Thread by @AVSmartz

I find it telling that people who make "these" claims are perfectly willing to stand corrected - IN A PUBLIC DEBATE.

Offering to have your evidence-based beliefs corrected in public is about as genuinely humble and vulnerable as one could be.

#PublicDebate is healthy!

https://twitter.com/TTAVOfficial/status/1671562602340548608

Equally telling is when offering to debate, the response is to make false accusations, play the victim and personally attack others using derogatory labels like AntiVaxxer or Conspiracy Theorist w/o a shred of evidcence to support their claims. This exposes their lies in my view.

The reason none of them CAN debate is because theories on conspiracies have proven true, like the lab leak being confirmed yesterday. Like the lies about #HCQ and #IVM being exposed by DARPA. Like the vaccines working poorly evidenced by 5+ boosters

and DARPA saying they not only work poorly but were developed using GofF which could too easily lead to a lab leak JUST as it did. Add to this blatant #MalfeasanceOfDuty - and Anti-Trust Violations, both felonies and you'll understand why they have to continue to accuse and

lie repeatedly. Because if they sit for a debate that would have a massive audience, after 3 years of refusal, it would be the kind of criminal exposure to put put an end to unsafe products being forced on people who know their rights and are free to choose

a different health protocol, privately, in confidence, with their own doctor. No one is #AntiVaxx they are #ProSafety. People will reasonably consider taking any product that a manufacturer is willing to stand behind. But anyone who thinks people should be bribed, coerced or

otherwise intimidated under threat of public shaming and/or losing rights, is an accomplice to medical genocide. When it is proven that the vaccines have in fact caused harm or death beyond our current acceptable limits there will be a price to pay. Keep refusing to debate

because that too will be evidence of your guilt.

@threadreaderapp unroll