This kind of originalism should just be called "magical thinking projectionism."
Or "this thought originates from my tuchus."
Or "this thought originates from my tuchus."
No surprise:
It's always @Yoo's tortured logic.
It's always @Yoo's tortured logic.
@yoo Yoo's argument tortures/exposes Judge Rao's argument:
1. The House can't subpoena a president to investigate crimes w/o impeachment.
2. House can't impeach in an election year.
3. So hey, sorry, you can't subpoena a president in an election year...
1. The House can't subpoena a president to investigate crimes w/o impeachment.
2. House can't impeach in an election year.
3. So hey, sorry, you can't subpoena a president in an election year...
@yoo 4/ Obviously, the House must be able to:
1) Investigate a president's attempts to rig an upcoming election, with or without impeachment or a specific criminal allegation.
2) And impeach (like indict) a president for such attempts to expose them, esp. in an election year.
1) Investigate a president's attempts to rig an upcoming election, with or without impeachment or a specific criminal allegation.
2) And impeach (like indict) a president for such attempts to expose them, esp. in an election year.
