I want to lose that final 25 pounds because 1) I want to look better and eliminate a MetS factor (waistline), and 2) HBP.
Maybe if I share publicly, I'll be less likely to bail out and fail to reach my target weight. First some background, then the plan.
A THREAD
Well, I'm quite fat-adapted now which is a big advantage compared to every other time I calorie-restricted using a low fat diet (which started in junior high!) to lose weight.
After 6 years of LC/ZC I have found I can't eat until I'm full, no matter what fat:protein ratio I
use, or in what order I eat the fat and protein. I don't "count calories," but I do have to portion control or I'll eat too much. I'll always want to eat more. I think I'm still hung over from years of being so hungry while dieting on low-fat (and even when I'm not)
that I'm afraid of being hungry later and will eat while I can. It is easier to eat less if what I eat is LC/ZC because I don't experience the intense sugar crash hunger.
My weight has never leveled. Instead, it dropped quickly and steadily when I first started LC, then rose
when I tried "eating until full" or not counting calories (in the form a portion measuring) or eating OMAD (oh, if I can't eat again today I better eat a little extra). I weigh every morning, but record only weekly.
It took a year to drop from 256 to 185. Since then, for about
5 years now, I've been up and down sharply, between 200 and 158 lbs. It's a struggle to get down to and remain below ~185 lbs (which interestingly is where I first landed, see the image).
PLAN: It may be a bit of a mind screw, but rather than FAST when weight is ABOVE a target,
I'm going to alternate a total (coffee only) fast day with a normal EAT day (beef, up to 32oz, ~900g), eating only when weight is at or BELOW a TARGET weight. For maintenance, that target will be fixed. Hopefully the BP and waistline will cooperate. During the loss phase,
I will LOWER the target weight by one pound every 5 days.
It's working pretty well so far, since 23 August, I'm down 7 lbs. And I have a plan.
To summarize: I set a target weight 1 lb lower than current weight, and I lower that target by 1 lb every 5 days. I'll eat (up to)
a normal day's beef ration when at or under the target weight. I'll fast totally (coffee only) when above.
So far, the longest fast has only been ~48 hours. I'll fast longer if needed.
I hope to maintain weight by eating two days out of three, or maybe every other day.
During the weight loss phase, I'll probably eat every other or every third day.
Last, I find a total fast day easier than a "mimicking" day where I have, say, 600 calories of beef.
I look forward to a level 160 lbs someday, 32" waist, no Rx for HTN.
So far, so good. Yesterday morning weight was 1lb above goal weight, so I intended to fast. Experienced real hunger in the late morning, so I fixed 4 eggs. Intense hunger continued so in the early afternoon I fixed 10 oz dog food†. Able to quell hunger.
Body was talking to me so I listened. I figured today would be another fast day. But that was OK. Working with internal signals over emotions and the clock and the scale. This morning, 1/4 lb UNDER goal weight. So I could eat today if I need to. We'll see. Turns out …
reducing target weight one pound every 5 days is 1.4 lb/week, which is quite doable. Here's the daily progress so far:
†I feed the dogs, in part, 90/10 ground beef, which is always available and isn't frozen solid.😑
The #GatedEating (mistagged prior, rather focus on eating than fasting) going remarkably well. Averaging 1.8 lb/wk loss. Hunger abated: Twice now I haven't eaten a full ration on a day that I could have because I just didn't get hungry enough to do so.
For people worried about cholesterol, we have added a table showing the cholesterol content of foods. This will enable you to plan menus which are low in both carbohydrates and cholesterol.
[Even then, they knew … Also, no mention of smoking cessation.]
🚨To emphasize just how agreeable a low-carbohydrate diet can be, just consider the discomforts of its only alternative, the low-calorie diet.
Page 7
🚨You will be eating satisfying meals. Pangs of hunger won't be making you nervous in the middle of the afternoon.
The ADA exists to encourage you to become and remain diabetic. The ADA's sponsors (companies that sell processed food and medications to lower blood sugar) pay them for this, not to make/keep you well. The AHA works the same for CVD. The sooner you understand that, the better.
The same can be said for nutritionist and dietitian programs. Look who sponsors the learning materials, conferences, swag bags, CE courses. Ask an RD/Nutritionist how many carbs one must eat every day. Then ask them how they know this. It's what they are told. In class. By these:
I hear conversations. Unsuspecting, ill, overweight people being told how much carb to have with every meal. To finger stick to be sure they shouldn't up the insulin. A lady tears and says her insulin is too expensive. Provider says there are programs to help pay for insulin. 1/
@angryhacademic Seeking long term studies of ACM/MM of #LCHF diets asks the wrong question, and wouldn't likely ever be done anyway. What would the control arm be, and how would you ever isolate just a single dietary (macro?) difference? The question to ask is given someone is not healthy as 1/
@angryhacademic are 80%+ of the adult population (e.g., poor bio-markers, low QoL measures, presence of multiple chronic disease dx), do they improve on #LCHF/#ZC intervention? That does happen. As an aside, there are some longer term carnivores around who despite consuming no fiber, fruits, 2/
@angryhacademic veg for many years are thriving—no signs of survey or GI problems. The evidence is out there if you look for it. But since this would never be a pharmaCo drug intervention, there wouldn't be an RCT because there's no money in it. Last, I don't think many claim ↑LDL is 3/
A thread on two diets with differences in WHAT and WHEN to eat.
Low-fat, three meals plus snacks (my HistoricDiet™)
vs
Low-carb, 4 hour TRF (time restricted feeding)
There is a lot of chatter on social media debating whether a low-carb/keto diet can improve health, and perhaps prevent certain disease. Much of this chatter turns out to be covert vegan disdain for consuming animal products, which confounds any discussion of the real question:
Does consuming less carbohydrate improve health and prevent or reduce the severity of long term chronic disease? We can't really know for sure given the prohibitions against conducting RCTs to find out. IRBs won't approve such trials. Subjects would never actually comply.
I've been #LCHF since 2014, and KetoAF for nearly two years. I am still prone to growing a spare tire and hypertension, two conditions indicative of metabolic syndrome. The other MS markers are good: My blood glucose (90) and TRIGs (60) are lower, and HDL is
higher (62). I've wanted to use a CGM for a while, to track BG on a OMAD KetoAF diet, and to see how adding in some carbs affects BG levels. I assumed BG would rise after eating, the question is how far and for how long? Then, during a carbohydrate assault, how far and for
how long does BG rise? I'm also interested in the theory that abstaining chronically from all but 20g carbohydrate per day, I've become psychologically insulin resistant and somewhat unable to handle carbs (as @CarnivoreMD suggests). The second question: Does introducing a