🧵THREAD: The future of our planet is at stake. Misleading information is all over the media. I am raising my voice based on my understanding from Michael Crichton's "State of Fear." In his book, he sheds light on the hazards of politicizing science. It's more topical than ever.
2/ Picture a brand new scientific idea that alerts us to an impending crisis and offers a solution. This theory quickly gains the support of media outlets, top scientists, politicians, and prominent figures across the globe.
3/ Research is supported by well-known philanthropists and conducted at esteemed universities and research centres. The crisis is frequently covered by the media and is included in the curricula of colleges and high schools.
4/ I am not talking about #COVID here. I’m talking about another theory, which rose to prominence a century ago. Its supporters included Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill. It was also approved by US Supreme Court justices, who ruled in its favour.
5/ And it wasn't just politicians who were on board, it had some of the biggest names in history supporting it too! Think of Alexander Bell or Leland Stanford, the founder of @Stanford. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, there were countless others who believed in this idea.
I always knew that @piersmorgan wasn’t the brightest star in the sky, but I didn’t expect him to be so braindead as to get an AstraZeneca booster in April ’24 and still mock vaccine critics. Time to expose that beta cuck.
🧵THREAD ⬇️⬇️⬇️
#2 When you scroll through Piers’ timeline over the last 3 years, you find nothing but hatred and scorn for critics of the plandemic. Occasionally, he has claimed to regret his tweets, but I don’t believe him. In this thread, you’ll find a best of his discriminations here on @X.
@X #3 How mentally deranged must one be to post such an incoherent tweet? He’d probably volunteer to get chipped too.
🇧🇷 For this tweet alone, @oatila should be sued into personal bankruptcy. This Brazilian influencer has not only promoted vaccines for four years and spread lies about Ivermectin and Vitamin D, but he even received money from Pfizer for it.
To my Brazilian followers: are you aware of any lawsuit against this corrupt scientist, or must I take it upon myself?
@oatila This is just one example of @oatila's content. This Instagram post, in which he falsely claims that the mRNA only stays in the muscle and that our body gets rid of the mRNA within a few days, was sponsored by Pfizer.
@oatila In this post, also sponsored by Pfizer, @oatila claims that there are side effects in only 1 out of 1 million people & that anyone who says otherwise is spreading fake news. In fact, these vaccines have increased excess mortality & cancer rates worldwide, likely killing millions.
🧵THREAD: Let's start the day with something positive: it's not the mRNA vaccines that cause increasing cancer and heart attack rates.
Thanks to our dedicated investigative mainstream media journalists, the reasons for them have finally been revealed.
Here are my TOP 20. 🍿⬇️
#1 DRUGS – The German newspaper @bzberlin is onto something very hot. The reason for the more than doubled heart problems among young Berliners is drug use, even though it has been continuously declining since the year 2000.
#2 GARDENING – The British BBC journalist and former health reporter for @TheSun, @terria_williams, reported that gardening increases the risk of a 'killer heart disease'. With this trash article, she probably recommended herself for the BBC.
🧵 THREAD: Meet @CaulfieldTim, a Canadian law professor, who continues to defend Big Pharma by claiming that Covid vaccines cannot cause cancer, labeling those who suggest otherwise as members of a "Death Cult."
However, @EthicalSkeptic demonstrates through his analyses that Caulfield's claims are incorrect. So, why does this man mislead in such an aggressive manner? FOLLOW THE MONEY, GUYS!
The evidence in the next tweet explains why he does so. In April 2020, Caulfield received $380,000 to fight Covid misinformation, and a year later, a whopping $1,750,000.
This professor isn't interested in the facts - he's a hired gun who would say anything for a price. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
#2 During Covid, Caulfield notably defamed anyone questioning Big Pharma. But should a "science communicator" act this way? Isn't the essence of science to challenge our own hypotheses and explore all possible options?
What Timothy Caulfield did was equate those distrusting Big Pharma with Holocaust deniers instead. This association was made both directly and indirectly, as he frequently used the term "denier" in numerous posts—a term often linked with Holocaust denial. He also never questioned the 'vaccines' and public measures such as 'masks' and 'lockdowns'.
Under the hashtag #ScienceUpFirst, he cherry-picked data and discredited those with differing views—all in the name of science. Timothy Caulfield has acted as a digital witch-hunter for the past four years, which I'll prove in subsequent tweets. I would strongly advise @UAlberta to consider initiating disciplinary proceedings against this "anti-science aggressor" (to borrow Caulfield's own phrasing). Otherwise, the institution may soon face scrutiny for its continued association with someone who appears to be an overtly unscientific propagandist.
#3 Half a year ago, on August 22nd, @CaulfieldTim made a post. He claimed that Ivermectin is ineffective, despite a meta-analysis of 99 studies indicating an 85% improvement in prophylaxis with Ivermectin. He also claimed that vaccines don't cause autism, even though there are numerous indications to the contrary, and no definitive statement can be made.
He also suggests that Covid 'vaccines' don't result in infertility. However, a video from Project Veritas captures a former Pfizer employee suggesting otherwise. Furthermore, data indicates a significant drop in fertility rates in many countries, with numerous women reporting missed periods post-vaccination. Such assertions from him appear highly unscientific and intentionally misleading.
🚨EXPOSED – Over the past four years, Prof. @devisridhar, an asset of the WEF and @gatesfoundation, has been strongly discriminating against the unvaccinated and spreading lies. Now, she's attempting to absolve herself of any blame, but that is not going to happen.
A THREAD🧵⬇️
#1 Devi Sridhar is a professor & chair of Global Public Health at the University of Edinburgh and has been one of the biggest WEF-shills. She has stated that "global events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change are making us all sicker", but rejects to blame the vaxx.
#2 Instead, she is now blaming the politicians for the policies she once demanded. The fact that she can do this in a newspaper funded by the @gatesfoundation says it all. That woman is connected to the WEF, GAVI, the Clintons, and Gates - and I have proof of it.
🧵THREAD: Remember when they cancelled millions of cancer screening appointments, leading to a significant increase in avoidable cancer deaths, while they performed ridiculous dance routines instead?
Let me show you 25 more pieces of evidence proving that Covid was a big hoax.⬇️
#1 Remember when being symptomless was considered one of the symptoms? The lie that one could be asymptotically ill, along with fraudulent PCR tests, only made this plandemic possible. Either you are sick, or you aren't; being healthy was not a symptom of illness until 2020.
#2 Remember when the CCP 🇨🇳 released CCTV recordings showing people collapsing on the street like sacks of rice, catching themselves with their hands just before impact, and then shaking spasmodically? They said it was one of the Covid symptoms and nobody ever questioned it.