@stophatred2 It was one researcher commenting on another researcher's study. One person could be wrong. The other could be wrong. Or they both could be wrong. That is why you actually cite the source. So please, cite the source. The fact that one person allegedly is refuting someone else...
@stophatred2 Should demonstrate to even you that just because a study is published, that doesn't make it right. I have no way to see if a refutation is valid if I can't see the actual study with all data included.
@stophatred2 And I already told you about the tactic used that gets homosexuality off the hook, so to speak. An adult male molesting a 5 year old wouldn't be considered a homosexual unless he also engages in sex with males his own age. So you could have 1000 cases an adult man....
@stophatred2 Assaulting a 5 year old, and NONE of those cases being considered evidence of homosexual molestation. Bogus. It's a shell game.
