286. Pronouncing Operative Portion Without Preparing Entire Judgment Is Unbecoming Of A Judicial Officer: Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal Of Civil Judge
The Registrar General High Court of Karnataka &Anr v. Sri M.Narasimha Prasad
288. Arbitration | Section 34 Application Must Be Filed Within 90 Days Limitation To Claim Exclusion Of Period When Court Remain Closed : Supreme Court
Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita v Walchandnagar Industries Ltd
Bombay High Court is hearing a PIL challenging the proposed renaming of Aurangabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar. #BombayHighCourt
A division bench of Acting Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice Sandeep V Marne is hearing the matter. #BombayHighCourt
Last month, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the petitioner's Special Leave Petition against Union's approval for the name change as the matter is already pending before the Bombay High Court #BombayHighCourt
Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra (while providing the bench with facts and evidence in case): This is really becoming an exercise in futility. This is not how investigation goes on. CBI supported us. It's an absurdity, never seen something like this.
#DelhiHighCourt directs Competition Commission of India to take up the applications moved by alliance of start-ups challenging #Google’s new in-app user choice billing policy and deciding the same on or before April 26.
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela pronounced the order on the plea moved by Alliance of Digital India Foundation, a body representing the interests of various stakeholders including start-ups and app developers.
Court: There is no impediment, legal or otherwise, in directing the CCI to take up the applications under Section 42 of Competition Act as filed by the petitioner for hearing and considering the same in accordance with law on or before 26 April, 2023.