Thread by @Jikkyleaks

Extracorporeal cheese 🧀🧀🧀
#ECMOgate

Did anaesthetists (intensivists) who openly declared their hatred for "antivaxxers" on social media send them on a pathway to death?

This could be bigger than the #midazolam scandal.

THREAD.

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1631540817121935360

That was the damning table. But for background let's just wind back a bit.

@caz_sampson is a self declared ICU anaesthetist. In the UK, anaesthetists run the ICUs. In the US they tend to be called intensivists.

Notice Caz's horns on her profile picture - we'll come back to it

Caz is a associate of the #muttoncrew who follow @swaledalemutton and their affiliates whose job is to "counter disinformation".

One of their techniques is to label people they don't like "antivaxxers" without defining that term.

Caz hates antivaxxers.
archive.is/5VqVw

It's important to note that Caz is not the only ICU intensivist or anaesthetist who hates "antivaxxers". There are plenty of them around. They encourage this kind of fundamentalist hatred against this undefined group they label "antivaxxers"

So, just think about what would happen if someone, who has not taken the glorious opportunity to have Pfizer's mRNA gene therapy vaccine, would dare to turn up on Caz's intensive care unit.

Would they receive a warm welcome?

Let's have a look at Caz's profile pic again....

The overt horns symbolism is bizarre for an anaesthetist using her medical profile on social media. It seems to be saying something.

What do horns symbolise?

It's well-known. Baphomet. Symbol of satanists. nytimes.com/2018/11/22/art…

Now, I'm not suggesting that Caz Sampson is a satanist but displaying this symbolism on your profile picture as a medical professional is a really bad look.

It *looks* like you're a satanist.

Now we have to add some context and this gets very dark very quickly.

We get back to the original post in this thread. Here we have a table from the UK ICU data showing that in their study, there was a 57:43 ratio of unvaccinated:vaccinated people in the ICU in early 2022. It suggests that vaccination was protective...

But we know this not to be true from the NSW ICU data showing no unvaccinated COVID ICU patients for months.

The higher number of unvaccinated in early 2022 was just a "catch up" anomaly
arkmedic.substack.com/p/catch-me-if-…

Irrespective, let's accept there were more unvaccinated on ICU in the UK in early 2022. This data is now damning because it shows that the "fully vaccinated" (i.e. 2 dose, per the conditional licence approval) were exactly the same severity as the "unvaccinated"....

This excerpt excludes the recently boosted (who have a "healthy recently vaccinated" bias), so these groups are pretty comparable.

The FiO2 is the inspired oxygen concentration. If your lungs are failing you'll need more oxygen.

The FiO2 is the same in each group - 60%

So based on the ICNAR data (which Caz kindly supplied) the vaccinated and unvaccinated have a similar profile of severity on admission to ICU. That is, they are equally affected by COVID "pneumonia"

But what happens then?

Well Caz says that nearly 100% of the unvaccinated were put on ECMO. She quotes a solid reference that confirms her claim.

Overall, the rate of ECMO is about 15:1 in favour of the unvaccinated.

england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-…

Caz's claim is that this is because the "vaccine" (which did not reduce infection risk and in which the only RCT showed no benefit of severity or death) reduced the severity of disease.

But these groups had the same FiO2 on admission, so this is not possible.

Therefore the only possibility that makes any logical sense is:

A cascade of events happened on ICU that resulted in the unvaccinated receiving ECMO (which is a 4 in 10 death sentence) 15 times more often than the vaccinated

https://twitter.com/Jikkyleaks/status/1631518277678792707?s=20

So who decided who should go on ECMO (with a 40% death rate) and who shouldn't?

Well, Caz of course. And her "antivaxx" hating colleagues.

Imagine leaving your fate in the hands of people who post such symbolic profile pictures.

So, we have a group of doctors who hate "antivaxxers" who coincidentally decide that 15 times more "antivvaxxers" (aka the unvaccinated) should go on the highest risk pathway in modern medicine compared to the "vaccinated"

Even though their admission state was the same.

It's hard to fight bias. Everybody has biases.

But if you are an unvaccinated person who ends up on ICU because nobody was prepared to give you the #3tablets you needed to prevent it...

You have a 15:1 chance you will be put on the death pathway by people that hate you.

I'm sure that Caz has a perfectly manicured explanation for this vindictive 15:1 ratio.

Expect @projecthalo and their buddies to troll this thread with them.

Expect Caz to vehemently deny the symbolism of her profile picture.

But if you have an "unvaccinated" relative that died in an NHS ICU of "COVID" in 2021-2022, remember that you have the right to request the full medical records.

Once you have them, contact @pjhlaw who knows who to ask to review them.

Refs:
Twitter profile:
archive.is/YCNQF
Antivaxxer tweets
archive.is/5VqVw
Following list
archive.is/7RcLT
ICNARC dataset
icnarc.org/DataServices/A…

Well it looks like the bravado has gone..

@projecthalo affiliates hate having the light shone on them but love to crow about us.

I think this is a bad look given the serious nature of #ECMOgate.

Do we need a CQC investigation into UK ICUs?

@CQCpressoffice

IMPORTANT PSA:
Please do not post vitriol on the twitter pages of people involved with this investigation.

An investigation has not been undertaken yet. This is an area of concern only.

Please be civil in any interactions.

Thank you.

UPDATE: @caz_sampson replies to the thread from behind a block.

A tip. If you are digging yourself into a hole, stop digging.

This is like Harry putting his famous Nazi uniform fancy dress picture as his profile pic and saying "it was just fancy dress wassup lol"