Population as a whole don’t like wars. They don’t want to go into wars. They have to be fooled to reluctantly go into wars based on lies and misinformation.
Just looking at this ridiculous amount of money #MilitaryIndustrialComplex is wasting on Ukraine makes my blood boil with hate for our politicians and bureaucrats pushing for these regime changes and wars
AS LONG AS JULIAN ASSANGE IS IN PRISON, WE ARE ALL IN PRISON. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO TELL US WHAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO SEE, HEAR AND KNOW, WE NO LONGER LIVE IN A FREE SOCIETY #FreeAssange#FreeAssangeNOW
Your government is least interested in stopping to lie, instead they’re terribly upset at those who expose their lies.
PRAGUE - Tens of thousands of people are protesting against the government, for spending too much money and energy on Ukraine and ignoring the needs of their own people.
Inflation now at 15% the people call for the globalist government to resign.
Independent Texas needs American democracy then… right?
As if America doesn’t threaten other countries already with endless wars and sanctions, this lunatic CEO is asking for more with AI for his personal gains… what could go wrong
10 wars, millions dead, 1 Nobel peace prize and 0 indictments, 0 ICC hearings
Can you believe it…
What’s the weekly consignment to Ukraine these days $10 billion?
All wars are based on lies. Wars are old men lying, young men dying. Stop enlisting and dying for their lies.
The Ukraine war and the Iraq war are the same thing. They both wanted regime change, except Putin is considered a war criminal, Bush not
Of course Victoria Nuland from America discussed democracy with Sudan 🇸🇩… no wonder it’s doing great
Highest military spending since the end of cold war. Ukraine is pushing us slowly towards WW3 unless some sanity prevails and negotiations happen between NATO & Russia.
Truth about what’s going on in Sudan 🇸🇩. Russia wants to establish a naval base on the coast of Sudan in the Red Sea and America is opposing this deal.
Stop your proxy wars in Africa now and get out America and Russia.
US military spending trumps other major powers combined by a mile. Cut military spending, close the bases and recall troops as RFK suggests.
Every military conflict was a lie. Iraq was a lie and it destabilized the Middle East and spilled refugees into Syria etc. Afghanistan was a lie and the country literally fell back into the hands of Taliban. Ukraine Wasa lie and they keep lying.
Victoria Nuland the undersecretary of state a Bush era neocon - instead of promoting diplomacy, she lights matches wherever she meddles, agitating for endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and now in Ukraine.
Here’s an idea - stop wasting trillions of dollars on unnecessary wars & regime changes, take care of your own people, cities, borders, crimes and drug addiction issues
No wonder USA and NATO nations don’t want an independent investigation on #Nordstream pipelines
The War Department posted a reward for the capture of John Wilkes Booth, John Surrat, and David Harold, who murdered president Abraham Lincoln, April 20, 1865.
EVERY WAR IS BAD
EVERY BOMB IS BAD
US bio labs in China, Ukraine, Sudan that we know of. Where else do they have them, what else are they planning?
WHO - Never let a good crisis go to waste!
Dangerous bio labs operate in Sudan with polio and measles samples, which has been attacked… releasing deadly pathogens into a fleeing population.
What’s next… declare a health emergency, grab more powers.
Joe Rogan discusses Gen. Wesley Clark's statement that the US plans to take out seven countries, the fake propaganda used to justify the wars, and then millions of innocent people and children killed.
EVERY FREAKING WAR WAS BASED ON LIES & PROPAGANDA
Victoria Nuland is a warmonger
America be like…
American government experiments with biological agents like Serratia marcescens, Bascillus globigii and Aspergillus fumigatus on its own people on crowded places like New York subways and San Francisco.
These are the ones documented, imagine what they did undocumented.
The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein files reeks of hypocrisy and deliberate obfuscation, raising serious questions about their motives. Trump, along with Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, made bold promises to release the full scope of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes, fueling public expectations of transparency. Instead, they delivered a curated batch of already public information to a select group of pro-Trump influencers, sidestepping broad disclosure. This move, cloaked as a step toward openness, was a performative stunt that betrayed the spirit of their pledge. The administration’s pivot to claiming no “client list” exists, after years of speculation they themselves amplified, feels like a convenient reversal to shut down further scrutiny. This pattern of overpromising and underdelivering suggests a calculated effort to control the narrative, possibly to shield influential figures—potentially including Trump himself—from damaging revelations.
The contradiction surrounding Epstein’s death further erodes trust in the administration’s account. For years, Trump allies and conservative voices, including those now in power, fueled conspiracy theories that Epstein was murdered, pointing to the reported failure of video cameras at the Manhattan jail where he died. Now, the same administration claims to have clear video evidence showing no one entered or exited Epstein’s cell, confirming his suicide. This abrupt shift from questioning the official narrative to endorsing it—without releasing the footage for public verification—smacks of opportunism. It’s plausible that the administration is leveraging this newfound “evidence” to tie up loose ends and discourage further investigation into Epstein’s network, which could implicate powerful individuals. The refusal to share this alleged video only deepens suspicions that the administration is more interested in closing the case than uncovering the truth.
The possibility that the Trump administration is compromised by Epstein-related evidence cannot be dismissed. Trump’s documented ties to Epstein, including multiple flights on his private jet and their shared social circles in the 1990s, place him uncomfortably close to the scandal. The administration’s reluctance to release unredacted files, coupled with the selective distribution of documents to loyalists, suggests they may be suppressing information that could expose Trump or his allies. By hyping the release of the files and then delivering a dud, they appease their base’s demand for action while ensuring no new, incriminating details surface. This bait-and-switch tactic, paired with their sudden insistence on a tidy suicide narrative, points to a deeper fear: that the Epstein files contain evidence that could politically or legally devastate the administration. The hypocrisy lies in their public posturing as truth-seekers while their actions betray a desperate need to keep certain truths buried.
Democrats are compromised by Epstein evidence
Republicans are compromised by same evidence
They’re just blaming each other for political points to get elected… as soon as they get elected, they claim there’s no client list, Epstein killed himself
There has never been a war in history where 80% of the country has been destroyed, 100% of the population displaced, and 50% of the deaths are children.
NO COUNTRY CAN MATCH THE MILITARY MIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES 🇺🇸
The B-2 bomber just flew into Iran, struck 3 nuclear sites & returned — without even being detected. With 44 hours of continuous flight, 18,000+ km range, and a $2.1 billion price tag
The notion that repeating a lie often enough can make it seem like truth is a psychological tactic rooted in the "illusion of truth" effect. When people hear a statement repeatedly, their familiarity with it increases, and they are more likely to perceive it as credible, even if it lacks evidence. This is why propaganda often relies on relentless repetition through media, speeches, or social channels to entrench ideas in the public psyche. Historically, this technique has been used to manipulate narratives, from wartime propaganda to modern misinformation campaigns. Conspiracy theories, often dismissed as fringe, can gain traction this way, especially when repeated across platforms like X or through influential voices. When some theories are later validated, it fuels distrust in institutions, as people feel vindicated in their skepticism.
One striking example is the MKUltra program, a CIA operation that began as a conspiracy theory in the 1970s. Rumors circulated that the U.S. government was conducting mind-control experiments on unwitting citizens, which were dismissed as paranoid delusions. However, declassified documents in 1975 revealed that MKUltra was real: the CIA had conducted illegal experiments using drugs like LSD and psychological torture on hundreds of subjects, often without consent. The revelation, uncovered through the Church Committee hearings, confirmed what was once ridiculed, showing how government secrecy can lend credence to conspiracy theories when the truth emerges. This case illustrates how repeated whispers of a "lie" can turn out to reflect a hidden reality, especially when authorities deny it initially.
Another example is the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, which fueled conspiracy theories about medical misconduct. For decades, African American communities speculated about unethical government experiments, often dismissed as baseless fears. Yet, in 1972, it was revealed that the U.S. Public Health Service had deliberately withheld treatment from Black men with syphilis for 40 years to study the disease’s progression, even after penicillin became available. The exposure of this atrocity validated long-standing distrust in medical institutions, particularly among marginalized groups. These cases show how the repetition of a "lie" can plant seeds of truth, especially when systemic cover-ups unravel, reinforcing the power of persistent narratives to shape perceptions and, sometimes, uncover reality.
The notion that Earth’s collective debt stands at $315 trillion, ballooning daily, raises a chilling question: who is the creditor for this astronomical sum? In truth, this debt isn’t owed to some extraterrestrial bank but to ourselves—governments, institutions, and individuals entangled in a web of financial obligations. Central banks, like the Federal Reserve, issue currency and bonds, which governments borrow to fund deficits, while banks multiply debt through fractional reserve lending. This creates a cycle where money is conjured from thin air, lent with interest, and repaid with labor and resources. The system’s genius and flaw lie in its self-perpetuation: new debt must be issued to service old debt, ensuring the total never shrinks. This isn’t a debt to a single entity but a global ledger of promises, binding nations and people to an endless treadmill of repayment.
The architects of this perpetual inflationary system are harder to pin down, but its roots trace to modern central banking and fiat currency, unshackled from gold or tangible assets. In the early 20th century, governments and bankers embraced policies that prioritized economic growth through controlled inflation, debasing money’s value over time. This incentivizes spending and borrowing but erodes savings and wages, effectively enslaving populations to a cycle of earning and owing. Inflation acts like a hidden tax, redistributing wealth upward to those who control assets while the masses labor to stay afloat. The system wasn’t invented by a single villain but evolved through pragmatic choices, each step rationalized as necessary for stability or progress. Yet, its outcome is a debt spiral where repayment becomes mathematically impossible without exponential growth or systemic collapse.
Escaping this death spiral demands radical rethinking. First, nations could reject fiat currency, returning to asset-backed money like gold to limit reckless debt creation, though this risks economic stagnation. Alternatively, coordinated debt jubilees—wiping clean global ledgers—could reset the system, but this would spark chaos among creditors and savers. A bolder path is decentralizing finance through cryptocurrencies or local barter systems, bypassing central banks entirely. These solutions face fierce resistance from entrenched powers, so public awareness and grassroots pressure are critical. The debt trap thrives on complacency; breaking free requires collective will to dismantle a system that profits by keeping humanity in chains.
The failure to name, defame, indict, or arrest the clients of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sean "Diddy" Combs, despite their own high-profile arrests, points to a troubling pattern of selective accountability that protects the powerful. This seems to run across party lines, not specific to Democrat or Republican. These individuals operated within elite circles, allegedly facilitating or engaging in egregious acts of exploitation and trafficking, yet the focus remains narrowly on them as individuals rather than the broader networks they served. The clients—often wealthy, influential figures in politics, business, or entertainment—appear shielded by a system that prioritizes discretion over justice. This suggests a deliberate effort to limit exposure, perhaps to avoid destabilizing institutions or reputations tied to these networks. The lack of transparency fuels suspicion that those in power are complicit in preserving a status quo where the elite evade scrutiny, leaving only the orchestrators to face consequences while their patrons remain untouched.
This disparity in accountability undermines public trust in the justice system and perpetuates a culture of impunity for the privileged. If Epstein, Maxwell, and Combs were indeed central to criminal enterprises, their clients were not mere bystanders but active participants who enabled and benefited from these schemes. The absence of indictments or even public naming of these individuals raises questions about whether investigations are intentionally curtailed to protect those with the means to influence outcomes. Systemic barriers, such as sealed records, private settlements, or prosecutorial reluctance to challenge powerful figures, may be at play, ensuring that the client lists remain shrouded in secrecy. By failing to pursue these clients, authorities risk signaling that justice is a privilege reserved for the few, leaving victims without full reckoning and society grappling with the unsettling reality that some are above the law.
A thread on Epstein, Maxwell, Diddy and their criminal elite sex trafficking networks👇
The National Institutes of Health has shut down research labs accused of conducting deadly experiments on thousands of beagles over the past 40+ years.