🔹The author: Yang is the head of the highly regarded Beijing Cultural Review (BCR). He is also the director of the Longway Foundation which publishes BCR. The foundation describes its publication as “the most influential magazine of intellectual thought and commentary in China”.
▫️ Yang’s views in a nutshell:
1⃣ “Capitalist politics” are no longer in line with “capitalist economics”. The former now undermines globalisation, while the latter supports it.
2⃣ #Sanctions , export controls, friend-shoring and alliance-building are damaging the #worldeconomy and further alienating China from the current US-led international order.
3⃣ China must respond to this growing trend by building a “new type of international system” with other countries in the Global South.
4⃣ BRI projects should be increasingly focused on achieving this goal and thus allow more room for loss-making endeavours.
🪧 Yang's ideas are not particularly novel but are nevertheless of note in that they represent yet another viewpoint in the ongoing debate over how 🇨🇳 should respond to the increasing tensions that characterise its relations with the #UnitedStates and other Western countries.
🪧 As evidenced in previous editions of Sinification, opinions on this question can range from Da Wei (达巍) stressing the importance of preserving if not strengthening ties with the West and Shen Wei (沈伟) arguing in favour of reforming the #WTO and ->
-> building up a network of free trade agreements to Ye Hailin (叶海林) emphasising the need for #China to demonstrate its #military might to demobilise US allies and Lu Feng (路风) calling for self-reliance and greater assertiveness in the field of tech.
🪧 Remember #XiJinping encouraging #CCP members/diplomats to show a “fighting spirit" and his repeated emphasis on "being good at struggling"?
What this implies is still being debated in #China.
Below is a 'moderate' take by one of China’s most respected US specialists:
🧵🧵🧵
🔹 Da Wei (达巍) is a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University and the director of its prestigious Centre for International Security and Strategy (CISS).
▫️ “The 20th Party Congress demanded that the whole of the Party ‘carry forward its fighting/struggling spirit’ ... It is important to stress that the #communist emphasis on struggle is a #Marxist philosophical concept & must be distinguished from the struggle of everyday life.”
▫️ “When it comes to international political risks, the US's domestic problems have to be placed at the top of the list ... the US’s internal divisions produce huge externalities that have far-reaching effects on world politics.”
▫️ "So, will a transfer [of the US’s domestic tensions] occur at the military level? This is even more worrying. Countries must guard themselves against this [各国不可不防]."
"#RishiSunak has now become the representative of 🇬🇧's hardliners on #China. We cannot expect him to become a moderate on China again after becoming PM."
🔹 Author: Xu Ruike (徐瑞珂) – Prof. at Beijing Foreign Studies University.
▫️ "Under Sunak, the 'Americanisation' of Britain's China policy will remain evident ... Economics will take a back seat. Suspicion and hostility towards China will gradually become the defining theme of Sino-British relations."
▫️ "The right-wing forces of the Conservative backbenchers represented by @aliciakearns and @MPIainDS will exert significant influence on Downing Street's China policy."
“The US's incremental adjustments allow resources to continue to be channelled into 🇨🇳 through ‘third countries’, ‘detours’ or even ‘transfers’, thereby allowing 🇨🇳 to make adjustments and repairs to its supply chains.” – Ma Xue, CICIR analyst.
“The US does not have a complete monopoly on cutting-edge research ... This means that unilateral US controls are often ineffective and the paths for technology transfers to #China are difficult to block."
"Political controls placed on strategic industries will undermine 🇺🇸's future tech competitiveness. US export controls, entity lists and other similar restrictions have reduced the sales of US companies to 🇨🇳 and [thus] reduced the revenues that can then be reinvested in R&D."
This is how Scholz's visit to 🇨🇳 + COSCO deal is being interpreted in China:
"[COSCO's acquisition] underlines that German Chancellor Scholz is still relatively steady and pragmatic vis-à-vis developing relations with China." – Wu Huiping, Centre for 🇩🇪 Studies at Tongji Univ.
"Scholz is also sending a certain message to those within Germany, that is: although the Greens are currently running the country’s foreign ministry, Germany’s most important foreign policy-making power still lies in the hands of the chancellor." – Wu Huiping
“Scholz's upcoming visit to 🇨🇳 is a sign of 🇩🇪's strong desire to encourage the further development of 🇨🇳-🇩🇪 cooperation at an important point in time – right after the 20th Party Congress and just as Chinese-style modernisation is embarking on a new journey.” – Tian Dewen, CASS