Population as a whole don’t like wars. They don’t want to go into wars. They have to be fooled to reluctantly go into wars based on lies and misinformation.

#MilitaryIndustrialComplex combined with corrupt #media push nations into wars. A 🧵👇

Just looking at this ridiculous amount of money #MilitaryIndustrialComplex is wasting on Ukraine makes my blood boil with hate for our politicians and bureaucrats pushing for these regime changes and wars
AS LONG AS JULIAN ASSANGE IS IN PRISON, WE ARE ALL IN PRISON. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO TELL US WHAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO SEE, HEAR AND KNOW, WE NO LONGER LIVE IN A FREE SOCIETY
#FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW Image
Image
Your government is least interested in stopping to lie, instead they’re terribly upset at those who expose their lies. Image
The #MilitaryIndustrialComplex doesn’t want peace, they’re war mongers

EU wants war
NATO wants war
America wants war

You’ll never have peace if one side never wants peace. Simple.
PRAGUE - Tens of thousands of people are protesting against the government, for spending too much money and energy on Ukraine and ignoring the needs of their own people.

Inflation now at 15% the people call for the globalist government to resign.

#MilitaryIndustrialComplextwitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
Independent Texas needs American democracy then… right? Image
Image
As if America doesn’t threaten other countries already with endless wars and sanctions, this lunatic CEO is asking for more with AI for his personal gains… what could go wrong

10 wars, millions dead, 1 Nobel peace prize and 0 indictments, 0 ICC hearings Image
Can you believe it… Image
What’s the weekly consignment to Ukraine these days $10 billion? Image
All wars are based on lies. Wars are old men lying, young men dying. Stop enlisting and dying for their lies. Image
Image
The Ukraine war and the Iraq war are the same thing. They both wanted regime change, except Putin is considered a war criminal, Bush not

Of course Victoria Nuland from America discussed democracy with Sudan 🇸🇩… no wonder it’s doing great Image
Highest military spending since the end of cold war. Ukraine is pushing us slowly towards WW3 unless some sanity prevails and negotiations happen between NATO & Russia. ImageImage
Truth about what’s going on in Sudan 🇸🇩. Russia wants to establish a naval base on the coast of Sudan in the Red Sea and America is opposing this deal.

Stop your proxy wars in Africa now and get out America and Russia.

US military spending trumps other major powers combined by a mile. Cut military spending, close the bases and recall troops as RFK suggests. Image
Every military conflict was a lie. Iraq was a lie and it destabilized the Middle East and spilled refugees into Syria etc. Afghanistan was a lie and the country literally fell back into the hands of Taliban. Ukraine Wasa lie and they keep lying.
Victoria Nuland the undersecretary of state a Bush era neocon - instead of promoting diplomacy, she lights matches wherever she meddles, agitating for endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and now in Ukraine.

@codepink petition for awareness

codepink.org/bidenfirenuland Image
@sahouraxo is right - wherever Victoria Nuland goes, death and destruction follows Image
Military spending, 2022.

China🇨🇳: $291 billion
India🇮🇳: $66 billion
Russia🇷🇺: $61 billion
UK🇬🇧: $55 billion
France🇫🇷: $51 billion
Japan🇯🇵: $48 billion
Germany🇩🇪: $46 billion
Italy🇮🇹: $33 billion
Brazil🇧🇷: $20 billion
Iran🇮🇷: $6 billion

Total: $677 billion

US🇺🇸 military… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
Who cares if other people in other countries die… we are safe… right? Image
Is WHO declaring an emergency now Image
Hey American politicians and #DeepState

Here’s an idea - stop wasting trillions of dollars on unnecessary wars & regime changes, take care of your own people, cities, borders, crimes and drug addiction issues

Both Republicans & Democrats are part of #MilitaryIndustrialComplex Image
No wonder USA and NATO nations don’t want an independent investigation on #Nordstream pipelines Image
The War Department posted a reward for the capture of John Wilkes Booth, John Surrat, and David Harold, who murdered president Abraham Lincoln, April 20, 1865. Image
EVERY WAR IS BAD
EVERY BOMB IS BAD Image
US bio labs in China, Ukraine, Sudan that we know of. Where else do they have them, what else are they planning? Image
WHO - Never let a good crisis go to waste!

Dangerous bio labs operate in Sudan with polio and measles samples, which has been attacked… releasing deadly pathogens into a fleeing population.

What’s next… declare a health emergency, grab more powers.

Joe Rogan discusses Gen. Wesley Clark's statement that the US plans to take out seven countries, the fake propaganda used to justify the wars, and then millions of innocent people and children killed.

EVERY FREAKING WAR WAS BASED ON LIES & PROPAGANDA

Victoria Nuland is a warmonger Image
America be like… Image
American government experiments with biological agents like Serratia marcescens, Bascillus globigii and Aspergillus fumigatus on its own people on crowded places like New York subways and San Francisco.

These are the ones documented, imagine what they did undocumented.
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DeepBlueCrypto

Apr 7
Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #33 for your awareness👇 Image
Probably nothing — Quantum Computing Image
Read 17 tweets
Apr 2
In just three months as the 47th President, Donald Trump has governed with a ferocity that seems fueled by the trials of his past—indictments, investigations, assassination attempts, and impeachments—emerging not as a man diminished, but as one emboldened to deliver on his promises with unrelenting focus. His campaign pledges, once dismissed by critics as bombastic rhetoric, are materializing at a breakneck pace, reflecting a leader who thrives under pressure and channels adversity into action. From sweeping border security measures to economic policies aimed at revitalizing American industry, Trump’s early tenure feels like a defiant rebuttal to those who doubted his resolve, proving that the chaos of his journey has only sharpened his determination to reshape the nation in his image.

What’s most striking is how Trump has turned promises into tangible outcomes, defying the inertia that often bogs down presidencies. He’s tackled illegal immigration with a vigor that’s already shifting the landscape, while imposing tariffs to bolster domestic production, moves that echo his “America First” mantra and resonate with a base hungry for results. Gas, grocery and egg prices have eased, a practical win for everyday Americans, while his administration’s bold strokes—like dismantling bureaucratic excess and confronting global adversaries—signal a rejection of the status quo. For a man who’s faced relentless scrutiny, Trump’s first 90 days suggest not just survival, but a triumphant assertion of his vision, delivering a governance style as unapologetic and unconventional as the path that brought him back to power.

A thread on politics and politicians👇Image
Looking at the massive fraud, corruption and abuse revealed by @DOGE it seems obvious now Image
Read 29 tweets
Mar 12
“EPSTEIN CLIENTS ARE ABOVE THE LAW”

The statement that "more squirrels and raccoons have been arrested than Epstein clients" highlights a stark disparity between the enforcement of minor, even absurd, regulations and the apparent reluctance to pursue justice against powerful individuals implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network. In late 2024, the case of Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon captured public attention when New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation raided Mark Longo’s home, seizing and euthanizing these animals over claims of illegal possession and rabies risks. The operation involved multiple agents and hours of effort, showcasing a swift and decisive response to what many saw as a trivial violation. This incident, amplified by social media outrage, underscores how authorities can mobilize resources to "arrest" or address wildlife-related issues, even when the targets are harmless pets, while seemingly ignoring far graver human crimes.

In contrast, the Epstein case—despite overwhelming evidence of a sex trafficking operation involving influential figures—has seen remarkably little accountability for his clients. Epstein, a financier with ties to politicians, billionaires, and royalty, was arrested in 2019 and died in custody, officially ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories abound. Court documents unsealed in recent years name numerous associates, yet few, if any, of these high-profile individuals have faced arrest or prosecution. The disparity fuels public frustration: while a squirrel’s fate can prompt a government raid, the powerful men who allegedly exploited minors alongside Epstein remain largely untouchable, shielded by wealth, status, or legal loopholes. This juxtaposition paints a compelling picture of a system that prioritizes the enforcement of petty rules over the pursuit of justice for heinous crimes, leaving society to question where true accountability lies.

A thread on Epstein and his clients👇Image
Image
Read 52 tweets
Mar 8
Infographics are essential to convey information to people in the modern world.

A thread 🧵 #31 for your awareness👇 Image
Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 4
The influence of corporate money in politics is a pervasive force that often shapes government inaction on issues like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Companies like Bayer and Monsanto, with their deep pockets and extensive lobbying networks, have the resources to sway policymakers in their favor. They contribute millions to political campaigns, ensuring that elected officials remain sympathetic to their interests. This financial leverage creates a system where legislation or regulation that might harm these corporations’ bottom lines—such as banning or heavily restricting GMOs—is quietly sidelined. The revolving door between government agencies and corporate boardrooms only deepens this entanglement, as former industry executives often take regulatory roles, bringing their biases with them.

Beyond direct political influence, these corporations have mastered the art of shaping public perception through partnerships with universities and media outlets. By funding research at academic institutions, they can produce studies that downplay or dismiss health concerns related to GMOs, lending a veneer of scientific legitimacy to their products. These studies are then amplified by media campaigns, often subtly sponsored or influenced by the same corporations, to reassure the public that GMOs are safe and necessary for feeding a growing population. Dissenting voices—independent researchers or whistleblowers raising red flags about potential health risks—are drowned out or discredited, leaving regulators with a convenient excuse: the “science” isn’t conclusive enough to justify action.

Finally, the government’s inertia can be attributed to a broader economic calculus that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term public health. GMOs are deeply embedded in the agricultural industry, which contributes significantly to GDP and employs millions. Disrupting this system by cracking down on GMO foods would ripple through the economy, threatening jobs, trade relationships, and corporate profits—consequences no administration wants to face. Politicians, wary of being labeled as anti-business or anti-progress, opt for the path of least resistance, allowing these food giants to operate with minimal oversight. Meanwhile, any evidence of harm to human health is buried under bureaucratic delays or dismissed as anecdotal, preserving the status quo where profit trumps precaution.

A thread on health and wellness👇
THE MORE YOU CONSUME ULTRA-PROCESSED FOODS THE WORSE OFF YOUR HEALTH GETS Image
Read 14 tweets
Feb 24
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) promises a transformative shift by prioritizing transparency and rebuilding public trust in a system that many Americans have grown skeptical of, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. His commitment to "radical transparency" addresses a core issue: the erosion of confidence in federal health agencies due to perceived corporate influence and opaque decision-making. By vowing to dismantle conflicts of interest—such as the revolving door between regulatory bodies and the pharmaceutical industry—Kennedy aims to ensure that health policies serve the public, not profit-driven corporations. This approach could restore faith in institutions like the CDC and FDA, making them more accountable and responsive to citizens’ needs rather than entrenched interests.

Beyond transparency, Kennedy’s focus on tackling the chronic disease epidemic offers a bold departure from the status quo. He has signaled an intent to investigate previously "taboo" or under-scrutinized contributors to poor health—ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins like glyphosates, and overreliance on pharmaceuticals—through rigorous, unbiased science. This proactive stance contrasts with the reactive, symptom-management model that dominates current healthcare. By shifting HHS’s emphasis toward prevention and root causes, Kennedy could reduce the staggering burden of conditions like obesity, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders, particularly among children, potentially saving billions in healthcare costs and improving quality of life for millions.

Finally, Kennedy’s outsider perspective and willingness to challenge entrenched norms could revitalize an agency often criticized for bureaucratic inertia. His history as an environmental lawyer and advocate demonstrates a tenacity for taking on powerful entities, suggesting he won’t shy away from overhauling outdated systems or questioning long-held assumptions, such as the childhood vaccine schedule’s scope. While his skepticism of certain medical orthodoxies has sparked controversy, his pledge to let science guide policy—coupled with a commission to address chronic disease—offers a chance to modernize HHS. If he succeeds in aligning the agency’s vast resources with a mission to "Make America Healthy Again," Kennedy could turn HHS into a dynamic force for genuine health reform, rather than a caretaker of a broken status quo.

A thread on big Pharma, vaccines and health👇
No they won’t Image
Read 63 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(