1/3 My experience of #Nido2023 (the coronavirus meeting in Montreux) so far 1) The organisers refused to let me share the materials I bought. That is, two articles, one on #Ebola2014 and our proposed origin of SARS-CoV-2
This is under the instruction of Swiss virologist Volker Thiel.
They have also been removing ones I have left around while I have been attending the talks. T
They also stopped me asking my question to ZLS.
See next tweet below:
At the conclusion of Shi Zhengli's talk the microphone person went over to hand me the microphone but the podium stopped them and sent them to another questioner.
Then I put my hand up again and a different microphone person came over to me....
The chair tried again to stop them and Flo Debarre (trying to whisper from 6 rows in front) says" dont give him the microphone" quite loudly. So they withdrew it and went over to flo instead who explained something or other to them...
By now the audience is wondering what's up! Several few people came up after and said it wasn't right to censor questioners. They don't even know the organisers have stopped me sharing articles.
Then began a favourite game, conference cat-and-mouse. So I set out more articles and left them for the audience to pick up. But I sat nearby so the organisers could see I was watching. After 20mins or so two organisers did take them all. I followed them, which they didnt expect.
I tracked them downstairs to the poster room, expecting they would throw them in the bin. They were for some reason coming my way. They saw me, turned and scurried into the poster room. They didnt know I was following them. Then they realised I was and the one holding....
the papers ran behind the posters while the other stopped. I said "I am glad your colleague likes science so much she took all the copies". Then I pointed out they were stealing and the copies cost 10 Francs each. They offered to give them back at the end of the conference...
This wont do though. A) its still censorship B) I will have to carry them home and they are heavy and it may not be practical. C) I expect they will be damaged.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/few. Attendees of #Nido2023 may be wondering why I am not being allowed to ask questions of the speakers. Attendees should know too that I was denied the right to share our printed scientific articles. No reason given so far except the "instructions of @ProfVolkerThiel" ...
3/few.
questions, thus exposing his research program as not a fair-minded and objective enquiry into #Covidorigins but a veiled defence of the zoonotic origin.
Here is a link to our discussion:
1/7:
Last week at the European Congress of Virology in Gdansk #ECV2023 I deep-sixed the raccoon dog market theory of #Covidorigins by questioning Martin Beer, senior author about their key paper (Freuling et al. 2020)
2/7 I asked why they tested a more transmissible G614 strain and not the original D614 strain, which would have supported or eliminated raccoon dogs as a potential intermediate host.
His answer was not "thanks, good idea we'll jump to it". He stumbled a bit and then, incredibly.
He said: I paraphrase slightly: "he didnt know whether D614 or G614 came first"
This is an astonishing answer on many levels.
Absolutely no one thinks that D614 came after G614. Because: 1) D614 was detected first 2) G614 displaced D614 as the pandemic progressed 3) See below...
2) The orthodox origin story has negligible evidence to support it. No #Ebola was found at Meliandou, Guinea, or elsewhere in wild animals nor was it diagnosed or positively tested in 'patient zero' or his contacts. The nearest known wild source was a whopping 3,000 km away
3) The subsequent epidemiological investigation back from the first confirmed cases was also highly speculative. E.g. the father and others disagree that his family had #Ebola, even tho' the epidemiology was supposedly largely based on interviews. #Ebola2014
Wanted to try a twitter tutorial (our first, so bear with it) on the v. interesting #CRISPR issues raised by the recent birth of #geneedited#Calf "Cosmo", thx to @UCDavis researcher @BioBeef. Author @MeganMolteni gamely brought in some perspective but no technical critic, so....
The following are issues neglected or barely raised in the text but should be born in mind while reading the article, which described attempts to add the SRY sex "determining" gene and make all male animals: wired.com/story/a-crispr…
2 The researchers began w/a "crude portrait" #genome sequence (so the first embryos died because the researchers chose the wrong place to edit). The premise of #geneediting is precision but this requires EXACT knowledge of the target genome, which almost invariably is lacking.