1. THE GOLDFISH

I’m collating information and evidence for a *thing* and thought it might be worth revisiting @CMO_England Professor Whitty’s evidence to the Commons select committee on 4th March. Here he is acknowledging the airborne nature of the virus.
2. Here he is talking about seasonality and how transmission might naturally fall over summer.
3. I think there might be another seasonal component, but we’ll have to wait and see if this hypothesis is correct.
4. Just in case there was any doubt, Professor Whitty makes it clear that environmental airborne exposure is an important mode of transmission.
5. This clip is absolutely staggering, and I remember being aghast at the time. This explains why the UK got it so wrong. Basic policy was intervention as late as possible to minimise economic impact.
6. It goes against all best practice pandemic response, which shows early intervention leads to better health and economic outcomes. @DrMikeRyan sums it up beautifully.
7. I find this one amusing. The presumption that Britain would be in a position to help the international community suggests CMO might have underestimated the threat. And the comment about international variations just makes me think about the UK’s aversion to masks.
8. This clip made me wonder about the critical thinking involved in planning the UK’s response. Here the CMO notes the unusual biphasic disease presentation in the minority of acute cases. Anomalies can tell us a great deal about common occurrences.
9. A disease that is unusual in having a second more severe phase could have some mechanism for persistence or reactivation, and if more attention had been paid to this, Long Covid might have been recognised sooner rather than later.
10. The natural follow-up question is if there is a mechanism for persistence in the bone marrow, central nervous system or other organs, what are the long-term health implications and economic and social cost of such widespread transmission?
11. Why the Goldfish?

Goldfish are reputed to have bad memories. In the stress and turmoil of the past few months, the government might be expecting us to forget things.
12. We were told schools would not reopen if there was widespread community transmission. Since they have and there is, and the CMO has known this is an airborne, respiratory virus since March, why isn’t there a masks mandate for schools?
13. France, Spain, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan and many other countries have implemented a masks for all policy in schools. The government’s scientific advisers have recommended this measure, as has the @WHO
14. Once again, British exceptionalism is likely to lead us down a dark path. It is important we remember this is an airborne, respiratory virus. The weight of scientific opinion tells us children should be wearing masks in school.
15. We are not following the scientific advice or other advanced economies by packing our classrooms with children who aren’t wearing masks. If health is the economy, we are currently placing ourselves at a strategic economic disadvantage.
16. I’m reminded of February in calling for the government to take early precautionary action. Wait and see doesn’t work during a pandemic, but as the clip above suggests, this slowness has been at the heart of the government’s response since the start.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Hamdy

Adam Hamdy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamhamdy

6 Sep
1. THE FROG

Back in February, I said I expected we’d see reinfection and long term complications from #COVID19

‘Mildly hysterical’ was a criticism of my remarks at the time. The UK government and WHO were saying most people would clear infection in 14 days.
2. Now we know about Long Covid. What started as something that affects 1 in 20, now seems to affect more. Possibly 50% of those infected by #Covid19. Privately epidemiologists have expressed concern the percentage could be higher.
3. @Dr2NisreenAlwan is absolutely right. We can’t measure what we don’t count. We need to count #LongCovid in order to truly understand the risks of #COVID19
Read 18 tweets
2 Sep
1. I've been tweeting about airborne transmission of #COVID19 in schools, and thought it might be helpful to share how we've dealt with the issue. Every family is different, so what we've done might not work for all.
2. We're in this strange Orwellian world in which it is widely accepted #SARSCoV2 is airborne/aerosolised, but the UK government's guidance to schools is based on close contact and fomite transmission.
3. Our local authority and schools have been effective at communicating their risk assessments, but airborne transmission is not mentioned once. When questioned, they point to the Department for Education guidelines, which set out how to open schools safely.
Read 21 tweets
2 Sep
1. I've been thinking about the variables of #COVID19 risk, and how we move beyond the simplistic view of mortality vs survival rates. I've put together a list of things I think we should consider when deciding how to respond to the pandemic.
2. I know people who've experienced diabetes, cardiac, neurological, thyroid and other complications following infection by #SARSCoV2

We need to know what proportion of COVID-19 infections result in complications.
3. We need to understand the severity of these complications.
Read 18 tweets
24 Aug
1. Back in February I highlighted the potential for #SARSCoV2 to cause long term harm. Unfortunately we’ve seen this come to pass in #LongCovid

I also warned about the likelihood of reinfection. We’ve seen many anecdotal reports, but today’s sequences case is the first proof.
2. I’ve spent the last few weeks hammering my head against the general refusal to accept airborne transmission and transmission by children. What’s happening in schools in Germany and Scotland should put an end to the debate.
3. If children don’t wear masks in English schools, we will lose our tenuous grip on transmission at the worst possible time - heading into the winter cold and flu season.
Read 8 tweets
19 Aug
1. We generally assume two things of government: competence and benevolence. What happens when we get a government that exhibits little of either? Let's take an issue I've been flogging recently; the opening of schools.
2. In the event of a pandemic, a competent government commissions independent scientific research into risks and how to minimise them. The Johnson government has done this, and both sets of scientific advisers have recommended wearing masks in schools.

3. A competent, benevolent government would seek to minimise harm and implement a relatively simple precautionary measure to protect public health. Political pressure from the right wing of the party means this government isn't following the scientific advice.
Read 18 tweets
16 Aug
1. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, after today's thread on airborne transmission and schools, I thought it would be worth looking at the government's own advice on aerosols.

2. The advice (published on Aug 7th) can be found here, and it says:

"Aerosol transmission can occur when small respiratory aerosols (<10 um diameter) containing the virus remain in the air and can be inhaled by another person."

gov.uk/government/pub…
3. "This is most likely to happen at close range (within 2m) though there is a small amount of evidence that this could happen in an indoor environment more than 2m from an infected person."

The latest evidence suggests it can happen at a distance greater than 2m indoors.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!