1/ One for #TeamEnglish — some ideas for explaining what we mean by analysis 🧵
Students struggle with what analysis is. But the reality is we do it all the time. I've found that showing them images and asking them what they are images are *of* helps. Take these two images:
2/ Some students say, 'hands' or 'fist', but most don't — most say things like 'aggression', 'tension', 'generosity', 'openness', 'begging'.
3/ When I looked at these images with Year 11, one student (without any prompting), said that they represented Scrooge's Stave 1 and Stave 6 selves respectively, drawing on 'tight-fisted hand at the grindstone' and comparing it to his open-handed generosity.
4/ The point is: we think analytically. We look at *things*, material things, and we use them to talk about other things. Most human metaphors are so commonplace they pass by unnoticed:
- I'm on board with this.
- That broke me.
- I couldn't see it from her perspective.
5/ Analysis stems from this fact of human interaction: language used in perfectly literal form seldom does the job. The trick is to get students to notice.
6/ I was looking extracts from near the beginning of *The Handmaid's Tale* with Year 9, and I started with images that related to the extract. I wanted them to understand that the way they spoke about the images was the way they should think and write about the text.
7/ This was the first image:
8/ The first student said, 'This is an image of sacrifice.' I asked him how he knew this. He said that it was also an image of pain, but it was a pain on behalf of others.
I asked if it wasn't just a crucifix.
9/ 'Yeah,' another said, but to most people it's so much more than that.
'Most people?'
'Yeah. It depends on who you are. Different things mean different things to different people.'
Exactly. This is what I think we're asking students to do when we're asking them to analyse.
10/ We're getting them to realise that language means different things to different people in different contexts, and that probing this is an interesting to do, because it's how we make meaning. It's how we learn. And, also, it's fun.
11/ We came up with a formula for how we might read analytically. Normally, I hate this way of doing things, but this seemed to work quite nicely:
**Thing + how it's used = idea**
12/ The key is that things in the physical world only really mean anything of any significance in the abstract. I asked the students to think about what our school actually was.
13/ We discussed whether or not it was the building, and we agreed that it couldn't be, because we could knock the school down, build a new one, give it the same name and it would be the same school. The *same*? Well, they answered, the important bits would be the same.
14/ The school's ethos, rules, reputation — they'd still be the same. And what do all those important things have in common? They're all abstract: they're things we believe in, things that exist in the realm of the mind but not materially.
15/ Does that mean that the material doesn't matter? No: without the material, the *concrete*, there is nothing to anchor ideas to. There's no common frame of reference. Nobody learns anything in a wholly abstract school.
16/ Slowly but surely, I realised I was teaching my students about semiotics in order to get them to grasp what I mean when I ask them to analyse.
To analyse, then, is to probe the ways in which the concrete relates to the abstract.
17/ When noticing that the Commander's Wife uses a 'cane', students were then able to quickly grasp that this has ideas attached to it which made sense when they thought about the *thing* and *how it's used*:
- She's vulnerable
- She might feel fragile
18/ - Her movement will be limited, therefore she might feel limited in other ways
- She's trapped in ways that go beyond the trapping of a body in physical space
- She might feel clumsy and awkward
And so on.
19/ All they did was realise that things relate to ideas: the concrete and the abstract team up to make meaning. Analysis, then, is one of the most natural things to do.
20/ I feel that framing it like this helped my students get past a lot of the dread, confusion and apathy that the word 'analysis' dredges up. It's not the whole picture — there is much more to reading, thinking and living — but it's a start.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ After chatting with @eugenemcfadden I've been thinking about embodiment. These things that are supposedly in our heads: #depression, #anxiety, #autism, #ADHD are for me PHYSICAL. Here are some thoughts on depression, and how it is different from sadness 🧵
@eugenemcfadden 2/ When you are sad, you are perhaps a little more of yourself. It makes you a little Cartesian; your mind, it seems, is noticing that you are feeling things, and knows it will have to wait this absurdity out, until you can go back to the numb comforts of normality.
@eugenemcfadden 3/ You observe a rawness within and without: eyelids and nostrils, follicles and skincells — these are the external, bodily realities that represent the internal shrinking and puckering.
1/ I've been thinking about my status as a neurodiverse educator: I'm #ADHD, and on the pathway for an #autism diagnosis. There's not a lot of discussion about what working life is like for neurodiverse educators, so I'm doing my own research and I plan to discuss it here. 🧵
2/ I'm going to start with a core tension the neurodiverse face: the DOUBLE EMPATHY PROBLEM.
3/ According to Milton (2012), cognitive neuroscience and other psychological paradigms don’t acknowledge the divergence and difference in social reality between autistic people and the ‘neurotypical’.
1/ With exams looming nearer, I thought I'd do some threads on aspects of the #Literature texts. cc. #TeamEnglish. Here are some thoughts about HANDS 🤝 early on in #RomeoAndJuliet 🧵
2/ Hands in the Prologue are synecdoche: they’re a stand-in for the dignified persons to whom they belong: Capulet, Montague and Escalus.
3/ With these names, we follow a similar logic: those are both the names of the houses and the men themselves, meaning that the staining of their hands with ‘civil blood’ 🩸 is the responsibility of their ‘houses’, not just them.
1/ Re: @TTRadioOfficial interview with @PhilBeadle@RogersHistory on #SLANT and the fallout, because I’ve seen lots about how it is impossible for SLANT to be anything other than positive, according to their experiences. But there's more to it than that, as I'll explore here 🧵
@TTRadioOfficial@PhilBeadle@RogersHistory 2/ Paradigms determine the ‘order of the visible and invisible’, but if we don’t interrogate them, things stay invisible. Privilege is one of those things. It determines the ‘order of the invisible’, but it is only *really* invisible to those whom it benefits.
@TTRadioOfficial@PhilBeadle@RogersHistory 3/ Peggy McIntosh, working in Women’s Studies, noticed that men were willing to acknowledge privilege in the abstract, but not in their daily lives and practices: “Those men who do grant that male privilege takes institutionalized and embedded forms are still likely to deny…