1/
I agree that just having one’s attributes determined by
2/
Additionally
3/
If we operate under the premise that most PC’s are created as adults and/or that their background represents at least a few years of their life, then that would affect their
4/
Now with all that said, I don’t think we should completely disregard the attributes of the races as presented. Because sometimes those racial tendencies can be relevant or informative (it would make sense that orcs and goliaths
5/
So now that I see two viable options on how a person’s attributes would be determined, which system makes more sense?
My answer came to that it depend entirely on the player. And then I
6/
Each character is a representation of the players imagination or sense of representation, often as a way for them to excessive agency in ways that they may not always find able to in their day-to-day lives.
7/
Now, once the player has picked their race, applicable sub-race, and background they would get to assign
8/
9/
With those options from race and background, a player would then use their ASI points to choose which stats THEY WANT boosted limited to no more than +2 in a stat (humans don’t get to add +6 lol)
10/
11/
12/
13/
Just some random D&D thoughts 🤷♂️
#dnd
End.