Pfizer told us their vaccine is 95% effective (🤡).
What that really means is it's effective against testing positive - they never published the actual rate of illness.
Corona-like-illnes (CLI) is the actual relevant endpoint, that should have been measured in the RCT's.

Now we have more data:
"The vaccine only reduced the incidence of COVID-like illness by a relative 9.4% from an absolute 18% to an absolute 16.3%, [..]"
--> That's a reduction 1.7%, or 9.4% in relative terms - but what a minute, what about the vaccine side effects?

Read 8 tweets

Ben

@USMortality

Feb 6

South Korea, saw +63% excess mortality in March 2022. At that point, 86% of their population was vaccinated.

ourworldindata.org/explorers/coro…

mortality.watch/?q=%7B%22c%22%…

Read 4 tweets

Ben

@USMortality

Feb 1

Diamond Princess 2020 - only 17% of passengers were PCR positive, less than 9% symptomatic.
83% were not infected and already immune, hence PFR = IFR = 7/3700 = 0.19%!

0.19% is exactly in line with a regular flu. 83% not infected is also in line with a regular flu season. There was basically no flu in 2020..
Here's a detailed age break down.

Source:
eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…
github.com/thimotei/cCFRD…

Read 5 tweets

Ben

@USMortality

Jan 22

https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1541434285999243266

Eric Feigl-Ding, and others, spreads vaccine propaganda with supposedly scientific models.
I explain why this is clear unscientific misinformation here in the thread!
🧵 1/n

https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1541434285999243266

In less than an hour and with a few lines of R code, I recreated a similar model - which is based on false assumptions:
github.com/USMortality/ch…

So how does it work?
Quite simple, it is based on the - never scientifically proven - assumption that vaccination protects ~90% from death.

This allows us to create a model that calculates the case fatality rate (CFR) with no assumed vaccine effect.

Read 7 tweets

Ben

@USMortality

Jan 22

https://twitter.com/Martin_Moder/status/1617152789825683457

Ein Molekularbiologe verbreitet mit angeblich wissenschaftlichen Modellen Impfpropaganda.
Warum es sich hier um klare unwissenschaftliche Missinformationen handelt, erkläre ich hier im Thread!
🧵 1/n

https://twitter.com/Martin_Moder/status/1617152789825683457

In weniger als einer Stunde und mit ein paar Zeilen R Code habe ich ein ähnliches Modell - welches auf Fehlannahmen beruht - nachgebaut:
github.com/USMortality/ch…

Also, wie funktioniert es?
Ganz einfach, es beruht auf der - nie wissenschaftlich belegten Annahme, dass die Impfung zu ~90% vor dem Tod schützt.

So können wir ein Modell erstellen, das die Case Fatality Rate (CFR) ohne angeblichen Impfeffekt berechnet.

Read 11 tweets

Share this page!

Ben

People who liked this thread also liked...

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @USMortality

Ben

Ben

Ben

Ben

Ben

Ben

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!