Here’s my reasoning:
1. ‘Avg revenue/user doesn’t stack up’ - As per this news it has 2.4 mill paying customers and a 2019 Revenue of $78 mill (from Wikipedia).
techcrunch.com/2020/05/01/ind…
For ease assume per month registration as straight line = ~3 mill.
And as per news 150% addition in March = 6 mill.
With avg growth at 400% for over 4 years in a row. With schools shuttered the jump should have been 5x min?
Needs a relook.
Clearly shows a large channel + field force led sales approach.
1. Everything has gone digital, even office work is at home
2. Every interaction is online and recorded
3. Even the least techsavvy speaker/teacher is now a producer of digital content by default
(Even I launched WorkLifeTV 😊)
4. Content tsunami is here
6. Subscriptions will get cheaper or be replaced with ad supported models
7. Discretionary & supplementary digital content will be a cognitive overload & shunned
8. Jobs, incomes and spending are all impacted
All of these are headwinds for BYJUs.
A. BYJUs is a tutor turned Edtech biz offering a substitute to bad teachers in schools
B. Good teachers were confined to the 4walls of good schools or to tution classes - brick & mortar
D. The digital pdt itself is just a format advantage - no new curriculum structures at all
1. The constraints of the 4 walls are gone. Nothing is brick & mortar.
2. Everyone is digital so ‘reach’ advantage is gone
3. There’s hardly a pdt (format)differentiation except quality
1. Zoom calls with students recorded, annotated and converted into explanations (almost zero cost as everything is a sunk cost)
2. Innovators find aggregation opportunities and approach these teachers
I recall @sampad tell me about a tutor in semiurban India who is a superhit.
With all such ‘equilibrium’ the one most impacted is usually the dominant player. In this case BYJUs.
(Pardon any errors)