Sue says now when we talk about restoration we are not necessarily talking about forest. Rarely do we mean return to a pristine state. We must be careful fo the restoration through fortress conservation model.
But before we head into the future, lets look back on the question of 'how did we get here?' - a key role of the Green Revolution.
Much of the promises for the decade of restoration have been made under the Bonn Challenge..
So what about the commitments then? Analysis shows that some countries have committed to restore 80% or even more than 100% of the total land area (or at least agricultural land)!
So what do programmes and projects actually deliver? Most focus on the proximate socio-economic factors. Rarely do restoration efforts attempt to influence the underlying drivers, especially at higher scales.
When it comes to trees in landscapes, let's consider a holistic approach to land restoration, understanding the interactions between agriculture and trees, incl. through #agroforestry
Now Sue presents 3 myths around restoration that need to be busted. First up, Tree Planting is not enough..
First off, we need to think of Tree Growing, a la @duguma_l
She reminds us, different trees provide different traits, like nitrogren fixing, water infiltration ..
Myth 2 - One Iconic Practice will be the sole solution.
No! It depends on the context. Different practices might be useful in different places..
Besides practices, what about strategies? @RegreenAfrica learning by doing - e.g. women's groups and #access!
Susan's now on to Myth 3 - Technologies will be enough
Wrong again! It depends just as much on governance and social aspects
Role of youth and women for instance..
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today is #Halfearthday2021, a plan to protect 50% of the earth, to stop #biodiversity loss & prevent #climate change. Wow, a plan to #restore the planet: that's hopeful!? Unfortunately, not. There is good science showing this is the wrong direction... 🧵 (1/5) #COP26#COP15
2/5. Every funder should know that if a Half Earth proposal lands on their desk, there will be social risks. Despite the cosy rhetoric, Fortress Conservation leads to #humanrights abuses. Protecting 50% of the globe could affect >1 billion ppl, per Schleicher et al., 2019
3/5. Ecologists, none the wiser, might consider this a price worth paying if species are protected from #extinction. It's a mistake made by Kim Stanley Robinson. The great myth is that people are bad for biodiversity, as shown by Ellis et al., 2021 👇 pnas.org/content/118/17…
"The recent radical ideas to save nature; namely ‘half earth’ (nature needs half) and ‘new conservation’ further threatens biodiversity conservation and community livelihoods" - Wilhelm Kiwango #pollen20
Challenging the mainstream narrative at this crucial time #rewilding
George Iordachescu highlights the long history of collective management of large forested and pasture areas. #Commons management goes back 1000 years, transcending nature-culture divide and drawing on local #knowledge. Conservation not the main goal (it's #livelihoods) #pollen20
Emmanuel Akanpurira unpacks some of the assumptinos Fortress Conservation is based upon.
He draws on Butler and Membe to deconstruct assumptions about human-wildlife conflict.
Work from Uganda shows conflict not inevitable but due to authority-grabs by conservation NGOs..
"Market based solutions dominate policy proposals but remain consisently marginal to actually addressing the problems" says @FoleyPfalzgraf, as part of her careful and revealing #POLLEN20 pres:
Foley places a carbon offsetting scheme in Vanuatu as part of a history marked by colonialism, deforestation and depopulation
Foley notes that since the introduction of customry forest management, deforestation has been reduced to virtually zero. Despite having zero responsibility for global emissions, Vanuatu's leaders have turned to tree growing as a mitigation strategy..
Reading Judith Butler's 'Bodies that Matter' and wondering why dominant strains of Green thinking are apparently happy to put up with 'Environment' (as a 'domain of abjection'), as the absence of something, and all that this it entails.. #environmentalhumanities
To clarify, Butler is here, if I understand correctly, talking about how the disciplinary category of sex (the material dimension of of gender) is key to emerging as a subject (becoming a conscious *somewhere* as a particular subject shaped through the recursive work of power)
So, I contend (and am not the first to do so) we can extend this into the environmental domain by understanding the human subjectification process as one in which categories like 'nature' and 'environment' are required to become conscious subjects.