,
9 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
The problem is not necessarily the Electoral College; the problem is that in the early 19th C the EC changed from a deliberative system to a winner-take-all
system. Both add a mechanism between the popular vote and the president, but one is a brake, the other an accelerator. /1
system. Both add a mechanism between the popular vote and the president, but one is a brake, the other an accelerator. /1
To understand how we got here, you have to remember that the Framers did not foresee the rise of political parties. Or rather, they hoped it would never happen. so they created a system divided horizontally, if you will, rather than vertically. "Best men" choose leaders. /2 
Also, the EC was never an attempt to protect small states (who wanted 1 vote/state); it was a way to give slave states power over the presidency. EC gives vote for each Senator and Representative, so advantage to big states, like Virginia (in those days). /3
Idea is that well-known men in each state (more in bigger states) will cast 2 votes for president and VP, and best men will rise to top. If no decision, will send to House, where each state has one vote. This should give people a voice, without enabling demagogues. /4
First contested election is 1796, after George Washington, who won the Electoral College easily, steps down. By then, political parties have formed (which is one of the reasons he quits, warning Americans they're going in a bad direction). /5
In 1796, VA's Thomas Jefferson loses the EC to MA's John Adams... but he would've won if all electors in his strongholds had voted for him. So, to give his party a leg up in next round, VA tells its electors to vote for whoever wins the VA popular vote. Jefferson wins in 1800. /6
Other states quickly follow suit, with winning parties demanding all their state's electoral votes. Framer James Madison was appalled, because winner-take-all would increase factionalism and the power of party leaders. He WANTED A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO STOP THE POLICY. /7
It didn't happen, b/c whenever a party is in power, it likes the winner-take-all system. But in the hyper partisanship of today, with the popular will thwarted by voter suppression, gerrymandering, etc., the system utterly failed to stop a demagogue. /8
The original Electoral College died in the early nineteenth century. It was replaced by a system that has crippled democracy. It is not radical to reexamine it; such a reexamination is just what the Framers would've wanted. /END
