The truth is nobody wins in wars except the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex and the #WarMachine financing banking systems sucking in billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of weapons manufacturers, infra builders and corrupt politicians.
China 🇨🇳 is shining green lasers down to Earth from space from their own satellites, this was near Hawaii
Are we entering the age of #StarWars
now that terrestrial wars are boring🤷♂️
#Ukranian channels celebrating use of chemical weapons on #Russian soldiers. After release of the phosgene canister the soldiers appear to have spasms and neurological complications and eventually die.
The U.S. military suffered a staggering 25% enrollment deficit last year. This is not surprising: young Americans do not want to risk their lives for a country they’re taught to be ashamed of.
Listening to this #Warmonger John Bolton talk about Russia Ukraine was because of Ukraine not joining NATO sooner… WTF, it’s people like these that destroy world peace and they want an endless war from our… #MilitaryIndustrialComplex
There’s never a war in history that Hillary Clinton hasn’t loved. She’d love to be the commander in chief when the trigger needs to be pushed for a #NuclearWar#WWIII
ENTIRE UKRAINE WAR FUNDING IS A MASSIVE COVERUP & CLEANUP OP
Do you know the reasons why US is so adamant in helping Ukraine with 100s of billions of dollars and weapons aid, it’s more than just helping the poor people of Ukraine. It’s to protect themselves from biological… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Then along came Seymour Hersh with an article detailing US involvement in blowing up the Nordstream pipelines. EU and the western NATO allies are still not investigating these war crimes
Q: Did you just fire $400,000 missiles at $12 local hobby club balloons
A: No… we made sure to attach Chinese tags to the balloons 🎈 😂
Seymour Hersh one of the best reporter with journalistic integrity in the world reports that USA blew Nordstream pipelines with help from Norway and the EU is totally silent.
Ukraine's Zelenskyy: "If China allies itself with Russia, there will be a world war."
What Zelensky fails to understand is the seeds of #WWIII have already been sowed by USA & NATO when they blew up #NordStream pipelines. Ukraine is a collateral damage in this proxy war with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Do you know the real reason why Vladimir Putin has wide support in Russia?
After the fall of Soviet Union, there was rampant corruption, chaos, death and destruction everywhere. The entire society crumbled in Russia. Putin was seen as a strong leader who … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The warmongers are trying to drag us into WW3, which can only end in one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional leaders and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The failure to name, defame, indict, or arrest the clients of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sean "Diddy" Combs, despite their own high-profile arrests, points to a troubling pattern of selective accountability that protects the powerful. This seems to run across party lines, not specific to Democrat or Republican. These individuals operated within elite circles, allegedly facilitating or engaging in egregious acts of exploitation and trafficking, yet the focus remains narrowly on them as individuals rather than the broader networks they served. The clients—often wealthy, influential figures in politics, business, or entertainment—appear shielded by a system that prioritizes discretion over justice. This suggests a deliberate effort to limit exposure, perhaps to avoid destabilizing institutions or reputations tied to these networks. The lack of transparency fuels suspicion that those in power are complicit in preserving a status quo where the elite evade scrutiny, leaving only the orchestrators to face consequences while their patrons remain untouched.
This disparity in accountability undermines public trust in the justice system and perpetuates a culture of impunity for the privileged. If Epstein, Maxwell, and Combs were indeed central to criminal enterprises, their clients were not mere bystanders but active participants who enabled and benefited from these schemes. The absence of indictments or even public naming of these individuals raises questions about whether investigations are intentionally curtailed to protect those with the means to influence outcomes. Systemic barriers, such as sealed records, private settlements, or prosecutorial reluctance to challenge powerful figures, may be at play, ensuring that the client lists remain shrouded in secrecy. By failing to pursue these clients, authorities risk signaling that justice is a privilege reserved for the few, leaving victims without full reckoning and society grappling with the unsettling reality that some are above the law.
A thread on Epstein, Maxwell, Diddy and their criminal elite sex trafficking networks👇
The National Institutes of Health has shut down research labs accused of conducting deadly experiments on thousands of beagles over the past 40+ years.
EACH AND EVERY TIME GOVERNMENT TRIES TO SOLVE A PROBLEM, THEY END UP CREATING MORE
Chaos: Governments, in their attempt to impose order, often create chaos by disrupting established systems. For example, a sudden policy to nationalize industries can lead to mismanagement, supply chain breakdowns, and public unrest as businesses struggle to adapt.
Assault: Governments may use force to enforce laws, sometimes escalating to violence against citizens. For instance, during protests, police deployed by the state might use tear gas or batons, injuring peaceful demonstrators.
Theft: Through taxation or seizure, governments can take property without consent, resembling theft. An example is eminent domain, where a person's home is taken for public projects, often with inadequate compensation.
Extortion: Governments can pressure individuals or businesses for money or compliance under threat of punishment. For example, a small business might face hefty fines or closure unless it pays inflated licensing fees demanded by local officials.
Intimidation: State authorities may intimidate citizens to suppress dissent or enforce compliance. A citizen criticizing government policy online might receive threatening visits from law enforcement, discouraging free speech.
Collusion: Governments can collude with private entities to prioritize elite interests over the public. For instance, a government might award contracts to a favored corporation in exchange for political donations, sidelining fair competition.
Discrimination: Policies may unfairly target or exclude certain groups, fostering inequality. An example is a law banning specific religious practices, disproportionately harming minority communities while favoring others.
Trauma: Government actions, like forced displacements or aggressive policing, can inflict emotional and physical trauma. For example, children separated from parents during immigration enforcement may suffer long-term psychological harm.
Tyranny: Overreaching authority can lead to oppressive rule, stifling freedoms. A government imposing strict curfews and censoring media to control a crisis can erode personal liberties, resembling tyrannical rule.
Death: In extreme cases, government actions result in loss of life. For instance, a poorly planned military operation to address insurgency might lead to civilian casualties due to collateral damage.
In just three months as the 47th President, Donald Trump has governed with a ferocity that seems fueled by the trials of his past—indictments, investigations, assassination attempts, and impeachments—emerging not as a man diminished, but as one emboldened to deliver on his promises with unrelenting focus. His campaign pledges, once dismissed by critics as bombastic rhetoric, are materializing at a breakneck pace, reflecting a leader who thrives under pressure and channels adversity into action. From sweeping border security measures to economic policies aimed at revitalizing American industry, Trump’s early tenure feels like a defiant rebuttal to those who doubted his resolve, proving that the chaos of his journey has only sharpened his determination to reshape the nation in his image.
What’s most striking is how Trump has turned promises into tangible outcomes, defying the inertia that often bogs down presidencies. He’s tackled illegal immigration with a vigor that’s already shifting the landscape, while imposing tariffs to bolster domestic production, moves that echo his “America First” mantra and resonate with a base hungry for results. Gas, grocery and egg prices have eased, a practical win for everyday Americans, while his administration’s bold strokes—like dismantling bureaucratic excess and confronting global adversaries—signal a rejection of the status quo. For a man who’s faced relentless scrutiny, Trump’s first 90 days suggest not just survival, but a triumphant assertion of his vision, delivering a governance style as unapologetic and unconventional as the path that brought him back to power.