Dave: My reservation is removed and given to some else few days before elections. They have removed 4% reservation for Muslims in Karnataka. It's completely against a series of SC judgements. Completely unconstitutional! Why is it done overnight? On the eve of election?
Dave: Without any report? It's against the 1996 Statute. I am shocked at how the government can add this in the GO!
Sr Adv Sibal: Dr Ambedkar gave a speech in Columbia. They have misrepresented the statement. Indra Sawhney says that the statement said just the opposite.
Dave: On the basis of empirical data and material, it has been found that Muslims are a backward community in Karnataka and they deserve reservations. If you want to remove it, you remove it after a study. But your interim report says don't remove.
Dave: Where was the need to touch it? On the eve of elections, the elections are two days later...your lordships have held that reservations cannot be for political reasons.
Justice Nagarathna: The persons who have been now granted reservations - they were already granted reservations. What is the difference? The percentage goes up.
Sr Adv Gopal Sankarnarayanan: EWS includes us along with other groups. Earlier, the whole community was being treated as backward classes other than creamy layer.
GS: The two notifications - 2001 and this one stand side by side. That notification still holds but the only thing this notification does is that the percentage goes down. The reclassification goes away.
GS: One is that the last comprehensive report is Rahman Khan's report of 1995. That states that Muslims have lowest rate of literacy, highest drop out rate, 64% earn less than 6000.
Indra Sawhney says commission report is required.
Sibal: Since 1994-2023 i have been entitled. For 23 years I am backward and now suddenly I'm in general category? Without a study? Can it ever be? This is violative or 14 itself. What is stated is even worse- it says that what we were doing for 30 years was wrong?
Prof Ravivarma Kumar: Category 2B- it shows 0% which means that Muslims are not entitled to any reservations as SEBCs. So that means that admission of educational institutions have begun and we can give no benefits under 15(4).
Kumar: They have no power to transfer is from SEBCs to EWS category. Entire Christian community is included, Jains are included, Buddhists are included. All other minorities are included but not muslims? Why? On ground of their religion.
SG Mehta: They didn't answer what will happen if they give me a week to answer- other than hyperbole. Chinappa Reddy report didn't say muslims are backward. I will place some more commission reports. Muslims who are OBCs are already getting reservations.
Dave: Please don't make incorrect statements. Chinappa Reddy does say that all of Muslim community is SEBC.
SG Mehta: Please see- these are all muslims- Pinjara, mansoori, etc...They are all OBCs. I'm reiterating- please allow me to reply. There are no admissions starting.
Justice Nagarathna: This is the season of admissions. Schools reopen in June or even earlier. Whether they're going to act on this report, we must know.
SG Mehta: We're in April! 17th April- can something irreversible that can happen?
Justice Joseph: We're just saying that prima facie the order you have passed appears to suggests that the foundation of your decision making process is highly shaky and flawed.
Justice Nagarathna: It's on an interim report. The state could have waited for final report.
Justice Nagarathna: What was the great urgency?
SG Mehta: Unless they can say that there is some admissions- that is in May. We're in April. Without reply if your lordships decide it may be unfair.
Rohatgi: I am for Vokkaligas and Lingayats. This is a case of grant of the quota to someone else. I am only saying that unless something is to happen between today and Monday, it'd be unfair to pass an order. Because my quota will also go.
Rohatgi: Please see a 7 judge bench of the AP HC. In identical case- here the government wanted to give so the court said that in a positive order you can...
Justice Joseph: The GO seems to be in the teeth of commission's report.
Rohatgi: There are two questions - what does the report say? We will place that before you. We're right now going on presumption that the reports say that. Let us first see the reports.
Justice Nagarathna: Vokkaligas and Lingayats were earlier also reserved. Today what has happened is that 4% of reservations is completely knocked out - Muslims are without any reservations now.
Rohatgi: Give me three days to file a reply. I will file both the judgements. You file the report. I'll study it. Because it's not just cancellation of 4% but also grant of 4% reservations to us.
Dave: It's not that they're taken by surprise. This was served on 10th. I have seen the SG time and again- if HC makes order in evening, he takes it to CJI next morning.
Rohatgi: It was refiled on 5th April. The order was on 27th March. So that's some 9-10 days. Then they say we'll be affected. How will they be affected?
Rohatgi: Your lordships don't grant an ordinary stay unless it is shown that something irreversible will happen in 2-3 days. And today they come with a case devoid of anything...
Parties in mediation are like passengers hiring a taxi, with mediator being taxi driver who helps parties reach their destination. While there could be bumps & detours on the way, mediator helps parties preserve their commercial & personal relationships. : Kaul J
I don't believe that mediation should be done because judiciary is overloaded. It's a superior method of resolving disputes & must be tried first because it permits parties to structure their solution, which court can't do, being bound by prevalent law : Kaul J
Sr Adv CD Vaidyanathan (for Respondents) : Please allow me to file a reply. Can there be a permanent Prohibition? There can be ban during a health emergency but no total Prohibition.
Sr Adv Abhishek Singhvi: Previous State notification expired years ago.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal for govt: If it is injurious to public can the year on year argument be used? Can cancer depend on it?
Bench: Why don't you ban it permanently?
Sibal: That's for the Centre.
Bench: What you can't do directly? Can you do it indirectly?
'Commander in Thief' - Bombay High Court to shortly hear Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking quashing of an FIR in Mumbai for his alleged defamatory remarks against PM Narendra Modi
#SupremeCourt to hear shortly plea seeking contempt action against authorities in the State of Maharashtra over alleged failure to act against #hatespeech made against Muslims during rallies.
The bench comprising Justice Joseph & Justice Nagarathna had earlier expressed concerns over failure of authorities to act against #hatespeech; SG Mehta argued that petitioners were selective & didn't include hate speech against Hindus.
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: A PIL by a political leader will get transferred to CBI. Point two, the writ is filed on 27th and the order is passed on 28th. Third, in counter before HC I've denied the allegations.
Singhvi: Your lordships have not given them a chance! How can the probe be transferred? What is the point of jurisdictional bar if CBI can enter your area without consent?