If you are #depressed, you are living in the past
If you are #anxious, you are living in the future
If you are at peace, you are living in the present
- Lao Tzu
This is intended to be educational re: depression & anxiety. It mentions concepts that can be difficult to read about suicide, trauma, and depression. If you're not in a place to read it now, come back later :)
It is attributed to Lao Tzu (Laozi) the (likely) mythical author of the Tao Te Ching, foundation of Taoist philosophy and religion.
It's been attributed to many (inc. Warren Buffet). Many believe it's from a Brazilian motivational speaker./3
Laozi (if real at all), almost certainly did not mention depression or anxiety, modern concepts. He mentions fear and shame, but only occasionally. Generally, Taoist principles aren't mindfulness principles, which came later. Past accomplishment matters in Taoism.
/4
Second, the attribution of this pseudo-profound BS to Laozi is very likely intentional.
Often, "eastern wisdom" is brought to the west as "magical" and "mystical truths," a common stereotype that is NOT HELPFUL. Even modern applications of mindfulness fall prey to this.
/5
So far, with this quote, we've established:
* the dude is maybe not real
* quote doesn't exist
* its contrary to Taoist principles
* whoever first faked it is trying to evoke a pseudo-profound "Eastern Mystical" stereotype
THE CONTENT IS TOTALLY WRONG. There is no profound statement WHATSOEVER in this wrongly-attributed, fake, stereotypical quote.
/7
Let's break it down.
"If you are #depressed, you are living in the past."
This is a stigmatizing, simplifying, hurtful stereotype of a view of depression that leads to all sorts of hurtful "advice", assumptions about weakness, and other problems.
DEPRESSION IS COMPLEX.
/8
Depression affects how one perceives THE PAST:
* guilt about events and actions of the past
* regret about past relationships
* grieving a previous loss
* self-hatred regarding a past trauma
* negative misinterpretations of past events
/9
Depression affects how one perceives THE PRESENT:
* worthlessness and guilt about self
* burden placed on friends/family
* boredom
* active/current suicidal thinking
* malaise; fatigue; appetite change; lethargy
* negative misinterpretations about present moments
/10
Depression affects how one perceives THE FUTURE:
* hopelessness about the future
* shortening of future
* overprediction/unacceptability of failure
* contingency / expected suicidal planning and thinking
* negative misinterpretations about future events
/11
Unsurprisingly, a depressive episode can distort and affect all areas of cognition.
NOTHING is true about "#Depression is living in the past."
It is a common myth; a stigmatizing thought that leads to unhelpful suggestions, and a gross oversimplification.
/12
What about "If you are #anxious, you are living in the future"?
This is called "retrospective" or "review/edit" anxiety:
"What did they think of me?"
"What if it's the last time I saw them?"
"What did I say?"
"What if I said <x> instead?"
"Did I make a mistake?"
"Do they like me?" etc.
/14
Anxiety can also affect the PRESENT moment.
It's called "experiential" anxiety.
Eg:
"what are they thinking right now?"
"is this person mad at me?"
OR
- hypervigilence in PTSD/trauma
- obsessions in OCD
- panic attacks and symptoms
- helpful anxiety: car horn
/15
And of course, anxiety famously includes many apprehensions about THE FUTURE.
These are called "prospective" or "anticipatory" anxieties.
- foreshortened future in PTSD
"What if I fail?"
"There's no way I'll get it."
"I'll get sick."
..etc.
/16
So once again, this fake quote by a mythical person contrary to the ideologies of the book in evocation of an eastern stereotype IS WRONG.
Anxiety can distort many things about how one perceives the past, future, and present.
/17
Finally, lets tackle the idiocy of:
"If you are at peace, you are living in the present."
This entitled, selfish, privileged, narrow bullshit statement is completely unrelated to reality.
I value mindful practice. I value quiet moments. But I am damned lucky to have them.
/18
Can you think of anyone living in the present who isn't at peace?
I'll give you a subtle hint:
VICTIMS AND SUFFERERS OF WAR, TRAUMA, ABUSE, HOMOPHOBIA, TRANSPHOBIA, VIOLENCE, POVERTY, RACISM, SEXISM....
If not you: Be peaceful PRESENTLY when a bear runs into the room.
/19
Of course, when you ARE SAFE and FREE/AWAY FROM OPPRESSION AND VIOLENCE, it can be very helpful to practice mindfulness, or other forms of relaxation (mindfulness is a good package for relaxation, but it's not magic).
/20
In moments of distress, it can be helpful to think of a goal in the future, or a happy moment/memory of the past.
When in an argument with a loved one, your history with them helps you still love them.
I wanted to be a doctor, so I sometimes sacrificed present for future.
/21
So why did I call it pseudo-profound? Because, like many, when I first read it I was like, "huh. cool." But when you think about it, the profundity goes away. It is not a helpful statement, a true statement, hell, it doesn't even have the proper author.
/22
And, worse, it's "helpful hints" like this that completely marginalize, mock, degrade, and devalue the true experience of depression and anxiety, and make it seem like some three line prop-quote can cure these problems.
/23
So the next time you're at a conference (HEY LEADERS, I know you like quotes!!!), and you see some quote like this, take a moment to REALLY digest it. More times than not, it's Deepak Chopra Generator - level BS.
If you are someone reading this and you know someone with anxiety or depression; instead of offering superficial advice, try listening and asking "is there anything I can do to be helpful?" This question is probably 1,500 times more useful than "you should..." advice
/25
If you are a physician, please try and remember that depression is a HETEROGENEOUS set of pathways and causes leading to a variable but common phenomenology. It's not simple... it's complex.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Point 1: "Disease-targeting" is an invented criterion
1a. You demand drugs show "disease-targeting effects" or be presumed harmful. This is never necessary. The actual claim: reliable symptom change across replicated RCTs.
/2
Point 1: "Disease-targeting" is an invented criterion
1b. Cardiology doesn't know the molecular lesion driving most post-MI mortality benefit from beta-blockers. We use them anyway because they work. "No known mechanism, therefore presume harm" would gut most of medicine.
/3
The core trick: he treats prescription prevalence as self-evidently bad. But high rates only signal a problem if the meds don't work, are given to people who don't need them, or cause net harm. He establishes none of this. He just gestures at numbers.
/2
The same rhetorical structure would indict insulin prescribing, or asthma inhalers. Prevalence is not pathology. The question is whether treatment matches need — and whether the alternative (untreated illness) is better or worse.
/3
It makes no sense the way we treat our people with disabilities in Canada. Canada has the full apparatus to implement adjusted payments, yet we typically support disabled people WELL under the poverty line.
/1
Canada has an official poverty line: the Market Basket Measure. It's regionally calibrated, methodologically sound, and updated by StatCan.
A single person on BC PWD receives ~$18.4k/year. The Vancouver MBM is ~$29k.
That's not a rounding error. It's a structural choice.
PWD recipients in Vancouver sit at roughly 47% of the poverty line and below the Deep Income Poverty threshold (75% of MBM), which is the level StatCan uses to flag the worst material deprivation in the country.
/3
To be clear, my first answer is "well we know they are supposed to block serotonin reuptake, but it's not that simple and we don't really know."
But, if you want the best 2026 science...
/1
For a few particularly science-interested patients, I walk them through what we currently have for the 'best evidence' even though we're still not sure.
This is the "best story" I can tell about SSRI's right now.
(nb, this is NOT locked in, this is MY best synthesis)
/2
1) SSRIs BLOCK the Serotonin Transporter
The protein that pulls serotonin back into the neuron after its released is blocked. Serotonin lingers longer in the synapse, the gap where neurons signal each other.
This is very well established, & how SSRIs were designed.
The Ihben story is making the rounds. "Judge forced 18 vaccines, child got autism." It's being treated as a smoking gun. It is not a smoking gun. It is barely a story.
Sourcing: one father, one advocacy org (CHD), one GiveSendGo. Records sealed. No filings. No named physicians. Every outlet repeating it cites the same Defender article. This is a closed loop, not corroboration.
/2
"18 vaccines in one day" is not a thing. That number counts antigens as doses to make the headline scream. Real catch-up schedules don't work this way and you can verify that in five minutes on the CDC site.
/3
Ask any person who has been even suggested to have BPD; they will uniformly tell you that they have been told to try DBT (Dialectical Behavioural Therapy). Reflexively recommended. "Gold standard."
This is not science-supported.
/1
Quick history: Marsha Linehan developed DBT in the late 1980s, published the foundational manual in 1993. She drew on CBT, Zen Buddhism, and dialectical philosophy. Brilliant clinician, brilliant marketer. Her institute has trained tens of thousands of therapists worldwide.
/2
That marketing machine is the reason DBT is "the BPD treatment." It is not the reason DBT works better than alternatives, because it does not.
The faint superiority signals in older trials evaporate once you adjust for allegiance bias (DBT researchers studying DBT).
/3