PSA: I am planning to reduce the activity on this account.
I'll explain why.
THREAD
Two days ago I released a bombshell tweet exposing the shenanigans that the pharma companies and academia play in order to suppress toxicity data related to novel therapies.
The #placentagate tweet was then completely suppressed by twitter in a new shadowbanning technique that rendered the tweet invisible even to people who tried to click on it.
There was something special about this, so we dubbed it #placentagategate
The extent of suppression was intense and after about 24 hours (peak time for a tweet) the tweet "deletion" - affecting most countries - was removed and the tweet then flew, but only after a prompt.
[Thank you for those mice who responded to the call]
The tweet eventually got 500K views and 1800 retweets, which is 0.4%
As with every tweet (thread) of this sort the pro-pharma lobby sends in their minions (including the #muttoncrew trolls) who are easy enough to spot.
But this time, we had people who are not supposed to be affiliated with pharma, supposedly "our side" people trying to undermine the thread. This is in addition to the onslaught from twitter and the pharma trolls.
I actually respect being challenged and corrected, it makes us think. But I can spot detractors and this was a distraction (because it had no substance).
Criticism on the basis of strawman arguments is typical pharma troll behaviour.
I did this because I was conscious of the huge amount of work that people like myself, @CharlesRixey, @Fynnderella1, @_HeartofGrace_ and many others (I can't possibly name them all) put in to bring out data and information that exposes the hypocrisy and lies about #COVID
None of us ask for payment for this but it takes a huge amount of time. 20-40 hours a week. We also put ourselves at considerable risk. We have been doing this for 3 years.
The #pregnancy and #miscarriage tweet thread referred to above had 247,000 views and only 603 retweets.
It took 4 hours of direct work (bringing together references, making images etc) on the day and months of preparatory work to put together.
Yet only 10% of people read to the second tweet.
This dwindled to about 3% for the end of the thread.
The thread would have taken about 5 minutes to read.
90% of people couldn't be bothered.
But it gets worse.
The poll was intended to see why readers didn't retweet, and overwhelmingly this was because they chose not to or rarely retweet.
Most people answering were followers
So the truth of the matter is that, however much work we (scientists, doctors, data analysts) put in, and however much those following complain about the terrible things that the biomedical fascista have imposed on us....
Very few people care enough to do anything.
What I mean is, that despite all this work (hours, days, months) that we put in, over 99% of people don't care enough to retweet (10 seconds) or read more (1 - 5 minutes).
No wonder they managed to achieve what they did.
Apathy.
We have been fighting a 3-year battle against a machine that has unlimited funds and unlimited resources.
There are probably less than 50 people who are providing you scientific data to push back with.
Worldwide.
It is like running a marathon and finding that the crowd decided to go home because it was raining.
The few remaining decide to throw eggs.
And then, when nobody runs marathons any more the people that went home say "where did all the marathons go?"
And just to add insult to injury, at 20 miles your team mate trips you up on purpose. Then John, your other team mate, says "don't sweat it Jikster, we're all on the same side - dontyaknow?"
And while you're at home, watching the TV, you can ask yourself "where did that marathon running mouse go?"
So I think I'll have a rest.
And maybe I'll stay rested, and see how many people miss the marathon runners enough to get a little bit wet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In that study the fetal loss rate DOUBLED (4.2% to 9.8%) but had little impact on the overall number of fetuses.
This is how this information is hidden. That single slide should have been enough to prompt much more investigation, because it showed fewer fetuses in EVERY GROUP
This thread shows that Viki Male, Ofer Beharier, Leena Mithal and Mary Prahl published results that they KNEW did not show that the COVID vaccine wasn't reachiing the fetus.
Their data was then used to lie to the public. #Placentagate
Paper 1. Prahl.
Medrxiv.
Falsely presenting a story that mRNA products weren't transferring across the placenta, using inappropriate IgM serology in the fetus. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Paper 2. Mithal.
Falsely presenting a story that mRNA products weren't transferring across the placenta, using inappropriate IgM serology in the fetus. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
.@VikiLovesFACS is relying on the lack of fetal production of IgM to claim that the magical LNP (that we now know gets to the placenta), doesn't get into the fetal circulation.
But the fetus doesn't produce IgM in any meaningful quantity...
Viki doesn't actually quote studies showing the vaccine does not cross the placenta but a new study has just come out showing Lipid nanoparticles crossing into the placenta and delivering active mRNA.
This is what luciferase expression in mouse PLACENTAS from LNP-mRNA look like
And this is the paper. I have a feeling there will be pressure put on the authors to retract, by the Pharma companies and their lobbyists.