Sr adv Mukul Rohatgi to appear for #DevendraFadnavis while Sr adv Maninder Singh will represent #AjitPawar today.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta will need to adduce all relevant records in the court today at the outset to enable the judges examine the Governor's decision.
#SupremeCourt clarifies it hasn't so far issued notices on the prayer to invite Sena alliance to form the government as a lawyer seeks his petition be also hears along with the present matter.
My Lordships would have heard about horse trading but this could be a case where the entire stable has been stolen: Tushar Mehta submits to SC in #MaharashtraGovtFormation
Mehta says he is appearing for the Secretary of the Governor since Governor can't be a party in person. He seeks some time to file a detailed reply on behalf of the Governor in the #MaharashtraGovtFormation case.
Mega submits documents to show #AjitPawar submitted a letter of support to the Governor with signatures of 54 NCP MLAs.
Mehta submits documents to show #AjitPawar submitted a letter of support to the Governor with signatures of 54 NCP MLAs.
Following Ajit Pawar's letter dated 22nd Nov, Fadnavis staked claim along with letters of support of 11 independent and other MLAs. The Governor then wrote to the President, requesting for revocation of the President's Rule.
With parties changing stands and politicians changing stand, how can the Governor act seeing what may happen in the future, Mehta tells SC adding there was no reason for the Governor to doubt the letters of support.
SC observes that the only question today is whether the CM enjoys the majority in the House or not. Rohatgi replies floor-test is imperative but once this court finds the Governor's decision was not wrong, this court can't set a timeline etc.
"It is for the Governor to decide all this. There will be a Speaker chosen and he will then proceed with the floor-test as the first agenda of the house. But there is nothing left for the SC to decide since there is nothing wrong with the Governor's decision": Rohatgi
SG Mehta: "Can a party come to this court and say if a floor test doesn't take place within 24 hours, my MLAs could run away again? Can SC monitor the proceedings of the House? It is constitutionally barred after all."
The Governor after all has invited the single largest party. BJP has more than double the numbers on its own. It isn't as if any imposter is going to run the government. No interim order should be passed vy this court: SG Mehta
Pawar's lawyer Maninder Singh argues: "There is nothing to contradict my list. I was authorised to lend support on the day I gave that letter. I will resolve disputes within my party but this petition must end now."
His lawyer Maninder Singh adds this court couldn't have entertained this petition since SC has held in the #Karnataka case that leap-frogging can't be allowed.
Sibal begins for #ShivSena by saying the jockey might have run away but horses are still here.
"We would have staked claim on 23rd if this wouldn't have had happened. What was the national emergency to revoke President's Rule at 5 AM and appoint a CM at 8 in the morning?" Sibal
Pre-poll alliance fell out since promises made before elections were not honoured. And there were ideological differences too, Shiv Sena's lawyer Kapil Sibal tells SC, adding he has original affidavits of 154 MLAs supporting the Sena alliance.
#SupremeCourt refuses to go into aspect of revocation of President's Rule, points out this isn't a part of their petition and the Sena petition didn't even challenge it.
AM Singhvi appears for NCP, Congress, tried to place on record affidavits signed by 154 MLAs to show their support but the #SupremeCourt refuses to accept it, saying it can't now expand the scope of the petition. Singhvi withdraws the affidavits.
Singhvi also presses for a floor test today or tomorrow. Tushar Mehta interferes, saying when a letter was submitted to the Governor to withdraw Ajit Pawar's authority, 12 signatures were missing.
Rohatgi: "The plea now is to have this court act as the Speaker of the House and decide on everything. Speaker is yet to be chosen, house is to be convened but they want the Supreme Court to preempt everything."
"" Governor has given 14 days but it isn't 14 months. Should this court now substitute the Governor's views with its own?" asks Rohatgi. He adds will this court also give a timeline for everything, including when should the MLAs have their lunch on the day of the floor-test.
Appearing for #DevendraFadnavis, Rohatgi opposes floor test by a protem speaker. He says the business of the House should be allowed to continue and only a full-time speaker should conduct the floor test. He opposes any order on floor test.
Sadhguru's Isha Foundation moves the #SupremeCourt, challenging the Madras HC order that led to police personnel entering the ashram to conduct inquiries. Central government supports the petition.
Sr adv Mukul Rohatgi seeks an urgent hearing today.
Rohatgi to SC: There's someone behind all this. The habeas corpus petition filed by the mother of two women, who are now monks, was disposed of 8 years ago. Now, the father comes back and despite the monks expressing their desire to stay put, the high court ordered inquiry.
#CJI enquires if the two women are online.
Rohatgi says the women are connected online and are willing to make a statement right away.
#SupremeCourt reproaches the #Kerala Govt over #lockdown relaxations owing to #Bakrid. SC calls it shocking state of affairs that the state government gave in to pressure groups.
SC adds affidavit by the #Kerala Govt is alarming & doesn't in real manner safeguards right to life guaranteed to all the citizens of #India.
#SupremeCourt underlines if there is any spread of the infection due to the relaxations by the #Kerala Govt owing to #Bakrid, any person can bring it to the notice of the court which will then take appropriate action.
Hearing to commence before the #SupremeCourt on suo motu on the #KanwarYatra.
An application has been filed in this matter by @pkdnambiar against relaxation of lockdown norms in #Kerala for #Bakrid celebrations.
Hearing begins. Court goes through the latest affidavit by the #UttarPradesh Govt, cancelling the #KanwarYatra.
Sr adv CS Vaidyanathan reads out the affidavit that states that kanwar sanghs have themselves decided not to have the #KanwarYatra & hence, no orders from the state disaster management authority is required.
Of 527 pages on acquittal of Tarun Tejpal, #Goa judge Kshama M Joshi has used around 400 pages, dissecting testimony of the complainant in arriving at how an 'educated journalist' should've known whether she 'pulled up' her underwear or 'picked up'.
Goa court scans the complainant's phone & messages to note that "it was entirely the norm" for her to have flirtatious relationships & sexual conversations with friends & acquaintances.
Since she refused to give access to her email citing concerns of privacy when her phone details had already been used to humiliate her over her personal details, #Goa judge holds that she "wants to hide something."
#SupremeCourt issues notices to #WestBengal Govt & Centre on a PIL for a SIT probe into post-poll violence in the state & massive displacement of people.
SC also seeks responses from national commissions for women & children on providing relief in camps etc. Next hearing in June
Another petition filed by families of two #BJP supporters allegedly killed by #TMC workers will also be taken up by the #SupremeCourt later today.
#WestBengal Govt, through sr adv Sidharth Luthra, points out that post-poll violence matter is already pending before a five-judge bench in the #Calcutta HC and hence, the #SupremeCourt may not need to hear this matter at this juncture.
#SupremeCourt commences hearing of its suo motu proceedings on ameliorating the conditions of migrant workers during the #COVID19 induced #lockdown.
It expresses displeasure at Centre not submitting its affidavit in time.
"You were directed to file your affidavit a day before the hearing but you have done it just now. Our orders are meant to be compiled with," SC tells Centre.
Adv Prashant Bhushan, appearing on behalf of some activists, addresses the shortcomings in replies filed by states.
SC clarifies it hasn't directed states to grant cash transfer in lieu of dry ration after Bhushan mentions that court also wanted to know about cash transfers.
As he talks about cooked food, SC observes the situation doesn't appear to be as grave as last year for migrant workers