberate effort by liberal elites and political groups to demographically alter the country, replacing the white population with non-white immigrants. This shift is orchestrated to change the political landscape, ensuring a voter base more aligned with leftist policies.
The Clinton family, particularly Bill and Hillary Clinton, have been at the center of numerous corruption allegations throughout their political careers, with the Clinton Foundation often at the heart of these controversies. The foundation, established by Bill Clinton in 1997, has been criticized for its financial dealings, especially during Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. Critics argue that the foundation's acceptance of donations from foreign governments and entities might have influenced U.S. policy decisions, suggesting a quid pro quo where donors gained access or favorable treatment in exchange for their contributions. This perception was fueled by investigations and reports, like those mentioned in the Durham report, which highlighted the FBI's interest in the foundation's activities, although these probes did not result in charges against the Clintons.
Moreover, the Clintons' involvement in various scandals, from Whitewater to Travelgate, has painted a picture of a family entangled in corruption. The Whitewater scandal involved allegations of fraudulent land deals, while Travelgate saw the controversial firing of the White House Travel Office staff, actions that critics argue were motivated by personal gain or retribution. These incidents, combined with the foundation's activities, have led to a narrative of systemic corruption within the Clinton family's operations, where personal enrichment and political influence are seen as intertwined. Despite investigations, the definitive proof of criminal wrongdoing directly linking the Clintons to these allegations has been elusive, yet the shadow of these controversies continues to influence public and political discourse around their legacy.
In the year 2035, the digital landscape had evolved into a meticulously controlled environment, where the boundaries of free speech were redefined by the newly established Meme Regulation Authority (MRA). This Orwellian entity was tasked with monitoring, censoring, and prosecuting any digital content deemed subversive or offensive under the guise of protecting societal harmony. A Canadian woman named Elise, an unassuming graphic designer with a penchant for satirical humor, found herself at the center of this storm. One evening, after posting a meme that cleverly critiqued the government's latest surveillance policy, her life took an unexpected turn. The meme, which depicted a dystopian version of Canada where citizens were monitored by drones, went viral overnight. However, its spread was cut short when the MRA flagged it for "undermining state stability." Before dawn, Elise was awakened not by her alarm but by the sound of her door being forcefully opened by agents of the MRA, who arrested her under the newly enacted Digital Expression Act.
Elise's trial became a spectacle, not just for its novelty but for the chilling effect it had on digital expression across the nation. The courtroom was a blend of old-world justice and new-world surveillance, with screens displaying real-time analysis of public sentiment towards the trial. Prosecutors argued that Elise's meme could incite rebellion, citing its potential to influence thoughtcrime—a term borrowed from Orwell's "1984" but now legally recognized. Her defense, limited by the very laws she was accused of violating, struggled to argue the value of satire in a free society. The judge, after a deliberation that seemed more like a formality, sentenced Elise to three years in a reeducation facility, where she would be "reintegrated" into society with a corrected understanding of humor and loyalty to the state. The case set a precedent, chilling the once vibrant meme culture of Canada, where every share, like, or comment was now weighed against the specter of the MRA's watchful eye.
In the year 2034, the world had become a tapestry of surveillance and control, where the lines between freedom and oppression blurred into a dystopian reality. Four friends, each residing in a different corner of the Anglosphere—Britain, Canada, France, and Australia—had unknowingly become the epicenter of a new form of governmental scrutiny.
The meme in question was simple yet potent: a cartoon depicting government officials as puppets, strings pulled by unseen hands, with the caption "Who's really in charge?" It went viral overnight, spreading like wildfire across social platforms, resonating with a public increasingly disillusioned with their leaders.
🚩Britain: In a quaint London flat, Tom was enjoying his morning tea when a knock echoed through his home. Opening the door, he found two officers in plain clothes, their badges gleaming under the overcast sky. "Mr. Tomlinson, we're from the Meme Regulation Unit. We need to discuss your online activity regarding a certain meme."
🚩Canada: Across the Atlantic, in Toronto, Sarah was woken by a similar intrusion. "Ms. Harper, we've traced IP addresses linked to the meme's origin. You're under investigation for spreading anti-government sentiment."
🚩France: In Paris, under the shadow of the Eiffel Tower, Jean was not surprised but rather resigned when the knock came. "Monsieur Dupont, we require immediate access to your digital devices. The meme you shared has been deemed a threat to national unity."
🚩Australia: In Sydney, the sun was setting when Mark's doorbell rang. "G'day, Mr. Thompson. We're here about a meme that's been causing quite a stir. We need proof you didn't create it, or evidence of who did."
Each friend, in their respective countries, faced the same ordeal. The Meme Police, a new branch of law enforcement, had been established to combat what was now legally defined as "digital subversion." They demanded logs, timestamps, and even biometric data to trace the meme's creator, arguing that such content could incite rebellion or chaos.
The friends, connected through their shared experience, realized the absurdity of their situation. They communicated covertly, using encrypted messages, discussing how their simple act of sharing a meme had turned their lives into a scene from Orwell's "1984." They pondered the irony of living in democracies where humor, once a weapon of the people, now required a license.
Their story, though fictional, served as a chilling reminder of a potential future where the line between satire and sedition could be dictated by those in power. The meme, a symbol of resistance, had inadvertently united them in a battle for digital freedom, highlighting the fragile balance between security and liberty in the digital age.
This tale, spread through whispers and encrypted channels, became a cautionary narrative of an Orwellian twist in the 21st century, where even a meme could make you an enemy of the state.