Claiming UKR is landlocked militarily requires overlooking Crimea's significance to Putin. It's key in controlling access to the crucial Caspian Sea, Don-Volga Canal, and a major portion of Russia's extensive inland waterway system. #Ukraine#MilitaryPerspective
In 2021, Putin emphasized the waterway's importance, pledging billions for development to connect the Black Sea and the Baltic.
According to Zeihan, nations with access to navigable rivers enjoy a strategic edge in trade, military operations, and resource distribution, ultimately shaping the global landscape and driving national prosperity.
The illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 enabled Russia to construct the Kerch Strait Bridge, granting control over traffic into the Sea of Azov and its vital inland waterways network.
Russia utilized the bridge to restrict ship sizes entering Mariupol Port, aiming to reduce its significance.
Ukraine responded with the revealing film "Crimea Bridge: Made With Love!" showcasing the bridge's true intent. #MariupolPort#CrimeaBridge
Tensions escalated, as evidenced by the Nov 25, 2018 incident when Russia seized Ukrainian ships, spotlighting growing concerns over river traffic in the years leading up to war #MaritimeConflictrferl.org/a/explainer-ke…
Why did Russia want to control shipping near Mariupol? Because of its location and strategic importance. Located near the Don River mouth, Mariupol exercises certain legal authority over nearby vessel traffic, something Russia finds disconcerting.
In case of hostilities, Ukraine could blockade Russia's inland waterway network by targeting vessel traffic entering or exiting the system. And that's precisely what happened when war broke out.
It caused an enormous backlog of traffic heading to Russian farms and facilities in the Caspian and inland rivers. Here is a screengrab of AIS traffic on 17 Feb 2022 via ARX
Essentially #Mariupol is to Russia what New Orleans is to the United States: the key gateway to the nation's interior.
Except, of course, the US owns New Orleans and Russia does not own Mariupol. #Mississippi#neworleans
So, by saying "Ukraine is Land-Locked" Milley is discounting one of the most important - and possibly THE most important - reasons for the Russian invasion.
Strike 1 General Milley
So assuming we forget the rising tensions in the Sea of Azov and the strategic importance of Mariupol there is another problem with Milley's comment.
To say the military actions were essentially landlocked you have to ignore many factors.
You have to ignore the diversion of time and effort put into securing Ukraine's largest port city - Odesa - from Russian attack. This fortification was successful but resource-intensive npr.org/2022/03/22/108…
To gain a balanced perspective, consider factors emphasized by US Naval Academy scholar @WWATMD in his insightful @WarOnTheRocks essay. He argues that although primarily a land war, it's also a naval war:
To claim the war is "landlocked" you have to ignore:
Retaking Snake Island
Sinking The Moskva
Attack on the Crimea Strait Bridge
Attack on the Nord-Stream Pipeline
The Sea-drone attack on the Russian fleet
The drone attack on Crimean oil tanker terminals
Attacks on commercial shipping.
American Drones getting harassed over the Black Sea
Mine Warfare.
The Montreux Convention
You must ignore all this to even suggest this is a "landlocked war"
Strike 2 General Milley
I understand critics may claim I took his comment out of context, arguing he referred only to the war's staging and onset so here's the complete statement: "The fundamentals are different, in the sense that—just the terrain and the weather...
"It’s obvious. You’ve got a landlocked country of Ukraine, with a land border with Russia. And Russia was able to mobilize and place into assembly areas and attack positions for an invasion, you know, 140,000, 150,000 troops..
just in the lead echelons, with another a hundred thousand behind them, on multiple axes of advance across a land border. So then they have ground lines of communication."
That's what he said but there is still one major problem.
Landlocked countries are at or near the source of the river system, the Upper Basin, and Headwaters. /cont
Navigating large rivers presents armies with significant challenges, including logistical hurdles, unpredictable currents, and potential bottlenecks. These factors severly impact troop movement, supply lines, and military strategy. #RiverineChallenges
“Throughout history wars have been lost because of armies not crossing rivers.” General George S. Patton
Ukraine's abundance of large rivers presents both challenges and strategic opportunities. Difficult to cross, they've played a crucial role in impeding Russia's initial advances, with bridges sacrificed around the nation and flooded to protect Kyiv.
Ukraine's vast river systems also serve as vital transport routes and natural barriers, influencing the nation's geopolitical landscape, and the shape of the war itself. #Ukraine#Rivers
That's Strike 3 General Milley
Ok, Ok... but John you're being a little over dramatic.
It's just something that slipped out in an interview.
It's a simple mistake... give the guy a break.
Right?
Yes and No
Yes because it was a simple mistake but no for two reasons:
1) the Pentagon has a vast media arm and it would be simple for Genral Milley to correct the record
2) Minor yet indicative of today's leaders' mindset, after 2 decades of GWOT, our nation's seablindness is concerning. Few, besides easily-dismissed #navalists, have sought a correction.
Words matter.
Shipping matters.
The Navy matters.
Rivers and waterways matter.
Matter deeply
And for the world's largest island nation - The United States - fighting sea-blindness matters.
It's worrisome that the Pentagon, led by a Joint Chiefs Chairman and a Secretary of Defense both from the Army, may have overlooked the true importance of the blue parts on the map.
IMHO we can not let them - or global policy leaders - forget the critical role waterways play.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
use Wall Street capital to dominate shipping and build a huge navy.
The Democrats are worse. America has an abundance of energy, an abundance farmland, an abundance of capital but can’t get exports out through our broken ports and we have no American ships to put them on.
My dear friend, fellow US Merchant Marine veteran, @MaritimeCollege shipmate, and @gCaptain contributor Dr. Sal is making waves 🌊. What began as a favor, covering a @BBC interview so I could be at my daughter's birthday, has grown into a tsunami of maritime expertise...
...historical insights, and - YES! - investigative journalism! 🚢
His channel has reached top government officials, influenced maritime policy, held Admirals accountable, promoted critical #Sealift, advocated for @AMMWWII veterans & diminished seablindness worldwide 🌍
I'm honored to have played a small part in its journey and success!
(Y'all are welcome for hounding Sal to improve the thumbnails! 😉)
The US Navy thinks warships are expensive only because they do not understand finance. $14B for a carrier is nothing. NOTHING to Wall Street. China knows this, that’s why they are outbuilding us.
But $14B is a lot for congress. This is why we must help shipyards fix capital.
It is ABSOLUTE critical to understand the financial mechanisms that allow the IS Government to pump $25B in bailouts into a regional bank without batting an eye. If we want ships must understand that shipyards are corporate entities that are able to access enormous amounts of
One thing about the US Military that continually shocks & surprises me is their willingness to share ideas openly in full view of the public.
Sure lots of secrets about weapon capabilities & such are classified but our crown jewels are not hightech weapons its our warriors minds
And that is open for all to see. If you follow the right people here on Twitter you will see where military strategy is moving and @CIMSEC@USNIProceedings USMC Gazette will fill in most gaps.
90% of everything you consume comes via ship. The shipping container is the #1 invention that’s lifted people worldwide out of poverty & improved everyone’s lives but SVB and VCs have labeled shipping as dirty & uninvestable
I know because I was as COO of an MIT shipping startup
And it’s not just commercial shipping. It is also naval technology.
The startup industry picks favorites and those favorites do not align with the greater good. They align with the valleys “culture” of silicon Valley.