#SupremeCourt to hear today ED’s plea challenging the Madras HC order which allowed the shifting of Tamil Nadu minister Senthil Balaji to private hospital. #TamilNadu#EnforcementDirectorate
SG Mehta: I was going to say that this kind of order sets a wrong precedent. But a common man doesn't get the benefits of habeas when arrested...
SG Mehta: Other side's argument would be that it's an interim order, go argue. That I'll address it first. The Supreme Court has held in its judgement that where notice is made returnable and not the date of filing.
SG Mehta: This was read before the High Court but they still passed their order...It is not an interim order, the court has entertained the petition...
Justice Surya Kant: These two questions High Court has formulated. HC has used a very guarded language, HC is aware of the fact. first, the HC will determine whether it is factually correct.
Justice Surya Kant: The HC is yet to opine whether merely because the facts are correct, would he get a habeas. HC has by asking this second question has obliged itself.
Justice Surya Kant: Will it not amount to passing a preventive order? Should an opportunity not be given to HC to render its view point? You're right that there are cases where HC held erroneous orders...today you're having some apprehensions in mind.
SG Mehta: My apprehension is because that you're supposed to look at when you issue notice and make it returnable.
Justice Surya Kant: We have no doubt in HC's ability to adjudge...HC has merely issued a notice in the Habeas Corpus petition...HC also feels that even if the facts are correct, it may not be enough to maintain a habeas Corpus petition.
Justice Surya Kant: Noone can take away your right of remand. You're entitled to it. The only question is should it be deferred or postponed till the day that the person's ailment, surgery is recovered.
Justice Surya Kant: We are confident that the HC is fully aware of the law...in any case if an inferior court fails to appreciate law, we are sitting here.
Kaul: You're saying I fabricated four blockages in my heart!
SG Mehta: I'm not on that. That may be or may not be. I'm saying that the 15 days will pass...
Justice Surya Kant: don't worry about that, we are here.
SG Mehta: That assures me.
Justice Surya Kant: We will just pass a two line order today and then see...none of you should have any apprehension. Both sides should argue before HC...
Justice Surya Kant: Since the HC is yet to render its final opinion regarding the maintainability of habeas Corpus petition and the exclusion of the period of treatment undergone by the detenue from the period of custodial interrogation...
Justice Surya Kant: ...and since both these issues are likely to be examined by the HC on 22 June or after, we deem it appropriate to list this SLP for hearing on so and so date. We request the HC to proceed with the matter on merits.
In an order dated 15th June 2023, a Division Bench comprising of Chief Justice Sivagnaman and Justice Uday Kumar of the Calcutta HC had directed the State election commission to requisition central reserve forces for the #PanchayatElections within 48 hours.
While the State and SEC had preferred appeals before the #SupremeCourt, regarding the deployment of central forces, the Supreme Court affirmed the order of the Calcutta High Court and dismissed their appeal on the 20th of June 2023.
#CalcuttaHighCourt takes up a PIL complaining of alleged illegality committed by the Governor of WB acting as Chancellor of certain State Universities in appointing interim VCs without any consultation with the relevant State Ministries.
Previously, a Division Bench of the Calcutta HC had directed the State to follow the UGC Regulations of 2018 in the appointment of VCs for State Universities.
The petitioners have contended that while the Division Bench decision in Anupam Bera v State of WB, cited above, held the appointment of 24 Vice Chancellors to be unsustainable, it also emphasised on the fact that:
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea challenging Calcutta High Court's order directing the West Bengal State Election Commission to requisition central forces for all districts in West Bengal for the 2023 Panchayat Elections #WestBengalPanchayatElections2023
A vacation Bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Manoj Misra to hear the matter.
Sr Adv for State of WB: One paragraph becomes relevant. The only issue is with respect to deployment of central forces.
The Kerala High Court will soon hear a plea alleging illegal encroachment of Sree Sarkara Devi Temple in Thiruvananthapuram by alleged members of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for conducting mass drills and weaponry training. #KeralaHighCourt
The plea was filed by two devotees and nearby residents of the temple stating that the action of the alleged RSS members is causing agony to the devotees and pilgrims visiting the temple, particularly, women and children. #KeralaHighCourt
The petitioners have sought for a direction to the temple authorities to ensure that the temple and its premises are only used for devotional purposes and to protect the Right To Worship of the petitioners. #KeralaHighCourt
The Kerala High Court is set to hear the plea moved by MLA V.D Satheeshan and MLA Ramesh Chennithala, seeking a Court monitored enquiry into the Safe Kerala Project that installed AI cameras across the State for capturing traffic violations
The present plea has been filed challenging the orders issued by the Government, action taken by the delegate KELTRON, and the alleged illegalities and corruption attached to the installation of AI Cameras that have resulted in nepotism, favouritism and corruption.
#MadrasHC is hearing a petition filed by a Madurai lawyer who was arrested by the NIA for being part of the banned organisation #PFI
The petitioner sought to stay the investigation as he was booked and arrested for expressing some comments on social media against NIA and appearing in favor of the Popular Front of India executives. The case is being heard by Justice M Sundar and Justice R Sakthivel #MadrasHC… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The Madurai bar also appears before the court and says that the lawyers are being intimidated by the NIA. They also inform that the lawyer has been in continuous practice for 16 years and has even contested in the bar council elections #MadrasHC #NIA