"The idea was to create a strategy of influence, which means we can [...] write papers with other countries." Then why don't you? Why the total opposition to #Spitzenkandidat and not reform it? Why the solo position on #NorthMacedonia? Or the solo tribune before #EUelections?
"[Macron] established the @RenewEurope group in the European Parliament; positioned close allies at the helm of the ECB and European Council." But where is #France in the Directorate-Generals? Or as "DirCab"? Where is all the middle management that Germany has groomed patiently?
“Evidently, creating leadership also means creating friction” But it certainly doesn't need to. #Leadership isn't always "pushing people around and being loud". Leaders can work in consultation, influence and foster group work.
“When the president speaks loudly, his objective isn’t to ruffle feathers.” But it always does. How about remembering #TheodoreRoosevelt? "Speak softly and carry a big stick." Speaking loudly with no stick isn't leadership.
"Asked what Macron would choose to tackle if he could just push through one reform next year, @CBeaune answers “migration.”" For that and many other topics, it is essential to do away with #consensus and #unanimity. I do not recall @EmmanuelMacron supporting this change. Does he?
"The EU’s inability to find a solution [...] is an example of its “habit of inertia and indecision” on urgent issues." No, it's that every Member State looks at its own electorate before thinking of European citizens. This is the way the @EUCouncil works and it needs reform.
“Europe has to get used to wielding power itself” Yes, but then Member States must give that power to democratic EU institutions, and not expect to keep it in 28 separate hands. #TreatyChange must shift relevant national power to the EU level.
I realise this thread may seem overly critical; it is not meant to be. But this article reaffirms the stance that we observe: instead of bringing people together and agreeing to go past consensus decisions, @EmmanuelMacron wants to forge ahead and implement his Sorbonne speech.
There is a lot to support in the Sorbonne speech and a lot I personally agree with. But the method matters, the way we do things matters. And if a large country is always playing alone, its good ideas will be rejected. Not based on content, but out of spite.
Governance works when a legitimate gov leads action and the people's representatives discuss & agree. The Commission isn't yet that gov and no single country can act as such. We need a stronger @EU_Commission, a stronger @Europarl_EN, and for the @EUCouncil to take a step back.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @APPF_EU unveiled the latest official MEP membership figures for #europeanparties, which will be used to calculate their entitlements to EU public funding. Here is what's what 👇
❌ Worthy of note: sharp nose-dive for virtually all pro-EU forces: @EPP, @PES_PSE, @ALDEParty, @europeangreens, @PDE_EDP, and EFA (even @europeanleft).
Only net winner: the @LeftAlliance_EU, but mostly because it starts from zero.
❌ Conversely, the winners (except ELA) are all on the hard/far-right: @PatriotsEU, @ECRparty, and ESN.
Today, @POLITICOEurope's Playbook reports on two EU political alliances missing out on EU funds "because the paperwork is too complicated". A great opportunity to discuss the funding of #europeanparties! 🥳🇪🇺
A quick 🧵... 1/23
@euleftalliance @APPF_EU @EDC_eudemocracy
First of all, what are we talking about? This is about a special stream of European public funding set aside for #europeanparties and distributed every year. Out of that envelope, 10% is distributed equally to all parties and 90% proportionally to their number of MEPs. 2/23
But, actually, this turns out to be more about registration than funding. In the meantime, if you want to really understand the funding of European parties, hear this way 👇 3/23 epfo.eu/understanding-…
Over the past several years, @EDC_eudemocracy has made many, many requests to the European Parliament to access decisions by its Bureau on the funding of #europeanparties. These included decisions for funding (for the coming year) and final accounts (which wrap up the process).
Invariably, these documents were provided with heavy redactions over the parts covering the EP's reasoning for its decisions: we could see the outcome (amounts), but not how decisions were made. Until yesterday, the latest full document related to funding for 2015 -- 8 years ago.
To be clear, the point of this thread is *not* to argue that TNLs will make our common election less European, simply that they will not remedy the election's core deficiency (that national parties are in control) and that, therefore, they are not the right way forward. 3/25