Ben Profile picture
Jun 12, 2023 23 tweets 13 min read Read on X
🔥 A deep dive into how Pfizer and their original mRNA manufacturer BioNTech prepared early for the pandemic that appeared to unfold into 2020...
#COVID19 #Covid #mrna @RobertKennedyJr @Johnincarlisle @delbigtree @AlexBerenson @benshapiro @elonmusk @KimIversenShow
1/n 🧵 Image
9/4/2019
Bill #Gates invests 50 million euros in Biontech, a manufacturer of genetically engineered therapies for cancer patients.
investors.biontech.de/news-releases/… Image
10/10/2019
BioNTech goes public/IPO.

reuters.com/article/us-bio… Image
10/18/2019
The #Gates Foundation's Event 201 pandemic simulation game simulates a coronavirus outbreak in Brazil and recommends, among other things, consistent media control, algorithm manipulation and fact checking.
youtube.com/playlist?list=…
11/2019 (undated)
The National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) reports exceptional cases of illness in #Wuhan. The Pentagon denies it.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/intel…
11/14/2019
#Biontech would like to work on mRNA vaccines. #Sahin hopes for the first approval in 5-6 years.
12/19 (undated)
The first clips - later to be found to be staged - from #Wuhan are appearing on social media.
12/31/2019
The first official reports on COVID. Peoples Daily China reports a novel lung disease in #Wuhan.
wap.peopleapp.com/article/498300…
1/10/2020
Professor Edward Holmes posts a message by Prof. Yong-Zhen Zhang about the alleged novel viral genome.
To this date, the exact 'genome contigs' remain unreproducible and no assembler has ever found the entire genome from start to end.
usmortality.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-g… Image
1/21/2020
The #WEF meeting 2020 in Davos begins.
www-tagesspiegel-de.translate.goog/wirtschaft/119… Image
1/22/2020
President #Trump comments on the coronavirus for the first time in Davos.
cnbc.com/2020/01/22/tru…
1/22/2020
The Johns Hopkins University starts its Covid Dashboard, just as practiced in even 201. Image
1/23/2020

Prof. Dr. Drosten publishes the first PCR test protocol for the 'novel coronavirus' without having access to a real virus sample.
The publication was peer-reviewed in less than 24h, which is unheard of.
eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280… Image
1/21/2020
The first US case, a man who went to an urgent care clinic "after seeing reports about the outbreak."
history.com/this-day-in-hi… Image
3/11/2020 WHO officially declares a pandemic.
who.int/director-gener…
Lockdowns begin.
As economies come to a stop, and most people stay at home, mortality rises in certain places.
NYC experiences a rise of 5x normal mortality, while other cities see significantly less deaths. Image
Dr. Rancourt concludes, that the initial peaks seen synchronously around the world are "from an epidemiological standpoint strictly impossible, because the time from seeding of the infection to the measurable rise in mortality is completely uncertain."
3/25/2020
#Gates : "Ultimately, we need certificates."
During the covid pandemic, flu completely disappears.
To this date, the exact mechanism remains unclear. Image
7/30/2021
Dr. Fauci, stating on national TV, that vaccinated people are “capable of transmitting the infection” and stating that the level of virus are “essentially equivalent” between vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.
8/6/2021
In a COVID-19 "outbreak" in Barnstable County, MA - CDC confirms that "Cycle threshold values were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated and those who were not." therefore not offering any protection against spread.
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
6/2023
Yet, 3 year later:
"The WHO will take up the EU system of digital COVID-19 certification to establish a global system that will help protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats, including pandemics."
commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-p…
H/T, for many of the tweets in German: @provoziert
@EWoodhouse7

Find my latest work on all-cause mortality at: mortality.watch

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben

Ben Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @USMortality

Aug 20
💥💥💥 An official CDC FOIA response confirms that the validation of the SARS-CoV-2 genome has not been completed to scientific standards! 💥💥💥

CDC Unable to Scientifically Verify Full SARS-CoV-2 Genome, Leaving Potential for Semi-Random Construct.

🧵 A thread...Image
The response:

CDC has responded to my FOIA request, in which I have asked for records related to these four points:

1. Records on single virion sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 that ensured the virion was physically isolated from any other genetic material before sequencing.
2. Records of a single sequencing (long-)read from the first position [..] to the last position [..] of the genome. [..]
Read 17 tweets
Jun 5
This may as well be part of the script/disinformation campaign after all:

>> This is important to understand <<

Hypothetical Disinformation Campaign Scenario

1. Initial Denial:
• Key Players: Military, secret agencies, health authorities, virologists, philanthropists, etc.
• Action: Strongly deny any allegations of a secret operation involving a lab-manufactured virus leak (commonly referred to as the “Lab Leak Theory”).
• Narrative: Label the lab leak theory as a baseless conspiracy, dismissing it without thorough investigation.

2. Diversion:
• Media Strategy: Shift the focus of the media to alternative explanations, such as the “Zoonosis Theory” (natural transmission from animals to humans).
• Examples: Highlight potential sources such as bats and pangolins to distract and redirect public attention.
• Impact: This redirection aims to convince the majority of the population (~70%) to believe in a "viral spillover", thus novelty of the virus.

3. False Confirmation:
• Controlled Leaks: Release unverifiable “evidence” that appears to confirm the lab leak theory through credible sources.
• Staged Reports: Media outlets present findings like the Furin Cleavage Site or HIV inserts as proof of the lab-manufactured origin.
• Public Reaction: Skeptics (~25%) quickly adopt this narrative, now able to direct their frustration towards those seemingly responsible.

4. Framing:
• Agenda Alignment: Shape the lab leak confirmation to justify specific actions or policies that stakeholders wish to implement.
• Justifications: Use this narrative to defend the necessity of questionable virological surveillance, mass testing, lockdowns, masking, and mass vaccinations as preventive measures.

5. Public Manipulation:
• Perceived Investigation: Convince the public that the origin of the virus has been thoroughly investigated and validated, creating a false sense of certainty.
• Acceptance: The public now either believes in the perpetual risk of natural spillover or lab leak pandemics, leading to widespread acceptance of continuous countermeasures.
• Focus Shift: Rather than calling for the cessation of Gain-of-Function (GoF) research, the narrative shifts to the inevitability of such research due to its international nature, emphasizing the need for ongoing measures like viral surveillance, mass testing and vaccinations.

Summary: Stakeholders deny the “Lab Leak Theory,” redirect media to natural origins, then release false evidence supporting the lab leak to win over skeptics. This frames their original techniques and countermeasures as necessary, manipulating the public into accepting any future measures.Image
Instead, people like Dr. Binder have pointed out since 2020, that the use of mass PCR testing, is entirely responsible for this phenomenon:
In addition, Dr. Rancourt has shown strong epidemiological evidence, that the mass casualties that were observed in some regions cannot be caused by a novel risk-additive pathogen:
Read 4 tweets
Apr 25
There are several problems with the reference genome (b) published by Wu et al. 2020 (a):

1. The sequenced patient sample contained genetic material from different sources: human, bacterial, viral, etc. Although known sequences were filtered out after sequencing, there is no guarantee that all non-novel-viral sequences were actually removed.

2. The patient's human genome was not sequenced for control.

3. Reassembly of the dataset published by Wu using Megahit does not provide the exact or complete sequence as published.

4. Trinity, the second program used for de novo sequencing, is unable to generate the identical contig.

5. When using untrimmed or protocol-trimmed reads (Takara), no reads are found that perfectly match both ends of the genome. This is unusual because, according to a theoretical simulation, several ends should be found in the sample. (c)

6. It has not yet been proven that the entire sequence (~30 KB) actually occurs in this form in the samples, e.g. by agarose gel electrophoresis or (Sanger/whole genome) sequencing.

7. Wu et al. published three versions of the reference genome, the first of which contained known sequences from the human reference genome. The fact that the first version contained human sequences suggests possible problems with sequencing or analysis.

8. The amplicons, i.e. the sequences of the ends found using RACE, have not been published. The non-publication of the amplicon sequences raises questions about the transparency and reproducibility of the study.

9. The only non-Chinese author of this paper, Eddie Holmes, confirmed to me by email that he had no detailed knowledge of these issues. There was silence from the Chinese side, although questions were asked via Holmes. (d)

These clear scientific problems therefore clearly call into question the validity of the SARS-CoV-2 sequence.

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/virus/vss…
usmortality.substack.com/p/why-the-ends…
usmortality.substack.com/p/why-do-wu-et…
10. Wu et al., only published a single run, which is supposed to prove the sequence.
11. Wu claims they found a complete sequence before they actually knew its true length - they were just missing the ends, which they then added manually via RACE.
That's a fallacy - because how can one determine the length of a new sequence without first finding the ends, and thus the true length?
Read 7 tweets
Mar 17
There's a large pharma funded Measles Scare Campaign ongoing.
The actual data doesn't support this.Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 7
‼️ Phantom Vaccine Efficacy!

A list of statistical tricks, that can be used to calculate an illusion of vaccine efficacy with a placebo alone.

For this exercise, I have used a sine wave to simulate weekly deaths:Image
... and a logistic growth function to simulate placebo vaccination from 0 to 75% of the population.
By the green/red dots, we can see no difference/effect, as no statistical tricks are applied yet. Image
Trick 1: Unknown Vaccination Status --> Unvaccinated.

If 50% of Unknown vaccination status is treated as unvaccinated, almost 3x higher mortality rates appear for unvaccinated. This is entirely an illusion. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(