Leah & Ezra’s piece speaks for itself, so I’m gonna talk a bit about the counterpoint piece the Inquirer ran. (1/N)
… wait for it …
… Neal Gorsuch. (2/N)
Take it up with McConnell, pal.
(4/N)
(5/N)
So, I retort, what? The intent and the effect are the same. Your objection is mere semantics.
The best way to un-do what Republicans did is to add seats.
(6/N)
(8/N)
(9/N)
So anyway: McGinley’s bullshitting you when he pretends the current court’s conservatives are free of partisan influence or intent.
(10/N)
Again: GOP donor interests are *undefeated* in close votes in the Roberts court.
(11/N)
But the current court is bent to the will of America’s political *minority.* Surely that’s worse?
(12/N)
A narrow political minority has seized control of the court.
(13/N)
Minority rule is what they’re after. It’s how they keep power. Don’t let them.
(14/14)
politico.com/news/2020/03/2…
Yeah, he’s a liar.
Now he’s pushing judges to retire so Trump can replace them. washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…