One of the earliest fights for rights of #homosexuals/ #transgender was engaged by Magnus Hirschfeld, a Jewish doctor in Berlin, 1900-1930s. At the time, the term for what we consider ‘pedophiles’ was ‘pederasts.’ Conservative moralists would accuse any homosexual of pederasty.
They called homosexuals ‘immoral’ or ‘pathological.’ Hirschfeld explained homosexuality as an in-born natural condition. But Germany was deeply invested in culture of Männerbund and misogynistic masculinist rhetoric, which increasingly associated with nationalist sentiments.
Soon, these concepts merged with ideas of ‘German purity’ —antisemite Hans Blüher connected the idea of ‘effeminate homosexuals’ with Jewishness, and Männerbund with German-ness. He accused Jews of grooming and homosexuality/pederasty—that Jews were corrupting youth.
Then as now, right wing conservatives (Blüher called it the ‘conservative revolution’) used misinformation to stoke fears that Jewish people, homosexuals and others they didn’t approve were a danger to children. Calling them pedophiles was a way of turning people against them.
They wanted to destroy the image of homosexuals, transgender, but also any group that stood in their way (then: Jews/Social Democrats, now: transgender/Democrats). They do this by choosing a term rightly associated with monstrosity (pedophile) then label their opponents on repeat
Humans are about pattern recognition. If you see two things together often enough, you associate them. That’s their plan. The last thing the right wants is normalization of gay/trans parents with happy and healthy kids. Shouting ‘pedophile’ is a cheap trick. It worked for Nazis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The other day, a friend sent me an advert for a writing ‘camp.’ ‘Wouldn’t it be fun? we could go together!’ Camp: joining strangers at an unfamiliar place and being forced to interact. This is my hell. ‘But cool, like-minded people!’ Still nope. Why? On being an #introvert, a 🧵
My friend thought being an #introvert meant you only like socializing with people you find interesting—and as long as like-minded, it didn’t matter who or how many. That’s not introversion, though; that’s discernment and sensible curation. I, too, want interesting friends. But:
As an introvert, I want to hang with people ONE at a time. Two at once in some cases. Four is my max. And that’s even with people I know and love. I find social situations draining, not energizing. The effort that goes in is like running a long race but with no endorphin rush.
Since yesterday’s tweet (where I broke down a scientific study JK Rowling posted about blood/sex/gender), I’ve seen the argument that ‘sex is real’ because of chromosomes used to support anti- #transgender rhetoric. So today I’m sharing some biology in support of #TransRights
Let’s consider chromosomes first. The anti-trans argument says XX is female/woman and XY is male/man. That’s the gender binary. But biology isn’t binary—it’s messy. You can be born XXY or XYY. You may be born with aspects of both sexes along a spectrum. It’s also true for animals
A true XXY, what we call Klinefelter syndrome (47 chromosomes). 64% of those with the condition are never diagnosed (Jeannie Visootsak, MD, MSc 2014) and most who are only notice in puberty. About 1 in 500 are born with XXY. Now, XYY occurs in about 1 in 1000.
JK Rowling is up here suggesting blood is gendered and you have to get transfusion from the same bio sex you were assigned at birth (supporting her anti #transgender rhetoric) Before the blow up, some key information regarding the study she refers to—let’s get the facts 1/
There was a study. But: “The American Red Cross and the researchers themselves were quick to say the study is not definitive enough” and “three teams were from different countries, used different data sets and all had slightly different findings.” So what were the findings? 2/
The study suggested there may be a 2% decrease in how long a chromosomally male patient lives after cardiac arrest transfusion from a person who had been pregnant. (Loss: about one year of extra life) But the study was limited, using different data set. What would prove it? 2/
I’m about to share a strange story: I once curated a portion of the med history museum, using it to follow the history of midwifery, gynecology, and birth generally. The strangest device was a cloth covered pair of legs that opened into a pregnant womb—with cloth fetus. #history
1/ Now, this model had supposedly belonged to a student of Madame du Coudray, 18th c French midwife. I’d seen the originals in Rouen with some of my then-students; they are startling. Plush. Big squishy wombs. And that’s how she taught midwives—in France, midwives were women. But
2/ In 18th c England, men were taking over the practice often maligning women midwives as incompetent—they didn’t go to school, after all, and man midwives had a 14 week course! (What would women know about birth anyway, right?) they also wanted a model; they knew about Coudray
‘What is it like to do #book research’ —a historian’s thread about the perils and joys of the archive. 1/ I am in Berlin almost exclusively because of a single document. It exists in only one place: Humboldt U rare books. It has not been digitized. Thus, I took a flight.
2/
Arrived at the library today. I’d been warned I just pre-register and have a covid test, bring vaccines. No problem. Brandy rocks up to the check in with her nihilist Matrix black suit and is ready to rock. Like many archives, you are prohibited from being in outside bags.
3/ You usually are assigned a locker. You can bring your phone and PC. Except this library required you to have your own lock. I can buy one on site! Oh. Only with coins. No card or paper cash. I go in search of cash of the coin variety. Done. Lock acquired.
Then it goes wrong.