1/12
In June 2015, a constitutionally legitimate Parliament decided, by 544 votes to 53 that a binary In/Out, expressed as Remain/Leave, referendum be held on Britain’s #EU membership
2/12
In June 2016, by a majority of over 1 million, and in the biggest democratic mandate for one specific policy in UK political history, the electorate voted in that referendum to Leave.
3/12
That vote to Leave was not qualified in any way,
It was not subject to any conditions.
It was not a vote to Leave only partially.
It was not a vote to Leave in name only,
It was not a vote to leave but only subject to a deal.
It was a vote to just Leave. Full stop.
4/12
In February 2017, a still constitutionally legitimate Parliament decided, by 498 votes to 114, to implement that vote to Leave, by issuing Britain’s Article 50 notification
5/12
In June 2017, the Conservative Party emerged from a General Election as the largest party in Parliament, and was thus constitutionally empowered to form a government
6/12
In July 2019, the Conservative Party elected, in accordance with its own internal constitution and leadership election rules, a new Leader.
7/12
That newly, and legitimately, elected new Leader, as leader of still the largest party in Parliament, was constitutionally empowered to become Prime Minister and form a government.
8/12
That constitutionally legitimate Prime Minister and Government are constitutionally implementing the decision of the electorate in a constitutionally legitimate referendum whose outcome was put into effect by a constitutionally legitimate Parliament
9/12
Notwithstanding 1-8 above, Opposition party leaders who, despite their platitudes to the contrary, remain implacably against any Brexit, not just a No-Deal iteration of it as they claim, will today meet to plot its blocking and preferably its cancellation or reversal
10/12
They propose ousting the current constitutionally legitimate government, to install in its place a mis-named “Government of National Unity” excluding non-Remainers & disenfranchising over 50% of the 2016 referendum electorate, without a scintilla of democratic legitimacy
11/12
Yet they have the gall and hypocrisy to do so under the banner of a #BlockTheCoup hashtag, pretending, in a grotesque inversion of the truth, that theirs is a principled resistance to a constitutionally illegitimate government which itself assumed power in a coup.
12/12
Even by the standards we have come to expect from the democracy-averse Remainer–Left, what they propose is in effect their own coup d'etat , born out of contempt for the electorate, the constitution, and democracy itself
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If there's going to be a geography-based plot to replace Johnson, suspect that one originating in Melton Mowbray is far more likely to result in a new Tory leader who's actually a conservative than one originating in either Cameroon Notting Hill or Goldsmith Richmond.
As @GoodwinMJ suggests in this thread, if the Tories were to elect a new Party Leader/PM ideologically grounded in Notting Hill/Richmond, rather than the shires & the Red Wall, their chances of retaining power are much lower. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1481612…
To survive in office in the medium-to-long term, they need to engage with, and 'lean into' the political realignment that the UK is going through, not shy away from it retreat into a Home Counties/SE England metro-'liberal' comfort zone.
With this decision, the medico-totalitarian Australian government, both in legislative & judicial forms, has placed itself beyond the boundaries of civilised society.
Utter disgrace. telegraph.co.uk/tennis/2022/01…
Abundantly clear that Djokovic has been targeted & punished, not b/c he is healthy & infection-free but just unvaccinated, but b/c he's thereby a dissenter who threatens to undermine the legitimacy of the entire medico-totalitarian regime.
What a s**thole Australia's become.
And there's the proof.
"Mr Djokovic’s ongoing presence in Australia may lead to an increase in anti-vaccination sentiment generated in the Australian community"
In other words: "Dissenting opinion will not be tolerated."
100%, @CitySamuel. As if the Online Safety Bill wasn't enough of an additional threat to already under siege #FreeSpeech in Britain, the judicial-activism which awarded Meghan Markle a win without even a trial exerts a further chilling effect on it. telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
VG analysis by @CamillaTominey. Contrary to the extravagant claims made in Markle's triumphalist but victimhood-larded statement, what her legal action proved was that she does have the voice which she disingenuously insists she lacks. telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2…> #PrincessPinoccchio
Glover may be parti-pris as columnist for one of the parties; but he surely has a valid point about how Markle has now had two legal wins, but in both of which the judge decided that the matter need not even go to trial, so she never need be cross-examined mailplus.co.uk/edition/news/c…
Says it all about the Woke-Left #BiasedBBC, doesn't it, that Edwards was reprimanded for 𝙤𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 to the 'decolonisation'-inspired removal of a statue, on the grounds that its removal was 'censoring history'? telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/11/0…
And to add insult to injury, the #BBC, which never misses an opportunity to ram its own anti-heritage, anti-white woke revisionism down our throats, actually had the gall to say Edwards was risking breaching its internal impartiality guidelines.
You couldn't make it up....
And this only 2 days after D-G Davie in effect 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘥 the #BBC from responsibility to observe any impartiality or balance whatsoever on 'climate-change', b/c the BBC now regards it as so settled as to be politically uncontroversial. #DefundTheBBC
So the same #BBC that unapologetically beams the foulest language & most extreme perversions at its audience to promote the Woke-Left agenda feels the need to apologise at 3.24. a.m for a double Olympic gold-medallist dropping an F-bomb in exulting at his victory. #DefundTheBBC
THREAD 1/4 Part of my cynical brain wondering whether the Johnson Junta is actually following a devious plan to deliberately go OTT on both #oneruleforthem entitlement & repressive Covid-authoritarianism, in the hope of generating a public backlash so big...
2/4 …that it would force them to abandon all Covid restrictions as politically impossible to sustain; thus partly getting themselves off the hook for when the full reckoning for the economic & societal damage #lockdowns have already caused comes in…
3/4 …and also transferring blame from themselves on to the British people for any increase in infections, hospitalisations, etc., if either the virus continues to spread or vaccines are seen to have undesirable side effects…