Their latest = #carehomes
It's part of the "we're following the science" ritual. But are we? You don't need to dig much to say: I'm sorry, we ain't following the right scientists
The scientists we need - the ones with feet-on-the-ground experience in slowing #COVID19, keeping care homes safe? Our Government has excluded them.
No, I'm not kidding.
let's get into it:
I shout at the TV, again.
Our "Medical Advisor" had just said at UKGov's #coronavirus press conference, we had nothing to learn from "developing markets" in the strategy for #covid19
She helped. No real scientist could ever say that
I'll try to make this interesting
I mean come on - how can this be "science".
We knew Jan 9th
We took no action until March 11th
Because we had a #HerdImmunityIsMurder plan
So we didn't order PPE, Tests, Ventilators
Didn't even put NHS on alert.
Scientists are cautious by nature. That's RECKLESS
Even a Tory minister can do it. People are dying - why wouldn't you?
There is one reason
That DAMN option (B). We should have people who know.
I'm not being arrogant or complacent.
The UK used to have the best Community Medicine scientists in the world.
No, honestly
Those ones in Green - they're OPTION B. But you're not getting #carehome insight. So you go digging.
You find that the World Health Organisation rushed out guidelines on this mid-March.
Hmm, that's a bit odd, why would it rush them?
who.int/publications-d…
You notice WHO's first guidelines on #Covid19 care came out JANUARY 26th!! (all below)
It's good stuff. Better than ours. Much earlier too.
And they mention PPE, masks and contact tracing...?
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream…
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream…
apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…
You spot something.
They're NOT written about Covid-19
Is this why you didn't see them?
They were for MERS, re-rewritten for Jan 26th to serve for #COVID19
You know care home guidelines at the time were poor. So why didn't your predecessor issue these?
It looks to you like the WHO took these same guidelines and republished them AGAIN on March 17th under "covid-19".
You're no virology professional but you can't find anything that would explain why they weren't issued either time.
It makes no sense
So you dig more.
It's weird. As you read, it's almost as if THEY'RE speaking to YOU
"Stop saying MERS isn't Covid-19, the guidelines are valid
& we've even included evidential links to C-19. Maybe do something about it before you have a massive care home problem? You used to be good!"
But, if we're good at this, why do you have no community medicine?
Why is this all such a mess?
Are they important?
Could they help?
Good questions
Back in 2013, these heroes stopped a MERS epidemic in the UK. And YOU'VE never heard of them.
eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…
What did these mystery heroes do in 2013?
+Contact tracing - obsessively
+Airline and airport management ANYONE anywhere near the carrier on planes
+Non-NHS care & PPE management
+Massive community testing
That looks important to you, what happened? You read on.
It started with 1 person visiting the Middle East
He came back, sick, almost died in hospital
That's when heroes got involved
The first person he infected then died
But this team obsessed about the detail
ANYONE who had contact was identified and traced
EVERYONE!
In 2013 it took them a month, contacts of contacts of contacts!
They DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TESTS to start with.
Just good eyes, detailed casework, and an understanding of respiratory infection.
In the end, 200 were tracked down.
Only 3 died
These people knew their stuff!
You pick up your list of scientific advisors, start checking them off
Epidemic ✅✅✅✅✅
Clinical✅✅✅✅
Immunology✅
MicroBiology✅
Sociology✅
Psychology✅
Community/Public Health❌
You go just a little bit cold.
This looks like a lot of thinkers
But no doers
Of course, you'd seen he Government advice from science, at least the bits the Secretary of State would share. Not the good behind the scenes stuff from Cabinet.
To the extent you could understand, it seemed excellent.
But for one thing. You couldn't judge omissions
To you and me, this is a Godsend. Lives saved.
As a Minister, you're aware enough to know that solutions that identify huge Government failings but are too late to solve aren't solutions at all.
The secretary will need a scapegoat.
OBS - You reach for your EU file
Crap. They produced extensive documentation on exactly these issues
AND it's from the part of the EU that you've just been arguing you need to leave, even when everyone in medicine said you shouldn't.
#BREXIT always makes things worse
ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/…
Reluctantly, because you need them, you reach for the selection process. It's a tough call but the rule is it's never the Government's fault.
The scientists do have a role in the selection process, good. BLAME
But RESPONSIBILITY IS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Crap!
Crap, crap and double crap.
What to do now?
a) Hope to God you solve this before some numbskull on Twitter starts to pull it together?
b) Or we could do the right thing before more die? Admit it. maybe even get that team?
Damn option (B) - never gets picked
I'd like to say this was a one-off - but it's an epidemic in UKGov - over and over again. The "No point looking elsewhere" virus
3 examples of many
Elderly Guidelines
Lockdown Exit
Viral Control