Russian opposition activist Alexey #Navalny wrote a 15-point programme: meduza.io/feature/2023/0… With the exception of a few disputable arguments, the programme is quite decent and is a good foundation for further discussions with progressive pro-Western Russians. A thread ->
The most important point: Navalny unequivocally acknowledges the internationally recognised borders of #Ukraine (1991). Which clearly implies the need for restoration of Ukraine's sovereignty over #Crimea and all other currently occupied/annexed territories of Ukraine. 2/10
Navalny explicitly opposes #Russia's war against Ukraine, and - unlike many others in the so-called Russian "liberal camp" - does not seek to portray Russian people as victims of "the #Putin war" on a par with Ukrainians. 3/10
He does mention "meaningless" deaths of thousands of Russian soldiers, but that's fair: their deaths are indeed ultimately meaningless. 4/10
Interestingly, Navalny indirectly admits that Russian corruption plays an important role in Russia's journey to the military defeat. I've been arguing this for months now: 5/10
More specifically, Navalny writes: "The combination 'aggressive war + corruption + mediocrity of generals + weak economy + heroism and high morale of defenders' results only in the [Russian] defeat". More corruption in Russia please! 6/10
Insightfully, Navalny points out that all the #Kremlin talk about "negotiations" and "ceasefire" are deceitful and hypocritical. -- A good reminder for Western "pacifists"! 7/10
What needs to be done: (1) let Ukraine live and develop as its people want; (2) withdraw all Russian troops from Ukraine's territory (1991); (3) offer reparations to Ukraine; (4) investigate war crimes in cooperation with international institutions. 8/10
And this is how Navalny sees Russia's future: (1) dismantling of the Putin regime, "ideally through general free elections and convening of the constitutional assembly"; (2) parliamentary republic; (3) part of #Europe. 9/10
Again, I feel that some Navalny's arguments in the programme are disputable but his programme nevertheless sets the right tone for further discussions. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As the German edition of RT has been severely damaged by the latest round of the EU sanctions, it’s worth reviewing research our great colleagues did on that edition. 1/5
When Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov appeared in a home video in November 2022 to dispel the rumours about his alleged hospitalisation in Indonesia while attending the G20 summit, various Western observers focused on all the wrong things with their sarcastic comments. 1/8
Some pointed out that Lavrov used American technology (Apple Watch and Iphone), while being notorious for his public anti-American views. 2/8
Others noted that he wore a Basquiat t-shirt and mentioned that the American artist was a “queer” and died of an heroin overdose, thus hinting at the discrepancy between Russia’s declared “traditional values” and the presumed lifestyle behind the garment chosen by Lavrov. 3/8
Ever since the European Parliament adopted the controversial yet potentially game-changing resolution on recognising Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism (tinyurl.com/37kvj857), everybody has been - expectedly - discussing the resolution's primary thesis only. 1/7
However, the resolution featured yet another thesis, which had no direct relationship to the main point of the document but which may have a groundbreaking effect on our perception of Russia's war against Europe today. 2/7
The penultimate paragraph of the resolution emphasises that Russia's current aggression against Ukraine "highlights the need for a thorough historical and legal evaluation of and a transparent public debate about the crimes of the Soviet regime..." 3/7
Ukraine needs to do something painful yet necessary: a THREAD 👇🏻
Russia’s genocidal war against Ukraine is more than a conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It’s even more than Russia’s war on Europe. Essentially, what we have today is the continuation of the Second World War.
Rather than dismissing or ridiculing Russia’s claims of waging an anti-fascist struggle, we must take them seriously - but importantly - put them in the context of ->
I was happy to take part in the panel discussion "A War of Values: Can Europe find its place in a new world?" organised by Debates on Europe @DebatesOnEurope in Dresden, here's the video:
In particular, I argued that while Western Europe condemns #Russia's invasion of #Ukraine, it feels uneasy about Ukraine's heroic resistance because of the shift of moral authority from Western Europe to Central and Eastern Europe - three months of "We told you so". 2/4
Already now, we witness the emergence of a new geopolitical reality in which Central and Eastern Europe, and especially the Three Seas bloc, will play a role politically more significant than Western Europe. 3/4
Russian government official Dmitry Rogozin: “What has emerged in place of Ukraine is an existential threat to the Russian people, Russian history, the Russian language and Russian civilisation”. 1/9
According to the speaker of the Russian “parliament” Vyacheslav Volodin, Russia is Putin, so if you replace “Russian” with “Putin’s” in Rogozin’s quote, you’ll realise that Rogozin is actually right. 2/9
In a follow-up tweet, Rogozin expectedly calls for the genocide of Ukrainians, saying that the Russians need to accomplish what their grandfathers failed to do - he probably meant the Holodomor, Stalin’s attempt to destroy the Ukrainians through the artificial famine. 3/9