Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Mar 3 β€’ 24 tweets β€’ 10 min read
Extracorporeal cheese πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€

Did anaesthetists (intensivists) who openly declared their hatred for "antivaxxers" on social media send them on a pathway to death?

This could be bigger than the #midazolam scandal.

That was the damning table. But for background let's just wind back a bit.

@caz_sampson is a self declared ICU anaesthetist. In the UK, anaesthetists run the ICUs. In the US they tend to be called intensivists.

Notice Caz's horns on her profile picture - we'll come back to it
Caz is a associate of the #muttoncrew who follow @swaledalemutton and their affiliates whose job is to "counter disinformation".

One of their techniques is to label people they don't like "antivaxxers" without defining that term.

Caz hates antivaxxers.
It's important to note that Caz is not the only ICU intensivist or anaesthetist who hates "antivaxxers". There are plenty of them around. They encourage this kind of fundamentalist hatred against this undefined group they label "antivaxxers"
So, just think about what would happen if someone, who has not taken the glorious opportunity to have Pfizer's mRNA gene therapy vaccine, would dare to turn up on Caz's intensive care unit.

Would they receive a warm welcome?

Let's have a look at Caz's profile pic again....
The overt horns symbolism is bizarre for an anaesthetist using her medical profile on social media. It seems to be saying something.

What do horns symbolise?

It's well-known. Baphomet. Symbol of satanists. nytimes.com/2018/11/22/art…
Now, I'm not suggesting that Caz Sampson is a satanist but displaying this symbolism on your profile picture as a medical professional is a really bad look.

It *looks* like you're a satanist.

Now we have to add some context and this gets very dark very quickly.
We get back to the original post in this thread. Here we have a table from the UK ICU data showing that in their study, there was a 57:43 ratio of unvaccinated:vaccinated people in the ICU in early 2022. It suggests that vaccination was protective...
But we know this not to be true from the NSW ICU data showing no unvaccinated COVID ICU patients for months.

The higher number of unvaccinated in early 2022 was just a "catch up" anomaly
Irrespective, let's accept there were more unvaccinated on ICU in the UK in early 2022. This data is now damning because it shows that the "fully vaccinated" (i.e. 2 dose, per the conditional licence approval) were exactly the same severity as the "unvaccinated"....
This excerpt excludes the recently boosted (who have a "healthy recently vaccinated" bias), so these groups are pretty comparable.

The FiO2 is the inspired oxygen concentration. If your lungs are failing you'll need more oxygen.

The FiO2 is the same in each group - 60%
So based on the ICNAR data (which Caz kindly supplied) the vaccinated and unvaccinated have a similar profile of severity on admission to ICU. That is, they are equally affected by COVID "pneumonia"

But what happens then?
Well Caz says that nearly 100% of the unvaccinated were put on ECMO. She quotes a solid reference that confirms her claim.

Overall, the rate of ECMO is about 15:1 in favour of the unvaccinated.

Caz's claim is that this is because the "vaccine" (which did not reduce infection risk and in which the only RCT showed no benefit of severity or death) reduced the severity of disease.

But these groups had the same FiO2 on admission, so this is not possible.
Therefore the only possibility that makes any logical sense is:

A cascade of events happened on ICU that resulted in the unvaccinated receiving ECMO (which is a 4 in 10 death sentence) 15 times more often than the vaccinated

So who decided who should go on ECMO (with a 40% death rate) and who shouldn't?

Well, Caz of course. And her "antivaxx" hating colleagues.

Imagine leaving your fate in the hands of people who post such symbolic profile pictures.
So, we have a group of doctors who hate "antivaxxers" who coincidentally decide that 15 times more "antivvaxxers" (aka the unvaccinated) should go on the highest risk pathway in modern medicine compared to the "vaccinated"

Even though their admission state was the same.
It's hard to fight bias. Everybody has biases.

But if you are an unvaccinated person who ends up on ICU because nobody was prepared to give you the #3tablets you needed to prevent it...

You have a 15:1 chance you will be put on the death pathway by people that hate you.
I'm sure that Caz has a perfectly manicured explanation for this vindictive 15:1 ratio.

Expect @projecthalo and their buddies to troll this thread with them.

Expect Caz to vehemently deny the symbolism of her profile picture.
But if you have an "unvaccinated" relative that died in an NHS ICU of "COVID" in 2021-2022, remember that you have the right to request the full medical records.

Once you have them, contact @pjhlaw who knows who to ask to review them.
Twitter profile:
Antivaxxer tweets
Following list
ICNARC dataset
Well it looks like the bravado has gone..

@projecthalo affiliates hate having the light shone on them but love to crow about us.

I think this is a bad look given the serious nature of #ECMOgate.

Do we need a CQC investigation into UK ICUs?

Please do not post vitriol on the twitter pages of people involved with this investigation.

An investigation has not been undertaken yet. This is an area of concern only.

Please be civil in any interactions.

Thank you.
UPDATE: @caz_sampson replies to the thread from behind a block.

A tip. If you are digging yourself into a hole, stop digging.

This is like Harry putting his famous Nazi uniform fancy dress picture as his profile pic and saying "it was just fancy dress wassup lol"

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Mar 5
The #gerigate and #ECMOgate scandals just keep on coming.

In 2020 there were 32,000 less cancers diagnosed in the UK than there should have been.

Instead of being investigated for suspected cancer, they were given #midazolam

Remember to clap. Every Thursday. Overall numbers of cancer d...
Note there were 72,000 "COVID" deaths in 2020 - about 0.1% of the population.

The drop in cancers was about 10%

Therefore the COVID deaths could not account for the drop in cancers, assuming they were independent.
Data source is embedded in the graphic but in case you missed it
Read 5 tweets
Mar 3

Following the #ECMOgate scandal revealed earlier today, should the @CQCProf start an investigation into NHS intensive care units and social media accounts of intensivists to see if their bias against "antivaxxers" was linked to higher death rates?
Please archive any tweets from UK intensivists containing the "antivaxxer" slur ASAP

antivaxxer from:twitter_name

Paste the tweet link into archive.is then paste the link here or on telegram on the t.me/micevmutton channel
Read 4 tweets
Mar 1
New cheese πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€

For those enquiring about whether hospital episode statistics confirm an increase in miscarriages... the data is early.
NHS data only goes up to March 2022.

It's massively confounded but read on.

Here is "bleeding in early pregnancy" (O20)
7-sigma increase
NHS episode statistics 2017-2022:
"Ectopic pregnancy" ICD code O00.
7 sigma increase.
NHS episode statistic 2017-2022:
"Maternal care for fetal problems"
ICD code O36.
4.7 sigma increase

There are others, e.g. diabetes (7.1 sigma increase)
Read 14 tweets
Mar 1
What I've discovered over the last 3 years of this long con is that when I reveal something that is confronting but true, the #muttoncrew trolls are rolled out in force.

This is the second intensivist that is upset that they don't understand baseline miscarriage rates
So, here's a question for you #MidazolamJohnny

When Zauche presented this chart on behalf of the CDC was she misrepresenting the data, as you seem to think?

[Src: page 32: cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…]
The pregnancy data is not only made more complicated than it needs to be, but has been thoroughly misrepresented.

More on this here with references to the recent work by @sonia_elijah @MaryanneDemasi and @jathorpmfm

Read 4 tweets
Feb 26

Yesterday I put out a very important tweet thread with exclusive information on #pregnancy.

This was the thread.
I need your feedback!
This will take just a few seconds of your time.
The polls are only open for 1 day.
This is a #mousesurvey in 4 parts. Please answer all 4 questions if applicable.

Did you see this thread (i.e. the first "Cheesy debunk" tweet with the cheese emojisπŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€) on your timeline or in your mentions?
If you saw the thread do you remember retweeting the first (cheesy) tweet?
Read 6 tweets
Feb 26
Cheesy Debunk πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€...

HUGE red flags over this #pregnancy and #miscarriage paper, which is absolute junk.

We're going to dive in and show you why this should never have been published and anybody associated with it will be forever tainted.
Here's the first red flag.

Redacted tables. I have never seen this in more than 20 years reviewing papers.

This is from the actual pdf on the Hum Reprod page for the paper.
Now we're going to have to assume (because the titles are redactedπŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ) that the first forest plot shows the #miscarriage rate in each study. The bigger the square the more the weighting in the study - generally more for bigger studies.

The two largest raise a massive red flag
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!