Bioscience Resource Project Profile picture
May 15 9 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/3 My experience of #Nido2023 (the coronavirus meeting in Montreux) so far
1) The organisers refused to let me share the materials I bought. That is, two articles, one on #Ebola2014 and our proposed origin of SARS-CoV-2

See: independentsciencenews.org/health/did-wes…
and
independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/a…
This is under the instruction of Swiss virologist Volker Thiel.
They have also been removing ones I have left around while I have been attending the talks. T

They also stopped me asking my question to ZLS.

See next tweet below:
At the conclusion of Shi Zhengli's talk the microphone person went over to hand me the microphone but the podium stopped them and sent them to another questioner.

Then I put my hand up again and a different microphone person came over to me....
The chair tried again to stop them and Flo Debarre (trying to whisper from 6 rows in front) says" dont give him the microphone" quite loudly. So they withdrew it and went over to flo instead who explained something or other to them...
By now the audience is wondering what's up! Several few people came up after and said it wasn't right to censor questioners. They don't even know the organisers have stopped me sharing articles.
Then began a favourite game, conference cat-and-mouse. So I set out more articles and left them for the audience to pick up. But I sat nearby so the organisers could see I was watching. After 20mins or so two organisers did take them all. I followed them, which they didnt expect.
I tracked them downstairs to the poster room, expecting they would throw them in the bin. They were for some reason coming my way. They saw me, turned and scurried into the poster room. They didnt know I was following them. Then they realised I was and the one holding....
the papers ran behind the posters while the other stopped. I said "I am glad your colleague likes science so much she took all the copies". Then I pointed out they were stealing and the copies cost 10 Francs each. They offered to give them back at the end of the conference...
This wont do though. A) its still censorship B) I will have to carry them home and they are heavy and it may not be practical. C) I expect they will be damaged.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bioscience Resource Project

Bioscience Resource Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BioSRP

May 16
1/few. Attendees of #Nido2023 may be wondering why I am not being allowed to ask questions of the speakers. Attendees should know too that I was denied the right to share our printed scientific articles. No reason given so far except the "instructions of @ProfVolkerThiel" ...
2/few.
So here are the dangerous papers you are not being allowed to see:
independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/a…
and
independentsciencenews.org/health/did-wes…
One reason may be that last week at #ECV2023 Prof Martin Beer, collaborator with @ProfVolkerThiel embarrassed himself with terrible answers to my...
3/few.
questions, thus exposing his research program as not a fair-minded and objective enquiry into #Covidorigins but a veiled defence of the zoonotic origin.
Here is a link to our discussion:
Read 9 tweets
May 14
1/7:
Last week at the European Congress of Virology in Gdansk #ECV2023 I deep-sixed the raccoon dog market theory of #Covidorigins by questioning Martin Beer, senior author about their key paper (Freuling et al. 2020)

It's over. And you are welcome! See below:
2/7 I asked why they tested a more transmissible G614 strain and not the original D614 strain, which would have supported or eliminated raccoon dogs as a potential intermediate host.

His answer was not "thanks, good idea we'll jump to it". He stumbled a bit and then, incredibly.
He said: I paraphrase slightly: "he didnt know whether D614 or G614 came first"
This is an astonishing answer on many levels.
Absolutely no one thinks that D614 came after G614. Because:
1) D614 was detected first
2) G614 displaced D614 as the pandemic progressed
3) See below...
Read 10 tweets
Oct 27, 2022
1/9 with @samhusseini we did a #deepdive investigation into the origin of the #Ebola2014 outbreak in W. Africa. The text is long. It follows up #Lableak Qs originally raised by @africanistpress and others. Below are distilled some of the key points.
independentsciencenews.org/health/did-wes…
2) The orthodox origin story has negligible evidence to support it. No #Ebola was found at Meliandou, Guinea, or elsewhere in wild animals nor was it diagnosed or positively tested in 'patient zero' or his contacts. The nearest known wild source was a whopping 3,000 km away
3) The subsequent epidemiological investigation back from the first confirmed cases was also highly speculative. E.g. the father and others disagree that his family had #Ebola, even tho' the epidemiology was supposedly largely based on interviews. #Ebola2014
Read 11 tweets
Oct 26, 2022
1/8 Super impt. findings of our investigation into the suppressed origin #Ebola2014 are the strong parallels between research on that outbreak and how #OriginofCOVID researchers manipulated #science to suppress #Covidorigin #lableak theories. See below
independentsciencenews.org/health/did-wes…
2) Just like the #OriginofCovid, the science of the outbreak was driven by conflicted researchers closely connected to the suspect lab #Ebola2014
3) Just like Covid, a barely credible origin narrative was presented as an established fact and propagated in the global media #Ebola2014
Read 8 tweets
Jul 26, 2020
Wanted to try a twitter tutorial (our first, so bear with it) on the v. interesting #CRISPR issues raised by the recent birth of #geneedited #Calf "Cosmo", thx to @UCDavis researcher @BioBeef. Author @MeganMolteni gamely brought in some perspective but no technical critic, so....
The following are issues neglected or barely raised in the text but should be born in mind while reading the article, which described attempts to add the SRY sex "determining" gene and make all male animals: wired.com/story/a-crispr…
2 The researchers began w/a "crude portrait" #genome sequence (so the first embryos died because the researchers chose the wrong place to edit). The premise of #geneediting is precision but this requires EXACT knowledge of the target genome, which almost invariably is lacking.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 16, 2020
Our new analysis proposes that #COVID19 (#SARSCoV2) leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology which was studying tissues from miners who died in 2012 in a novel #coronavirus outbreak. We call it the Mojiang Miners Passaging theory: #MMPtheory
independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/a…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(