The NDP had to do something very difficult in this election. It had to convince a lot of Albertans to vote NDP for the first time in their lives. They had to get them to go against their identities and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Coming into this election, Danielle Smith was very much the focus of people’s attention. Her favourables were lower than Rachel Notley’s. Many past UCP voters were repelled by her, thought she was worse than Jason Kenney as Premier, and felt she was a risky prospect. It looked… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In the end, the structural advantages of a united conservative electorate t in Alberta meant the UCP was always the favourites to win the election. The NDP needed to center the election around healthcare, convince voters they had economic credibility, and persuade individuals… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Ultimately, it appears the NDP was unable to convince enough Albertans that the UCP and Smith were too risky and that Notley and the NDP were a safe alternative. To defeat an incumbent, especially in a province like Alberta, requires both those conditions to be met.
Danielle Smith will likely continue as Premier after tomorrow’s election. How long she can stay in the role remains to be seen. But her campaign closed stronger than it started with a solid debate performance and a closing week without much controversy.
Does this mean Alberta is now solidly a two-party system? I think so. Will it always be naturally competitive? Maybe not. Depends on many variables.
But whether or not the result tomorrow night is as I expect (and we still could be surprised), there will be a lot of lessons for political managers to unpack in the days and weeks ahead.
Alberta will come out of this election quite divided along regional, demographic, and cultural lines. This election exposed some big cleavages with old, traditional Alberta one on side and a newer, contemporary Alberta on the other. Younger and newer Albertans are strongly… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Tomorrow we are likely to see Danielle Smith and the UCP re-elected but the results of the survey suggest we could be surprised. Some will think I’m hedging my bets but any conclusion otherwise would be foolish given how close things are and the variables that could tilt things… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🌞 Good Sunday morning, Canada! It's a beautiful day and I've got some data-driven reasons for you to feel optimistic about our great country! 🇨🇦
First up, let's talk about our incredible forests! Did you know that Canada is home to 9% of the world's forests? 🌳 That's 347 million hectares of carbon-capturing, oxygen-generating green goodness!
🌬️ Speaking of the environment, let's look at renewable energy. Canada is a world leader in hydroelectric power, generating 60% of our electricity from this clean source.💡 Our windy coasts are also fueling a boom in wind energy, which now accounts for 5% of our power.⚡️
Just finished an @abacusdataca survey of 1,000 Albertans (Dec 6 to 10) as part of a national survey.
Will have a deep dive into the AB political environment out in the next few days, but the data I'm seeing lays out the path for both the UCP and NDP pretty clearly. #ableg
As I see it, there are 4 key segments of voters to watch carefully.
✔️Loyal UCP - Voted UCP in '19, and would today.
✔️Loyal NDP - Voted NDP in '19 & would today.
✔️Reluctant UCP - Voted UCP '19 and aren't or are undecided now.
✔️Smaller parties - Voted AP, Lib, etc in 2019.
The most interesting to me is the 𝓡𝓮𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽 𝓤𝓒𝓟 group.
All voted UCP in '19 and now they say they aren't or are undecided.
When you look at how this group compares with the Loyal UCP and Loyal NDP groups, you see what each party has to do to win next year.
I've been thinking a lot about the occupation/protests in Ottawa and have been inspired by work being done by colleagues and others to understand the dynamics of public opinion and the impact on political behaviour.
And I think our political future will depend upon having a really good understanding of the opinion landscape.
This is especially true for those who lead orgs in business, media, and government. As I'll show you, you don't see the world in the same way as everyone else.
In preparing for a briefing for a client on tax fairness, affordability, and public policy in Canada, I went back to a survey we did for @PIPSC_IPFPC and @broadbent in July 2021.
A lot of the same concerns I see today in polling existed then...
Soon after the discovery of the remains of 215 children at the Kamloops residential school site, we conducted a national survey of 3,000 Canadians with @CRRF and @AFN_Updates.
The results indicate that this event might be a tipping point.
Not only did almost all Canadians hear about it, but it had most people thinking about residential schools and how Indigenous people have been treated in Canada.
How did Canadians react to the discovery? 24% weren't surprised, but for the rest of the country, it was worse than they thought. 1 in 3 said they were "shocked" by the news.