The NCLAT will shortly pronounce its judgement on Google's plea challenging the CCI order imposing a penalty of Rs 1337 crores on the tech giant for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem. #Google#NCLAT#CCI#Android@CCI_India
The judgment will be pronounced by a bench of NCLAT Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical) at 2 PM.
NCLAT holds that the CCI investigation was not in violation of principles of natural justice.
#Breaking NCLAT upholds the CCI penalty of Rs 1337 crore imposed on Google. However, the court sets aside certain directions issued by the commission.
The court has quashed the directions issued in Paragraphs 617.3, 617.9, 617.10, and 617.7.
Direction 617.3 -- Google shall not deny acces to its play services Application Programming Interface (APIs) to disdvantage Original Equipment Manufacturers, app developers and its existing or potential competitors.
Direction 617.7 -- Google shall not restrict uninstalling of its pre-installed apps by the users.
Direction 617.9 -- Google shall allow the developers of app stores to distribute their app stores through Google Play Store.
Direction 617.10 -- Google shall not restrict the ability of app developers in any manner to distribute their apps through side-loading.
All the above mentioned directions have been held to be unsustainable.
In a detailed order, the tribunal also said that the CCI's order is not replete with comfirmation bias. It held that the pre-installation of entire Google Mobile Services (GMS) does amount to unfair use.
The bench held that by making Anti Fragmentation AGreement and ACC mandatory has limited scientific development.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt hears a plea on uniform grounds of divorce, inheritance, guardianship, maintenance
SG Tushar Mehta: Uniform Civil Code is desirable. But this is a legislative aspect. Cannot be decided on a writ petition.
CJI DY Chandrachud: In substance petitioner seeks gender neutral and religion neutral laws in divorce, guardianship, inheritance, maintenance.. we have heard Mr Ashwini Upadhyay in person, Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for an intervenor, and SG Mehta for the Union of India.
CJI: SG Mehta submits that as a matter of policy Centre does support UCC but such an intervention in these batch of cases can be only through the parliament. We are not inclined to entertain this under Article 32
#SupremeCourt hears a case where increasing number of FIRs being registered against Christians with increasing number of arrests without bail
Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: nodal officers are notified per district and they are not registering a single cases. hate speeches are there in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: it is easy to make sweeping statements..
Gonsalves: please see tehseen poonawalla judgment. nodal officer was to do their job
CJI DY Chandrachud: let MHA file a reply and collation of response by the MHA. We can keep this after two weeks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Chattisgarh counsel: no notice has been issued on the petition. I can file an additional affidavit and what action have we taken on such instances.
CJI: we can have this case on April 14 and let us have a response from MHA and if in the interim something then we will see… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#SupremeCourt hears a challenge to the Andhra Pradesh HC order rejecting plea by Ramoji Rao-led Eenadu publication seeking an ex parte ad interim direction to suspend the govt order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by the village and ward volunteers @eenadulivenews
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Sakshi is 176 a month, Eenadu is 207 and the govt is ousting above 200
CJI DY Chandrachud: cannot the person decide which newspaper to purchase..
Rohatgi: these are all govt volunteers and supporters. All those who support the govt will get 200 in which… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Rohatgi: govt has also said that eenadu is yellow journalism and do not go for @Eenadu_Newspapr
Supreme Court to hear plea by Lakshadweep administration challenging Kerala HC order suspending conviction of NCP leader PP Mohd Faizal in attempt to murder case.
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: let me lessen your burden, after I filed a second writ today a notification has been issued that the disqualification has been withdrawn. It has taken them two months. nonetheless it can be disposed off now. then we will go to the SLP
#DelhiHighCourt says that though in a democracy, the dissent or fundamental right of freedom of expression cannot be suppressed but, there is no place of violent action to register one’s resistance to a Government policy either.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made the observation while overturning the trial court's judgement discharging Sharjeel Imam, Safoora Zargar and nine others from the case.
The court says that the protest organised by the Jamia students of which Imam, Zargar and others were part of was not peaceful resistance but a violent protest which ultimately turned into riots.