Latest paper from Dr Robin Kerr & me: #LongCovid is primarily a Spike protein Induced Thrombotic Vasculitis researchsquare.com/article/rs-293…
Here we proposed that long covid is primarily a spike protein-induced thrombotic vasculitis, & we use Robin as a supporting case study 🧵 #TeamClots
We start by discussing the highly thrombotic nature of acute COVID & how this pathology doesnt cease in those with long COVID. in other words, long COVID is a continuation of the pathology accompanying acute COVID. Importantly, we cant rehabilitate until the pathology is treated
we highlight the role of microclots in capillary occlusion, that coagulopathic outcomes occur after acute covid (e.g. ↑ stroke risk), that there is platelet hyperactivation and endotheliitis, and all this leads to impaired oxygen extraction (and more)
to complicate things, we briefly discuss other core co-pathologies: #dysautonomia and #POTS, and #MCAS. We discuss that coagulopathy can be implicated in these diseases, for example, tryptase has a role in fibrinolysis
Since similar pathologies occur with the covid vaccines, we propose spike protein may have a unique role in aetiology of long COVID
Based on limited evidence, those with #LongCovid & #postvac seem to be unable to clear spike protein (/whole virion). We feel this offers clues
We therefore propose the use of the term "Spike protein-induced Thrombotic Vasculitis" or "SITV"
Naming things gets very heated, but this has some benefits: 1. It clearly describes the pathology 2. Provides focus for targeted treatment 3. Offers a distinction for subtypes of LC
This 3rd point is important. Whilst we do believe that long COVID is predominated by coagulopathy, we fully acknowledge this may not be the primary pathology for EVERYONE. lots of work is characterising subtypes, we feel characterising by primary pathology can be useful
We then discuss treatment targets:
Anticoagulants, particularly heparin due to its affinity to spike protein, and dabigatran due to its enhanced fibrinolytic properties
Antiplatelets, particularly P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g. clopidogrel) and aspirin
We also note aspirin has previously been investigated to reduce vaccine-induced (acute) endotheliitis
Antidepressants (SSRIs), particularly sertraline. SSRIs reduce endothelial inflammatory markers (e.g. IL-8), binds to S1 subunit of the spike protein, have antiplatelet effects,
...mast cell stabilising effects, and anti-neuroinflammatory effects. the antiplatelet and endothelial effects seem enhanced in combination with aspirin or clopidogrel
so to be clear, we are interested in SSRIs because of their role in coagulopathic mechanisms!
in line with others, we believe early and aggressive treatment is needed.
At the lack of RCTs, we present Robin's case.
After > 20 months of hell, he started aggressive triple therapy. he initially declined as many do, but then recovered
then he got his second infection. All hell broke loose again. a less aggressive treatment regime did not help him, but triple therapy + SSRIs (as a third antiplatelet) did. He returned to work and exercise.
...then got infection number 3 and recovered rapidly with aggressive antiplatelet treatment
Whilst we don't think coagulopathy is the ONLY thing going wrong in EVERYONE with long COVID, we think this is a primary problem in many patients, and should be treated aggressively and early if possible
This does not preclude fully exploring and treating other co-pathologies...
...but our perspective does give examples of how coagulopathy can interact with other co-pathologies, creating a vicious cycle between lots of factors.
there are many other things going on as well as other treatments worthy of exploration too, which we didn't discuss in detail
We hope this is an interesting and useful paper. We will be submitting to journals soon, so we welcome feedback (bearing in mind we have word limits and can't discuss it all!). (Robin's email is on the manuscript)
To be clear: theres lots of treatment targets. The ones we discuss are (mostly) the ones useful for Robins case as publishing that was the initial point of the paper, & then we decided to turn that into a perspective piece. Patients should be treated for their indiv needs ofc!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Last year we found:
👉🏻severe B12 deficiency
✅low MMA after B12 replacement...
❌...but still elevated homocysteine
❔low-normal folate
❌no MTHFR gene variant
✅...but correction of homocysteine after folic acid supplementation
They're trying to understand if there's immunological factors that prevent some people getting infected (among other things). 🧵
As a "never infected" participant, I got to partake. though my infection status is due to FFP3 & living a fairly isolated disabled life rather than my immune system being super awesome
Example: my haematological treatment is based on standard pulmonary emboli guidelines. These do not take into account the complexity of my case, so how can my treatment be evidence based?
The doctor is essentially winging it as much as doctors treating #postvac#LongCovid outwith guidelines...because there are no evidence based guidelines right now
"You expect me to believe blood sugar is the reason we needed to amputate your leg?"
"Riiiiggghhht, so the lump in your lung has just *moved* to your liver..."
"And how exactly do you think shellfish made your throat swell up?!"
"Youre saying the virus has been hiding in your body and has now come back to life and given you shingles?"
"Really, you think your own immune system is 'attacking' you"
"There's no evidence a head injury can make you thirsty"
Physiology is complex.
It utterly baffles me that so many doctors seem to think we know and understand it all, that what they learnt at med school is fact and final, that things they cant imagine happening *might actually be happening*.
Ofc if we got rid of the source there'd be no problem, right?
Well yeah but i dont think thats realistic since any1 can say anything & even make a false but evidence based conclusion (see pinned tweet). We dont all believe everything we hear, theres reasons we believe what we do
Finland puts a lot of effort into this and it seems more successful than binary "blame the disinfo spreaders" narratives many of us have