Bar & Bench Profile picture
Mar 29 14 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The NCLAT will shortly pronounce its judgement on Google's plea challenging the CCI order imposing a penalty of Rs 1337 crores on the tech giant for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem.
#Google #NCLAT #CCI #Android @CCI_India
The judgment will be pronounced by a bench of NCLAT Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical) at 2 PM.
Bench has assembled.

#Google #NCLAT #CCI #Android
Order: We have framed 14 issues.
NCLAT holds that the CCI investigation was not in violation of principles of natural justice.
#Breaking NCLAT upholds the CCI penalty of Rs 1337 crore imposed on Google. However, the court sets aside certain directions issued by the commission.
The court has quashed the directions issued in Paragraphs 617.3, 617.9, 617.10, and 617.7.
Direction 617.3 -- Google shall not deny acces to its play services Application Programming Interface (APIs) to disdvantage Original Equipment Manufacturers, app developers and its existing or potential competitors.
Direction 617.7 -- Google shall not restrict uninstalling of its pre-installed apps by the users.
Direction 617.9 -- Google shall allow the developers of app stores to distribute their app stores through Google Play Store.
Direction 617.10 -- Google shall not restrict the ability of app developers in any manner to distribute their apps through side-loading.
All the above mentioned directions have been held to be unsustainable.
In a detailed order, the tribunal also said that the CCI's order is not replete with comfirmation bias. It held that the pre-installation of entire Google Mobile Services (GMS) does amount to unfair use.
The bench held that by making Anti Fragmentation AGreement and ACC mandatory has limited scientific development.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Mar 29
#SupremeCourt hears a plea on uniform grounds of divorce, inheritance, guardianship, maintenance

SG Tushar Mehta: Uniform Civil Code is desirable. But this is a legislative aspect. Cannot be decided on a writ petition.
CJI DY Chandrachud: In substance petitioner seeks gender neutral and religion neutral laws in divorce, guardianship, inheritance, maintenance.. we have heard Mr Ashwini Upadhyay in person, Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for an intervenor, and SG Mehta for the Union of India.
CJI: SG Mehta submits that as a matter of policy Centre does support UCC but such an intervention in these batch of cases can be only through the parliament. We are not inclined to entertain this under Article 32
Read 7 tweets
Mar 29
Contempt plea in #HateSpeech case

#SupremeCourt hears a contempt plea regarding hate speech made against Muslims in rallies across Maharashtra

Adv Vishnu Jain: I have an IA where I have stated how calls for beheading has been made. This is filled with hatred
A counsel: I appear for Hindu samaj

Justice Joseph: Oh very good. You are the one doing this in Maharashtra

Counsel: we are across India. #SupremeCourt
Counsel: This is about larger interests of Hindus.

Justice Joseph: so you are before us now and you are holding the rallies. Do you have right to break the law ? Can you break law of land?

Counsel: No Milord. But we were not heard or impleaded. Order I Rule VIII has to be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 19 tweets
Mar 29
#SupremeCourt hears a case where increasing number of FIRs being registered against Christians with increasing number of arrests without bail

Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: nodal officers are notified per district and they are not registering a single cases. hate speeches are there in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: it is easy to make sweeping statements..

Gonsalves: please see tehseen poonawalla judgment. nodal officer was to do their job

CJI DY Chandrachud: let MHA file a reply and collation of response by the MHA. We can keep this after two weeks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Chattisgarh counsel: no notice has been issued on the petition. I can file an additional affidavit and what action have we taken on such instances.

CJI: we can have this case on April 14 and let us have a response from MHA and if in the interim something then we will see… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 29
#SupremeCourt hears a challenge to the Andhra Pradesh HC order rejecting plea by Ramoji Rao-led Eenadu publication seeking an ex parte ad interim direction to suspend the govt order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by the village and ward volunteers @eenadulivenews
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Sakshi is 176 a month, Eenadu is 207 and the govt is ousting above 200

CJI DY Chandrachud: cannot the person decide which newspaper to purchase..

Rohatgi: these are all govt volunteers and supporters. All those who support the govt will get 200 in which… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Rohatgi: govt has also said that eenadu is yellow journalism and do not go for @Eenadu_Newspapr

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 7 tweets
Mar 29
Supreme Court to hear plea by Lakshadweep administration challenging Kerala HC order suspending conviction of NCP leader PP Mohd Faizal in attempt to murder case.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
The Court is also scheduled to hear Faizal's plea seeking restoration of his Lok Sabha Membership.

Moments ago the Secretary General has restored his status as MP.

Sr Adv AM Singhvi: let me lessen your burden, after I filed a second writ today a notification has been issued that the disqualification has been withdrawn. It has taken them two months. nonetheless it can be disposed off now. then we will go to the SLP
Read 19 tweets
Mar 28
[2019 Jamia Violence case]

#DelhiHighCourt says that though in a democracy, the dissent or fundamental right of freedom of expression cannot be suppressed but, there is no place of violent action to register one’s resistance to a Government policy either.

#JamiaViolence
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made the observation while overturning the trial court's judgement discharging Sharjeel Imam, Safoora Zargar and nine others from the case.
The court says that the protest organised by the Jamia students of which Imam, Zargar and others were part of was not peaceful resistance but a violent protest which ultimately turned into riots.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(