While this #Thread gives
#LogicalPoints For Those Who Thinks Mahabharata Is Not Real
#RT
1. It has been written in the epic from time to time that Mahabharata is an “Itihasa” which exclusively means “thus occurred”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef81/eef817db5df89779a1d7bebf32fcf93d0e3d2339" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbd68/fbd689ac824f9f85707091399918c91d9fc531ba" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/947e4/947e4678ec78008a20deda37763e901282d7b6e1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87b88/87b88927331b76e93a62a6d36ee69e9a71352a10" alt=""
Context - A number of dynasties with their long lineage of kings (more than 50 from Manu) have been presented in the work.
3.. Read the description of Kaliyuga as mentioned in Mahabharata.
Whatever Krishna said tallies with creepy, mysterious accurateness with modern life as it exists today.
4. Marine archaeology has also been utilized in India off the coast of the ancient port city of Dwaraka
5. This Sanskrit verse from the Mausala Parva 7 verse 40 of the Mahabharata, describes the disappearance of the city of Dvaraka into the sea.
7.The dynasties recorded in the Ramayan and the Mahabharata concur without a difference.
9. All places mentioned in Mahabharata are real places, all are identified as real places.
.
11.The architect of the modern atomic bomb who was in charge of the Manhattan Project was asked by