I don't even know if this is a good movie. now that we've learned more about Thompson's writing and Oscar Acosta's, we're inclined to think that both #JohnnyDepp and @TerryGilliam missed the point of "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas".
at the heart of the story is an absurdity: a noisy, pointless race that only exists because someone's rich enough to make it happen. it's big and loud, so it's newsworthy—rather like other explosions in Nevada, e.g. nuclear explosions or the PEPCON ammonium nitrate explosion.
and it really *says* something about the United States and its culture, doesn't it, that the U.S. tends to treat Nevada as mere wasteland—a dead zone where one can dump shameful and dangerous things. this is a Christian thing of course; extremist Christians need to *see* Hell.
people like @MattWalshBlog and @DouthatNYT and @pastorlocke aren't ever happy with an *abstract* Hell (or Heaven) even though they're people who claim to be better at appreciating abstract things than anyone. they need material representation, to believe in Hell. hence, Nevada!
that is to say, American culture treats Nevada (and other places) as a kind of approximation of Hell, and it's tough to get Americans to care about the sufferings and problems of people in Nevada—because, you know, it's Nevada! it's Vegas horrors and nuclear wastelands and so on.
the paradoxical benefit of (unofficially) setting aside an entire state as a wasteland is that you can do anything you want there! tear the place up, nobody cares, etc.
it's a destructive, nihilistic way of treating a place, but it's also the American personality.
Americans like to destroy things! they try to be proud of it, even though it's never good to be proud of destruction.
@elonmusk is hoping to be proud of *wrecking* @Twitter, once he can't any long sustain the illusion that he's good at running it.
~Mona Drafter of Pnictogen
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
incidentally, *another* bad sign that some offered reading material is in fact propaganda is that the author (or pusher) of the work refuses to explain anything about it. @mtaibbi is particularly adept at evading difficult questions about the nature of his work.
(may I tag you in, @Jacob__Siegel? you may learn something...or you may not.)
there's a number of reasons why @mtaibbi is reluctant to explain his propaganda. emotional appeal is one reason: he's trying to tempt readers in, hinting at *mystery* and forbidden secrets.
(cont'd)
this is central to the appeal of bigotry and bigoted conspiracy theories, like the Sinophobic rubbish about #COVID19 that @NateSilver538 (and @mtaibbi and his @GOP allies) have been peddling, or the antisemitic crap that's popular with the @elonmusk / @MrAndyNgo crowd.
when is it *acceptable* not to read something that's pushed in front of you? most of us (myself included) are mortal beings, bound by time and entropy like everyone; we've got a thousand daily concerns to balance, and we can't read everything that's recommended to us.
(cont'd)
now, if you're a propagandist like @mtaibbi or @charlesmurray, it's never acceptable not to read their junk—and that attitude, right there, is a key hint that their work *is* in fact junk. it's not _proof_ but it's a strong indication that they're pushing propaganda.
(cont'd)
for the point of propaganda is not to be persuasive in terms of logic and rational inference and sensible deductions from evidence. propaganda's appeal is *emotional* appeal; @mtaibbi's work, and other right-wing propaganda, is designed to be _maximally memetic_.
this article indicates why racist dolts like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi (not to mention all those Christofascist pundits like @DouthatNYT) are so cynical about higher education: in *their* social stratum, the point of college isn't to learn anything.
a high-status college means *networking*, making powerful friends, getting job offers for no better reason than "you've been to the same upper-crust finishing school as me". @NateSilver538 is a dunce because he's never *needed* to be good at schooling—not with his connections.
all those rich parents know the score; they're willing to pay millions just to get a string of big names onto their kids' resumes. @NateSilver538's equally racist (and equally stupid) pal, @mattyglesias, son of a Hollywood writer, got sent to a $50k/year *grade school*.
I'm awaiting an event in the near future; I'm not quite sure how it's going to play out, or how quickly. but I suspect that the fiasco of @elonmusk's ownership and right-wing politicization of @Twitter will mark the end of a global illusion, perpetuated on the Internet.
(cont'd)
the illusion was that the #Internet was somehow equivalent to #democracy itself. merely being on the Internet, in this social illusion, was like participating in democracy. the idea was that "everyone" had a voice of equal weight and importance to every other voice.
(cont'd)
nobody bought into that illusion, or put more energy into sustaining it, harder than @jack Dorsey and @Twitter.
it's a lie. access to the #Internet is a matter of money, just like everything else in this authoritarian, capitalist society. the rich get *more Internet*.
one of the sillier manifestations of right-wing ideology in this era of electronic mass communication—which seems to have dissolved all political discourse into a soup of memes and buzzwords—is the oxymoronic "anarchocapitalism", or #AnCap. it's big with computer geeks.
(cont'd)
surely a large fraction of the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @ShellenbergerMD right-wing Twitter clique—which attracts mostly people who enjoy the luxury of "passive income" through non-productive means, like management or cryptocurrency—fancy themselves "anarchocapitalist".
(cont'd)
why not? the average @elonmusk / @mtaibbi fan has a purely emotional and aesthetic appreciation of political and economic terminology. they don't think of "anarchism" as a body of political theory, but as a mood or a pose—being rebellious, breaking all the rules, etc.
a quick comment on @Twitter / @TwitterDev and how @elonmusk's control of these entities now means that we can't trust "engagement" statistics from Twitter any more.
it's widely grasped that Musk's loyalists are doing whatever they can to maximize their visibility here.
(cont'd)
that's also meant that @elonmusk's instructing @Twitter / @TwitterDev staff to suppress *critics* of Musk and his right-wing #Twitter regime—it's to be noted that fierce independent champion of #FreeSpeech, @mtaibbi, has no opinion about Musk's Twitter censorship.
(cont'd)
most likely @mtaibbi knows that he *benefits* from @elonmusk's dictatorial meddlings with @Twitter and #Twitter visibility, so of course he's not going to complain about it—when pressed, he'll probably claim that it's Elon Musk's right to rule Twitter dictatorially.