The truth is nobody wins in wars except the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex and the #WarMachine financing banking systems sucking in billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of weapons manufacturers, infra builders and corrupt politicians.
China 🇨🇳 is shining green lasers down to Earth from space from their own satellites, this was near Hawaii
Are we entering the age of #StarWars
now that terrestrial wars are boring🤷♂️
#Ukranian channels celebrating use of chemical weapons on #Russian soldiers. After release of the phosgene canister the soldiers appear to have spasms and neurological complications and eventually die.
The U.S. military suffered a staggering 25% enrollment deficit last year. This is not surprising: young Americans do not want to risk their lives for a country they’re taught to be ashamed of.
Listening to this #Warmonger John Bolton talk about Russia Ukraine was because of Ukraine not joining NATO sooner… WTF, it’s people like these that destroy world peace and they want an endless war from our… #MilitaryIndustrialComplex
There’s never a war in history that Hillary Clinton hasn’t loved. She’d love to be the commander in chief when the trigger needs to be pushed for a #NuclearWar#WWIII
ENTIRE UKRAINE WAR FUNDING IS A MASSIVE COVERUP & CLEANUP OP
Do you know the reasons why US is so adamant in helping Ukraine with 100s of billions of dollars and weapons aid, it’s more than just helping the poor people of Ukraine. It’s to protect themselves from biological… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Then along came Seymour Hersh with an article detailing US involvement in blowing up the Nordstream pipelines. EU and the western NATO allies are still not investigating these war crimes
Q: Did you just fire $400,000 missiles at $12 local hobby club balloons
A: No… we made sure to attach Chinese tags to the balloons 🎈 😂
Seymour Hersh one of the best reporter with journalistic integrity in the world reports that USA blew Nordstream pipelines with help from Norway and the EU is totally silent.
Ukraine's Zelenskyy: "If China allies itself with Russia, there will be a world war."
What Zelensky fails to understand is the seeds of #WWIII have already been sowed by USA & NATO when they blew up #NordStream pipelines. Ukraine is a collateral damage in this proxy war with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Do you know the real reason why Vladimir Putin has wide support in Russia?
After the fall of Soviet Union, there was rampant corruption, chaos, death and destruction everywhere. The entire society crumbled in Russia. Putin was seen as a strong leader who … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional leaders and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.
Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.
A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇
Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.
In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.
In the shadowed annals of empire, the invasion of Iraq revealed the blueprint: invent an existential threat, amplify it through every megaphone of power, then unleash hell under the banner of salvation. Weapons of mass destruction—those ghostly specters that never materialized—served as the perfect phantom, terrifying enough to silence dissent yet vague enough to evade accountability when the lie collapsed. The true prize was never aluminum tubes or yellowcake; it was the second-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, waiting to be liberated from a dictator and delivered into the hands of Western corporations. The war was sold as a moral crusade, but the receipts came later in the form of no-bid contracts and decades of guaranteed crude flowing through friendly pipelines.
Venezuela now stands in the crosshairs of the same script, only the boogeyman has been rebranded for a new century. Where once we feared mushroom clouds, we are now instructed to tremble before weapons of mass intoxication—tons of cocaine allegedly funneled through Caracas by a regime painted as the kingpin of global narco-terrorism. The opioid crisis ravaging American towns becomes the emotional battering ram, the humanitarian catastrophe of Venezuelan migrants the moral veneer, while the real objective glitters beneath the Orinoco Belt: the largest oil reserves on the planet, currently outside the grip of ExxonMobil and Chevron. The pattern is identical—demonize, destabilize, invade or install a compliant regime—only this time the pretext is not yellowcake but white powder, and the war will be waged not with tanks rolling across the desert but with sanctions, proxy forces, and perhaps, when the moment is ripe, a "limited intervention" to stop the drugs and secure the wells. History does not repeat; it simply changes costumes.