🧵THREAD: The future of our planet is at stake. Misleading information is all over the media. I am raising my voice based on my understanding from Michael Crichton's "State of Fear." In his book, he sheds light on the hazards of politicizing science. It's more topical than ever.
2/ Picture a brand new scientific idea that alerts us to an impending crisis and offers a solution. This theory quickly gains the support of media outlets, top scientists, politicians, and prominent figures across the globe.
3/ Research is supported by well-known philanthropists and conducted at esteemed universities and research centres. The crisis is frequently covered by the media and is included in the curricula of colleges and high schools.
4/ I am not talking about #COVID here. I’m talking about another theory, which rose to prominence a century ago. Its supporters included Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill. It was also approved by US Supreme Court justices, who ruled in its favour.
5/ And it wasn't just politicians who were on board, it had some of the biggest names in history supporting it too! Think of Alexander Bell or Leland Stanford, the founder of @Stanford. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, there were countless others who believed in this idea.
This mRNA and mask pusher is a liar and a coward. Not only did @DrNeilStone lie about the efficacy of vitamin D, but he also blocked me so I can’t reply to his deceitful post.
The fact is that vitamin D is highly effective, but many studies are flawed due to the following serious biases:
1. It takes months to raise vitamin D blood serum levels with conventional supplementation, which is why many studies fail to show an effect. However, treatments using the directly bioavailable calcifediol would yield completely different results—but for some reason, scientists refuse to use it.
2. Almost all studies define vitamin D sufficiency at 20 or 30 ng/mL, which is absurd. The minimum healthy level should be at least 50 ng/mL (see next post).
3. Many studies use insufficient doses (e.g., 400-800 IU/day), which barely move the needle on blood serum levels.
4. Some studies don’t measure participants’ initial vitamin D levels. Without knowing who was already deficient, studies may dilute real effects by including non-deficient subjects.
5. Vitamin D metabolism depends on cofactors like magnesium, vitamin K2, zinc, and boron. Despite this, most studies ignore these cofactors, leading to weaker or misleading results.
Also, during the plandemic, nearly everyone who died from the so-called deadly virus had vitamin D blood levels below 10 ng/mL. Literally nobody with adequate vitamin D levels died from it.
This MD should have his license revoked for spreading dangerous lies.
🚨OMFG—This Chinese-born woman, @DrLeanaWen, just called on Biden to immediately authorize bird flu vaccines and distribute millions of doses ASAP.
This woman hates your freedom and should be behind bars. Yet, the mainstream media continues to give her a platform.
A THREAD 🧵
1/ In September 2021, Wen demanded that the unvaccinated should not be allowed to leave their homes.
This statement lacks support from available data to this day. It appears that you can take China-born Leana Wen out of communism but you can’t take communism out of Leana Wen.
2/ In April 2021, Wen labeled people who choose not to vaccinate themselves or their children as 'anti-science'.
Covid never posed any risk to children or adolescents. Yet, she pushed for getting children vaccinated and she’s trying to do it again.
#2 Masks did work, but not in the way they were communicated. They were used as a social conditioning tool to remind everyone of an allegedly deadly pandemic. They served as a daily reminder of an invisible enemy that turned out to be much less deadly than claimed.
#3 Already during the Spanish flu, it was claimed that masks would reduce transmission by 99%. However, studies suggest that wearing them for a long time caused bacterial pneumonia back in 1918.
Over the past four years, presstitutes have come up with many reasons for the rise in heart damage (e.g. showering). However, none blamed it on the experimental gene therapy administered to billions around the globe.
Let me walk you through my TOP 22 reasons in this THREAD. 🧵
#1 The weather: Both summer and winter temperatures, according to mainstream journalists, are to blame for the increased number of heart diseases and blood clots. It seems we're just in for a heart-stopping season no matter the weather! 🤡🌎
#2 Artificial sweeteners: According to a study, artificial sweeteners are responsible for an increased risk of heart attacks. Guess that's just another "bitter" finding in the world of "sweet" science! 🤡🌎
🚨EXPOSED – For the past four years, Prof. @devisridhar, a WEF and @gatesfoundation asset, has actively discriminated against the unvaccinated while spreading misinformation. Now, she’s trying to evade accountability, but that’s not going to happen.
AN IMPORTANT THREAD🧵⬇️
1/ Devi Sridhar is a professor and chair of Global Public Health at @EdinburghUni and has been one of the biggest WEF-shills. She has stated that "global events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change are making us all sicker", but rejects to blame the mass vaccination.
2/ Instead, she is now blaming the politicians for the policies she once demanded. The fact that she can do this in a newspaper funded by the @gatesfoundation says it all. That woman is connected to the WEF, GAVI, the Clintons, and Gates - and I have proof of it.
🧵THREAD: @PeterHotez is a sincere and non-corrupt scientist who has been right about everything in the last four years.
1/ @PeterHotez has been spreading lies from the beginning. For example, in May 2021, he advocated vaccinating children to achieve herd immunity. His narrative was uncritically pushed by the MSM, and millions of children were harmed because of him. (Just look at his eyes!)
2/ The problem is that until April 2020, he was claiming the opposite. Back then, Hotez expressed concerns about a potential vaccine for the seasonal cold virus. But how did it come to pass that he suddenly changed his opinion and labeled all critics as anti-science?