#Pandemicademia - A Thread on Online Intensives (Despair all thee who enter here...)
I am currently in the middle of delivering an intensive course on Remedies - all online. It is exhausting. Maintaining student engagement is... problematic. I thought I would share a few thought
Firstly, I think the students are finding it very hard to find the time to keep up with the materials/lectures/seminars. This is particularly acute for an intensive. In F2F Intensives there is recognition that students need to dedicate time and attend to be able to cope
The online context has been very different. Buy in to start with was fine - 75% attended the first lecture (which I delivered live on Zoom) [as an aside this is a good tip for those delivering new online courses, as it allows Q and connection]
Subsequent recorded lectures have seen a slow but steady fading of viewership (1 student watched the last lecture....)
In contrast, I will consistently get 70% attendance at my Admin law lectures when taught F2F. That figure will start higher, but remain pretty consistent throughout the semester
We are consistently getting about 50% attendance at seminars - but very poor engagement/preparation. Normally students in intensives attend and engage. Online, we are finding silence in breakout rooms is common. Preparation non-existent
This is not me ragging on my students.
Rather, I think the intersection of Online + Intensive is making the problem acute. Many students are trying to attend online seminars from work ("Oh, I can talk I am at work...")
Without the dedicated lecture time, they are trying to find time to fit viewing the lecture in between other commitments - the very 'flexibility' of online is counterproductive in this context.
We are (as Victoria is reminding us) still in the middle of a pandemic, and background levels of exhaustion and anxiety remain very high. Trying to find dedicated time for intensive studies in this context is problematic.
SO what has worked? We slowed down the course - made it 3 weeks of teaching instead of 2 (a benefit of online delivery was that this was easy)
I negotiated smaller seminars (2 x 20 students instead of 40) in recognition of the difficulty of online delivery of skills
Taken together, these have the effect of giving students more time to stay on top of things, and more space for dedicated learning.
I think that has helped (Though it loses something of the 'sprint' element of classic intensive, I think that would have been soul destroying)
I have found that the slides are increasingly important to learning in this context - and am spending much more time in trying to visually convey information.
Eg, these four slides help visualise different limiting principles:
I have tried to streamline and limit readings (shout-out to the magnificent @DrKatyBarnett for all her support).
But given students are no longer managing to keep up with the lecture, I think it is safe to say they are not keeping up with even these limited readings
Student are getting frustrated with each other for not engaging/talking/preparing - My breakout rooms in Torts were really productive learning spaces, as everyone was at the same level, and learnt (together) how to do online learning
In an intensive, we don't have that same capacity to develop those very new skills, with students coming in at different levels and acute time pressures. We have had to abandon some breakout room sessions as there was no meaningful engagement or dialogue.
Again, I want to be clear - this is not ragging on my students. They are trying. But the demands of:
ONLINE (with new skills required, new demands of time management, high cognitive loading) +
INTENSIVE (no time, dependent upon peer support/engagement for energy etc) is hell
After teaching 2 large courses online for the second half of last semester, I thought we had this one.
But I had not anticipated how difficult this nexus of ONLINE + INTENSIVE would be (particularly for a doctrinal course)
I still think the way to conceptualise 'normal' online delivery is "80% as good; Twice the time/effort" (which is a great bargain when the alternative is nothing...)
However, those figures just don't seem to stack up for intensives
The compression of time means the additional cognitive load becomes overwhelming; the additional time commitment irrecoverable. Students fall further and further behind.
In short: DON'T DO IT
Online Intensives (particularly for doctrinal courses) are an unholy marriage of the darkest aspects of both components. They are unfair on students; crushing on staff.
Thanks though, to @_LisaParker for her amazing efforts in delivering the course with me, and all my students who are trying so hard to make this work.
Sorry to you all...
(I hope others have had a better experience than me, and I would love to hear your thoughts and tips)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A 🧵 on managing expectations in #academia#highereducation (from my own painfully learnt experiences)
#AcademicTwitter, I accidently deleted my earlier popular pinned thread. I thought it was a good excuse to repost, but with some further reflections (older/wiser?)
These are tips that I wish I had learnt earlier - I hope they help a few of you struggling with the many demands of academic life in long, dragging #pandemic where academic life is increasingly under acute pressure and everything feels extra hard
In the article we examine the pivots to remote hearings our courts have undertaken, and probe the issues of public law and good judicial administration that arise with this shift. We also flag the opportunities for future reform presented by this profound cultural shift
The changes in judicial practices in the last 6 months have been profound - and there are as many challenges ahead as there are opportunities that have been created. This is a needed conversation for all those with an interest in judicial studies, practice and administration.
THREAD ON HIGHER ED: This wonderful article by Lynda Ng is a must read for anyone working in (or interested in) higher education in Australia. It exposes the fundamental misconceptions that have plauged the corporatisation of our Universites.
I look forward to hearing @AmeliaLoughland response to this - what a great thing for the work of young graduate to invite such a detailed response from leaders in empirical judicial studies t
This type of scholarship is still new in Australia, and we are still probing out the uses and limits of it. However, like all legal scholarship it should be discursive. The debate is enriched by disagreement and counter analysis
There appear to be methodological differences between the two studies- though this needs to be unpacked. It seems that most of the concern with loughland piece is that the sample was unrepresentative and that propositions went beyond the data.
Great #proudson moment today. My Dad is appearing in the @HighCourtofAus in the important native title case NLC v Quall - concerning native title, improper delegation and representative governance.
This cases has been a long fight for important principles of properly engaging traditional owners in decisions directly affecting their right.