#BREAKING - A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the #DelhiHighCourt challenging the RBI's decision to withdraw Rs 2000 banknotes from circulation. The #PIL argues that #RBI has no independent power under Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
Denomination of Rs.2000 printed in 2016 and later on is in very good condition with strong safety measures and need not required to be withdrawn from the circulation under Clean Note Policy or otherwise, the PIL argues.
Thousand Crores have been spent from the public exchequer as a printing cost for printing good quality with better safety denomination ... which will be wasted, if such banknotes are withdrawn from the circulation measures unnecessary without any valid scientific reasons: PIL
Practically everyone has stopped taking Rs.2000 banknote from each other in the society/market after the RBI notification under challenge which creates hardship for the citizen of the country specially for women/ living in remote/village area: PIL
The present decision of withdrawal of only Rs.2000 banknote only after 4-5 years of circulation within specific deadline i.e. 30 Sept. 2023 is unjust, arbitrary and against the public policy and it is not the similar action done by the RBI in the year 2014: PIL
"RBI has no independent power under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 to direct the non-issue or the discontinuance of issue of bank notes of any denominational values and the said power is vested only with the Central Government ... ," the PIL argues.
PIL In Delhi High Court Challenges RBI's Decision To Withdraw All Rs 2,000 Currency Notes From Circulation
Bombay High Court hearing Sameer Wankhede's co-accused Sam D'Souza's plea seeking quashing of CBI case alleging over Rs 25 crore corruption in the 2021 Cordelia Cruise Ship Drug Bust.
Earlier the court extended interim relief to Sameer Wankhede against any coercive action till June 8, 2023 subject to his not giving any press statement or publishing any material on the matter #SamDSouza #SameerWankhede#BombayHighCourt #CBI #AryanKhan
ACMM Vaibhav Mehta of Rouse Avenue Courts partly allowed #RahulGandhi’s application seeking no objection for issuance of fresh ordinary passport to him for 10 years, after he surrendered his diplomatic passport on being disqualified as a Member of Parliament.
The application was moved by Gandhi in the National Herald case filed by former MP Subramanian Swamy against him. He and his mother Sonia Gandhi were granted bail in the case in December 2015. However, the court had not put any condition regarding travel on him.
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi appearing for RBI said that the RBI’s recent decision is not demonetisation and is only an exercise of currency management. He suggested that the matter be heard on a later date as judgment has already been reserved in similar PIL.
On the other hand, it is the petitioner’s case that RBI has no independent power under RBI Act to take such decision. The PIL has been filed by advocate Rajneesh Bhaskar Gupta.
Delhi High Court dismisses pleas moved by Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Wadra, Aam Aadmi Party and other charitable trusts challenging the IT authorities' decision to transfer their tax assessments to the central circle.
YS Vivekananda Reddy murder case| #SupremeCourt vacation bench to hear petition filed by Suneetha Reddy, daughter of YS Vivekananda Reddy, challenging HC order granting conditional bail to accused T Gangi Reddy.
Sr Adv Siddharth Luthra: CBI's affidavit states that HC order sets a bad precedent, comments on state investigation. SC while sending it back to HC said that it seems that state was dragging its feet and protecting this gentleman. That's the reason for default bail.
Justice Maheshwari: There is another case in which notice is to be issued.
#SupremeCourt vacation bench to hear TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee's plea challenging Calcutta HC order which had refused to direct CBI-ED to not interrogate him in West Bengal School Job Scam case and had imposed ₹25 Lakh fine on him.