Population as a whole don’t like wars. They don’t want to go into wars. They have to be fooled to reluctantly go into wars based on lies and misinformation.
Just looking at this ridiculous amount of money #MilitaryIndustrialComplex is wasting on Ukraine makes my blood boil with hate for our politicians and bureaucrats pushing for these regime changes and wars
AS LONG AS JULIAN ASSANGE IS IN PRISON, WE ARE ALL IN PRISON. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO TELL US WHAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO SEE, HEAR AND KNOW, WE NO LONGER LIVE IN A FREE SOCIETY #FreeAssange#FreeAssangeNOW
Your government is least interested in stopping to lie, instead they’re terribly upset at those who expose their lies.
PRAGUE - Tens of thousands of people are protesting against the government, for spending too much money and energy on Ukraine and ignoring the needs of their own people.
Inflation now at 15% the people call for the globalist government to resign.
Independent Texas needs American democracy then… right?
As if America doesn’t threaten other countries already with endless wars and sanctions, this lunatic CEO is asking for more with AI for his personal gains… what could go wrong
10 wars, millions dead, 1 Nobel peace prize and 0 indictments, 0 ICC hearings
Can you believe it…
What’s the weekly consignment to Ukraine these days $10 billion?
All wars are based on lies. Wars are old men lying, young men dying. Stop enlisting and dying for their lies.
The Ukraine war and the Iraq war are the same thing. They both wanted regime change, except Putin is considered a war criminal, Bush not
Of course Victoria Nuland from America discussed democracy with Sudan 🇸🇩… no wonder it’s doing great
Highest military spending since the end of cold war. Ukraine is pushing us slowly towards WW3 unless some sanity prevails and negotiations happen between NATO & Russia.
Truth about what’s going on in Sudan 🇸🇩. Russia wants to establish a naval base on the coast of Sudan in the Red Sea and America is opposing this deal.
Stop your proxy wars in Africa now and get out America and Russia.
US military spending trumps other major powers combined by a mile. Cut military spending, close the bases and recall troops as RFK suggests.
Every military conflict was a lie. Iraq was a lie and it destabilized the Middle East and spilled refugees into Syria etc. Afghanistan was a lie and the country literally fell back into the hands of Taliban. Ukraine Wasa lie and they keep lying.
Victoria Nuland the undersecretary of state a Bush era neocon - instead of promoting diplomacy, she lights matches wherever she meddles, agitating for endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and now in Ukraine.
Here’s an idea - stop wasting trillions of dollars on unnecessary wars & regime changes, take care of your own people, cities, borders, crimes and drug addiction issues
No wonder USA and NATO nations don’t want an independent investigation on #Nordstream pipelines
The War Department posted a reward for the capture of John Wilkes Booth, John Surrat, and David Harold, who murdered president Abraham Lincoln, April 20, 1865.
EVERY WAR IS BAD
EVERY BOMB IS BAD
US bio labs in China, Ukraine, Sudan that we know of. Where else do they have them, what else are they planning?
WHO - Never let a good crisis go to waste!
Dangerous bio labs operate in Sudan with polio and measles samples, which has been attacked… releasing deadly pathogens into a fleeing population.
What’s next… declare a health emergency, grab more powers.
Joe Rogan discusses Gen. Wesley Clark's statement that the US plans to take out seven countries, the fake propaganda used to justify the wars, and then millions of innocent people and children killed.
EVERY FREAKING WAR WAS BASED ON LIES & PROPAGANDA
Victoria Nuland is a warmonger
America be like…
American government experiments with biological agents like Serratia marcescens, Bascillus globigii and Aspergillus fumigatus on its own people on crowded places like New York subways and San Francisco.
These are the ones documented, imagine what they did undocumented.
Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.
Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.
A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇
Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.
In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.
In the shadowed annals of empire, the invasion of Iraq revealed the blueprint: invent an existential threat, amplify it through every megaphone of power, then unleash hell under the banner of salvation. Weapons of mass destruction—those ghostly specters that never materialized—served as the perfect phantom, terrifying enough to silence dissent yet vague enough to evade accountability when the lie collapsed. The true prize was never aluminum tubes or yellowcake; it was the second-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, waiting to be liberated from a dictator and delivered into the hands of Western corporations. The war was sold as a moral crusade, but the receipts came later in the form of no-bid contracts and decades of guaranteed crude flowing through friendly pipelines.
Venezuela now stands in the crosshairs of the same script, only the boogeyman has been rebranded for a new century. Where once we feared mushroom clouds, we are now instructed to tremble before weapons of mass intoxication—tons of cocaine allegedly funneled through Caracas by a regime painted as the kingpin of global narco-terrorism. The opioid crisis ravaging American towns becomes the emotional battering ram, the humanitarian catastrophe of Venezuelan migrants the moral veneer, while the real objective glitters beneath the Orinoco Belt: the largest oil reserves on the planet, currently outside the grip of ExxonMobil and Chevron. The pattern is identical—demonize, destabilize, invade or install a compliant regime—only this time the pretext is not yellowcake but white powder, and the war will be waged not with tanks rolling across the desert but with sanctions, proxy forces, and perhaps, when the moment is ripe, a "limited intervention" to stop the drugs and secure the wells. History does not repeat; it simply changes costumes.
MOST OF EUROPE HAS DEVOLVED INTO AN ORWELLIAN DYSTOPIA PRIORITIZING IMMIGRANTS OVER CITIZENS, PRIORITIZING CENSORSHIP AND TYRANNY OVER FREE SPEECH
Britain's justice system has become a grotesque betrayal of its own people, prioritizing the leniency of foreign criminals over the safety and dignity of native citizens. In cases where migrants commit heinous acts like assaulting vulnerable young girls, courts hand down sentences that are laughably mild, often mere slaps on the wrist that allow perpetrators to roam free far too soon. Meanwhile, ordinary Brits who dare to protest against this influx of danger—standing up for their communities and demanding accountability—are slammed with harsher punishments, locked away for longer periods as if their righteous anger is the real crime. This inverted priority exposes a government more concerned with appeasing international optics and virtue-signaling tolerance than protecting the innocent, leaving families shattered and streets unsafe while rewarding those who prey on the weak.
By shielding immigrant offenders with soft sentencing and aggressive policing of dissent, Britain has effectively sided with the predators, eroding the social contract that once promised security and justice for all. Citizens watch in horror as resources pour into housing and supporting migrants, even those with criminal records, while victims of their violence receive scant support or closure. This systemic failure fosters a culture of fear and resentment, where the rule of law bends to multicultural mandates rather than upholding the rights of the law-abiding majority. In doing so, the nation not only fails its people but actively undermines their trust, paving the way for deeper divisions and a society where native lives seem expendable in the name of misguided compassion.