YES individuals are the problem
YES hatred is the problem
YES poverty & racism are the problem
But YES guns in the hands of people who want to hurt themselves or others is, most of all, the problem.
One very important way: recognizing risk & acting on it.
This can be done BEFORE or AFTER someone has a gun. It can be done by family members, friends, healthcare providers, or (last ditch option) law enforcement. acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.73…
Another very important way: reducing the risk before it gets to an emergency stage.
This is about structural change. Teaching conflict resolution. Reducing substance use. And more. theatlantic.com/health/archive…
A third very important way: making sure that people with a history of harming others, can't get guns. This is about policy and enforcement.
By reducing gun trafficking.
By reducing gun thefts.
By preventing access for those with, say, a history of #domesticviolence.
Etc.
At the end of the day, the most important thing is to make sure that someone who wants to shoot someone cannot do so. 🤷♀️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This morning, on the wake of the #michiganstateshooting, I had to tell my daughter that there was a social media threat against our school system yesterday. (The threat was deemed not credible, but there will still be an increased police presence today at school.)
Research can help us fix our nation’s firearm injury epidemic - and maybe not in the ways you think. My new piece for @washingtonpost outlines 5 key questions we need answered:
1. What are the actual numbers (of injuries, defensive gun use, stolen guns, averted shootings, etc)?
Believe it or not, we don’t know. (This is why CDC websites mostly discuss death rates - that’s what we actually have semi-reliable data on.)
2. Who is at risk?
We can’t reliably identify what makes someone higher risk for gun suicide, homicide, mass shootings…. (Kudos to folks who are trying… but we need better data and prediction tools, both in the moment and over time.)
For the flu vaccine, we (in US) choose based on what’s circulating in the southern hemisphere. But we have no data to support that approach for Covid. FDA is proposing a June decision on dominant variant… ok.
2. Why bivalent, vs updated monovalent?
This is the big debate in the scientific community & lots of folks have strong theories. The OG (Wuhan) strain is clearly passé. Will monovalent (single variant) be more effective? Stay tuned.
But I will bet 1000:1 that (as with almost every one of these) there were missed signs. Someone that should not have been allowed to own a gun. Hatred & desperation.