Rabbi Mike Profile picture
Mar 23 12 tweets 4 min read
Official Statement by the Indiana Board of Rabbis Opposing SB480 and HB1608 #thread

The Indiana General Assembly is presently considering Senate Bill 480, which would make it illegal for physicians or other practitioner from: (1) knowingly providing gender transition…/1 Image
…procedures to an individual who is younger than 18 years of age (minor); and (2) aiding or abetting another physician or practitioner in the provision of gender transition procedures to a minor. We, the undersigned members of The Indiana Board of Rabbis (IBOR) affirm…/2
our sacred Jewish tradition that sees parents as God's partners the creation of each human being. At the same time, we uphold our longstanding tradition that the practice of medicine is a mitzvah, a holy commandment. We would categorically oppose imposing civil or criminal…/3
…penalties for properly providing health care according to the standards of the medical, nursing and allied health care professions.

Torah teaches that human beings are created in the Divine Image (Gen 1:27-28). The meaning and condition of each person’s creation…/4
…including their gender identity, is revealed over time through their lived experience and cannot be limited to a set of objective criteria that is evaluated solely by others. The identity of transgender people is authentic and God-given. To deny their gender identity…/5
…is therefore discriminatory and immoral.

The Jewish principle of pikuach nefesh, the obligation to save human life, requires us to oppose this legislation. Denying one’s identity is a threat to their health and wellbeing. The American Academy of Pediatrics…/6
…has published research finding alarming levels of attempted suicide among transgender youth. This bill presents a clear danger to transgender youth.

House Bill 1608 legislates what teachers can teach about sexuality and forbids them from answering questions from…/7
…students, as well as disallows school staff from using names or pronouns different from the student’s assigned sex at birth without notifying a parent first. As with SB480, we affirm the sanctity of the parent-child relationship. While we uphold the rights of parents…/8
… to individually determine their child’s participation in Health & Wellness education offered in schools, we do not believe that one parent has the right to determine how another child is to be educated. And to deny an answer to a child’s question is anathema…/9
…to Jewish teaching. Our sages said, “Make for yourself a teacher; acquire for yourself a friend; and judge every person on the positive side.” Teaching is a sacred act, and learning is the key to human wholeness.

SB480 imposes the will of the state on parents…/10
creates indignity against transgender youth, and sets up conditions that threaten their very lives. HB 1608 restricts the rights of parents to decide what’s best for their children and criminalizes teachers. /11
For these reasons, the undersigned members of the Indiana Board of Rabbis oppose this bill and urge every elected member of the Indiana General Assembly to vote against this proposed legislation.
#indiana #sb480 #hb1608 #translivesmatter @INDprogressives @ACLUIndiana Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rabbi Mike

Rabbi Mike Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RabbiHarvey

Mar 17
There was a request for me to do a #thread on the multiple facets of God in the Bible, dismissing the much later inventions that God is Omnipotent, Omniscient, and Omnipresent. These are very new ideas (respectively), so let's get started. #threadstorytime #threadseries
Because Genesis 2/3 is based on Enuma Elish, and contains the ideas of Near Eastern gods (see other threads about this), it makes sense that the god of Genesis 2/3 is not any of the three O's. Genesis 3 shows this well: /1
For one, God is "moving" or walking about in the garden which makes God not omnipresent. More importantly, God asking Adam "Where are You?" This is not a play on words. The God of this chapter literally does not know where Adam is. This God also does not know what occurred/2
Read 17 tweets
Mar 14
Well, a lot of you have been asking about a David/Jonathan thread, about not how they were just lovers but married! @maklelan and @sohelpmejesseca were just talking about it too! Here it goes! #threadseries #thread
So let's get the obvious stuff out of the way. David was bisexual, and he and Jonathan were lovers. The evidence in the text of this is strong. And while some may deny it, those are the same men who scream that Song of Songs is about Israel and God. So let's go through this./1
We read in 1st Samuel 18 that Jonathan's "nefesh" his soul, became "nik'sh'ra" (bound up or binded) with the "nefesh" of David. Soul on soul love. Deep love. This is not friendship. This is soulmates. Moreover, from a Hebrew point of view, the word "nik'sh'ra" is.../2
Read 23 tweets
Mar 11
Well friends, we've been seeing a lot of Christian nonsense about the David/Bat Sheva story and a few of you wonderful followers, especially @_nomadic_soul have been asking for a #thread on the matter, so how can I say no? Sit back, and enjoy this one. #threadsofthreads
As a Jew, and biblical scholar, it is difficult to see how anyone could read this story as a David apologist, but apparently it's out there and I think it's important to understand the biblical author's intentions, and the commentator's reactions, and who they were. /1
These are men who are the authors, men who are the commentators, and men who are the church fathers later looking to make David their hero and unblemished. But let's set the stage: /2
Read 23 tweets
Mar 3
Quick lesson friends on debunking that Matthew was the "Most Jewish Gospel." While this is a popular Christian talking point, it is simply untrue. Christians believe this because of Matthew's use of Jewish genealogy, his repeated quoting of Jewish scripture.../1
...and that Matthew’s Jesus firmly upholds and extends Jewish Law:
"Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfill them."
HOWEVER, Luke also employs genealogy, Luke-Acts cites Jewish scripture even more extensively/2
...than does Matthew, Yet Luke is not widely deemed Jewish on either account. Matthew is composed in Greek drawing on 92% of the verses in the Greek Mark, Matthew’s Primary Source, reproducing 51% of Mark’s very words.
Matthew models Jesus on a legalistic Moses.../3
Read 8 tweets
Mar 3
Happy Friday and Happy #thread Day!
You wanted to know about the meaning(s) behind Genesis 1? Well here it is! But buckle up because it's not what you think!
#ThreadsOfLight #threadstory #threads #THREADOFTHREADS
The very first question we should be asking ourselves about Genesis 1 is not "is this true?" That's a Sunday School question, and we're at the adults table. The question is, "Who wrote it?" Genesis 1 is what scholars denote as a "P" Source, meaning the author(s).../1
...were or considered themselves, descendants of Aaron or representing the priestly descendants’ interest. They were most likely from the kingdom of Judah, the Southern Kingdom, and were very familiar with priestly practices and had access to these documents.../2
Read 31 tweets
Feb 28
Okay folks, as requested, here is my #thread about ANGELS in Judaism and might even tap into the differences between Judaism's angels and those within Christianity (if I have time).
#threads #threadseries #judaism #Christianity
So, before we even begin with angelic presence in the Torah and Tanakh, I think it's important to to note where angels are NOT present. Let's start with Genesis 1. While it is a popular idea that the "us" here refers to God and the angels, that is a much later idea imposed.../1
...upon the text. Instead, this refers to the pantheon, polytheistic beginnings. This is true for "b'nai elohim" (sons of god, people of god, etc), this does NOT refer to angelic beings. The transposing of angels on these polytheistic aspects of the Torah are the work.../2
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(