.@UniofOxford prof Deborah Cameron notes👇a key respect in which small group teaching is a greater Covid risk than large lectures, casting doubt on @Cambridge_Uni's moving large lectures online while keeping small group teaching in person. (@AlistairJarvis @michelledonelan) 1/
I'm devoting a single thread to her comments (originally posted on Facebook & reposted on Twitter with her permission), since I do not think their significance has yet fully registered with higher education, government & public health officials. 2/
To drive home their significance, I first draw attention to this👇passage in (linked) US @CDCgov guidance for higher education:
"COVID-19 is mostly spread by respiratory droplets released when people TALK, cough, or sneeze" (my emphasis). 3/
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
On the CDC's (linked) "How COVID-19 Spreads" webpage, talking is also listed alongside coughing and sneezing, in the second of four bullet-pointed means by which the virus "mainly" spreads👇. 4/
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
Why does the CDC group something as apparently innocuous as talking together with coughing & sneezing as a significant risk factor? 5/
Because of mounting evidence, via case studies (some w detailed CDC analysis), that talking (or singing) was the most likely means by which Covid-19 was spread from a single individual to many others indoors, more than 2 meters away, via inhalation into their lungs. 6/
See this linked analysis👇of case studies by @Erinbromage, a Comparative Immunologist and Professor of Biology. 7/
erinbromage.com/post/the-risks…
See also this survey of 58 case studies of "superspreader events" (SSE) by @jonkay, in which he draws attention to the dog that didn't bark👇. 8/
quillette.com/2020/04/23/cov…
👆is of special relevance to this thread, since a large lecture, generally involving a single speaking individual, at some distance from the audience, is akin to @jonkay's red-underlined events that are absent from the list of SSEs. 9/
In addition to noting this fact in 1/👆, Deborah Cameron also draws attention to the respects in which small, participatory group teaching shares the risk factors of various catalogued SSEs. 10/
Why, then, are universities such as @Cambridge_Uni moving apparently less risky events online (large lectures), & trying to keep the apparently more risky events in person (small group teaching)? 11/
Here's one rationale (see linked @Cambridge_Uni statement 👇): even if they're not inherently very risky, cancelling large lectures will free up space to allow for small group teaching which conforms to govt guidelines of 2 metre social distancing. 12/
cam.ac.uk/coronavirus/ne…
There is a problem with this proposed solution: when we're all spread out by 2 metres, we'll all need to speak more loudly to compensate for the larger distances. 13/
Moreover, "Highly sensitive laser light scattering observations have revealed that loud speech can emit thousands of oral fluid droplets per second". Please read entire quoted abstract👇of study, for relevance to small group teaching indoors. 14/
pnas.org/content/early/…
We also have mounting evidence that a single loudly speaking or singing individual can spread Covid-19 far more than 2 metres over time: e.g., throughout a restaurant, a volleyball-court-sized space, or the large floor of a call centre. See @erinbromage 👇. 15/
UK govt's current one-size-fits-all application of 2 metre social distancing to parks, garden centres, open plan offices, classrooms & public transport undermines their credibility. 2 metre social distancing is not some universal magic barrier. It doesn't work like this👇. 16/
.@Cambridge_Uni & others will need to go beyond current govt guidance to render classrooms safe for students & staff. See this thread for more on the risks of small group teaching 👇 & the measures (testing & face masks) necessary to mitigate them. 17/17
Link to a thread about the sort of testing & tracing necessary to make universities safe... 1/
...and how (in combination with adequate testing) the procurement & provision of proper faskmasks (e.g., PPF1 N90) might make it possible to safely resume small group in person teaching in the autumn. 2/
Universities will need assistance from the government to deliver on testing & facemasks. See this thread on South Korea v the UK, regarding the good that a government can do, when it has got its act together. 3/3
.@UniofOxford & @Cambridge_Uni tutors, please click here👇& read upward for a discussion of risks specific to the Oxbridge tutorial. (@OxfordUCU @CambridgeUCU)
See Japan's guidance, in contrast to the UK's: "avoid the Three Cs: closed-in spaces [with insufficient ventilation], crowds, and conversations." 1/
Japan's population is nearly twice as large as the UK's & they're much closer to the Wuhan source of the pandemic. They've had about 16k total infections & are now recording about 80 new infections each day👇. 2/
endcoronavirus.org/countries?item…
By contrast, the UK has had about 240k total infections & are now recording about 3,500 new infections each day👇. Whom should we trust, in choosing between the conflicting Covid public health advice of these two countries? 3/3
endcoronavirus.org/countries?item…
Further evidence that being in the same small seminar room with an infected person for an extended period of time is more dangerous than being in the same large lecture theatre as that person: 1/
Linked👇study involving two buses that transported individuals to a Temple event. An infected person was on one of the two buses. 2/
researchgate.net/publication/34…
This is what happened👇(quoting from linked Vox piece, whose author @B_resnick also interviews @mugecevik). 3/
vox.com/science-and-he…
So when one is in the same small space (e.g., bus, seminar room) as an infected person for an extended period of time, the chances of infection are much higher than if you share the same large space (e.g., temple, large lecture theatre). 4/
Note also that the absolute number (24) infected by this individual because they shared the same bus is much higher than the absolute number (7) infected by this individual because they were in the same temple (and whom the study describes as in close proximity). 5/
A plausible hypothesis is that the virus dispersed to a greater extent through the larger space of the temple, and hence others didn't breathe in as high a concentration. 6/6
I've added two new tweets to my @UniofOxford & @Cambridge_Uni tutors subthread. 1st new tweet👇. 1/ (@OxfordUCU @CambridgeUCU)
Below are some words from @BoltonUni's VC in defence of their plans to re-open👇. If only small, enclosed, unventilated classrooms & seminar rooms were as easy to re-open as large, outdoor garden centres....
theboltonnews.co.uk/news/18467963.…
.@Penn has announced plans for in person teaching: only for classes w 25 or fewer, but with "facial coverings" & "could even include newly installed Plexiglas barriers for separating lecturers from the audience", in addition to physical distancing.
coronavirus.upenn.edu/announcement/m…
Excerpt👇from an article by @xtophercook, which is relevant to the theme of this thread. 1/
Article from which excerpted👇. 2/2
.@adamtickell & other VC's need to assure staff & students that they will not merely rely on what govt guidance allows -- that they will also provide us w the evidence that this is safe. 1/
ft.com/content/3cd114…
Universities cannot repeat the mistake that some made in March of simply relying on govt guidance back then. 2/2
UK govt's response to concerns regarding airborne Covid transmission in courtrooms is alarming👇. It indicates that they're ignoring an increasing body of evidence of such transmission, esp via speaking.
lawgazette.co.uk/news/dont-worr…
🚨🚨🚨This👇, published in Science yesterday, DIRECTLY contradicts UK govt claim👆of low risk of airborne Covid-19 transmission. Also calls for universal wearing of masks. @UniversitiesUK & @AlistairJarvis please take note of inadequacy of govt guidance.
science.sciencemag.org/content/early/…
This @NewYorker interview w Harvard prof of medicine & health care policy @Asaf_Bitton provides further evidence of how out of step w scientific & public health consensus the UK govt is on airborne transmission & masks.
newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/h…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Otsuka

Michael Otsuka Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MikeOtsuka

Dec 1, 2021
🧵explaining what's so wrong with @USSEmployers VC Alistair Fitt's claim on @BBCr4today that "Modelling published by the @USSpensions trustee themselves shows that impact [of UUK's proposed pension cuts] is likely to be between 10% & 18% for the vast majority of members." 1/
As I've drawn to @USSEmployers's attention on more than one occasion👇, the 10-18% range is based on an outdated & otherwise indefensible assumption which understates the detrimental effect of the 2.5% cap on CPI revaluation. Please read🧵👇. 2/
.@ucu noted that this assumption was so indefensible that persisting with it would expose the consultation to legal challenge. We maintained that our actuary @FirstActuarial's modelling of the inflation cap was far more accurate. 3/
Read 28 tweets
Oct 21, 2021
In his 18 Oct letter to @ucu GS @DrJoGrady, @AlistairJarvis repeats this false £860 claim.👇 He writes: "a university staff member earning £40,000 per annum would be paying an additional £860 in pension contributions next year for the same benefits". 1/
The actual annual increase is +£550, not +£860. When we break this down by month, paying an extra £40 per month from April to Oct 2022 would make it possible for this member to retain current pension benefits rather than take the hit of the UUK cuts.👇2/
The extra £40 per month = a rise from £327 to £367 paid each month. That's a 12% increase to avoid UUK's reduction in their future accrual from 1/75 to 1/85 during that period, PLUS UUK's reduction in the upper limit of inflation protection from 10% to 2.5%. 3/
Read 28 tweets
Jun 5, 2021
🚨🚨🚨The SAUL pension scheme announces that it is in SURPLUS -- 109% funded -- as at 31 April 2021. It was, however, in deficit -- 94% funded -- as at 31 March 2020 triennial valuation date. (@JosephineCumbo) 1/
saul.org.uk/#/page/sauls-h… Image
It appears that SAUL's actuary has certified the Schedule of Contributions at 30 April 2021 date of signing rather than 31 March 2020 valuation date. Hence the schedule assumes a surplus & therefore no deficit recovery contributions. 2/
While past pensions promises are more than fully funded, the cost of making pension promises in future years is now estimated to cost 35% if benefits and investment strategy remains the same. This is 13% above the current 22% contribution rate (6% member, 16% employer). 3/
Read 11 tweets
Apr 11, 2021
A thread on why I share our @ucu GS's reaction👇to the recent @USSEmployers proposal to cut our pensions by lowering the DB/DC threshold from £60k to £40k, reducing accrual from 1/75 to 1/85, & capping CPI revaluation at 2.5%. 1/
As @jogrady mentions, this proposal is almost identical to the instantly reviled & reject March 2018 ACAS agreement. Here's why it's a provocation for @USSEmployers to try to push this through once again. 2/
On 1 October, @USSpensions contributions are scheduled to rise by 4 percentage points from 30.7% (9.6% member, 21.1% @USSEmployer) to 34.7% (11% member [+1.4], 23.7% employer [+2.6]). This increase was scheduled under the last 2018 valuation. 3/
Read 24 tweets
Jan 3, 2021
.@ucl's outgoing & incoming heads have issued a statement👇that stands out for its acknowledgement of how bad things are in London, its responsibility to the wider community, & of what needs to be done. (@SusanLiautaud) 1/3
ucl.ac.uk/news/2021/jan/… Image
The statement notes👇that their position is out in front of the current position of the UK govt but correctly maintains that this is the most responsible course of action. Also draws attention to the risks of travel into London when transmission is dangerously high. 2/3 Image
.@ucl has stood out during the pandemic for taking its public health responsibilities to the wider community seriously. They've led with their actions rather than waiting (in vain) for the government to provide cover by telling them to do what they know they ought to do. 3/3
Read 10 tweets
Oct 18, 2020
🚨UK longitudinal study of 201 individuals with #LongCovid reveals a high proportion are relatively young & without pre-existing health conditions. Also reveals "almost 70%…have impairment in one or more organs four months after initial symptoms". 1/4
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
▶️"prevalence of pre-existing conditions (obesity: 20%, hypertension: 6%; diabetes: 2%; heart disease: 4%) was low"
▶️Only 18% had been hospitalised
▶️Mean age: 44
▶️"impairment in heart (32%), lungs (33%), kidneys (12%), liver (10%), pancreas (17%), and spleen (6%)"
2/4
"In this young cohort with low prevalence of comorbidities, the extent of symptom burden and organ impairment is concerning", given the "pandemic's scale and high infection rates" among this population deemed "low risk". 3/4
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(