Here we go again...
gov.uk/government/new…
(Noting that a #SingleSignOn is not *necessarily* an '#identity' - that depends on a whole range of things, such as what is added or linked to this "#GOVUKaccount", and how they/it is #verified...)
gov.uk/government/new…
(Noting that a #SingleSignOn is not *necessarily* an '#identity' - that depends on a whole range of things, such as what is added or linked to this "#GOVUKaccount", and how they/it is #verified...)
https://twitter.com/ComputerWeekly/status/1308436623059759104
A blog post from @Jen_Allum, "Introducing #GOVUKaccounts":
gds.blog.gov.uk/2020/09/22/int…
Posing a few questions:
gds.blog.gov.uk/2020/09/22/int…
Posing a few questions:
...so let's take 'em one by one.
1) #Transparency - simple! Data Usage Reports. Every citizen should know how their data is used; if they have a trusted login, you can tell them.
Someone even did a demo for you, FIVE YEARS ago (scroll down):
medconfidential.org/2015/implement…
1) #Transparency - simple! Data Usage Reports. Every citizen should know how their data is used; if they have a trusted login, you can tell them.
Someone even did a demo for you, FIVE YEARS ago (scroll down):
medconfidential.org/2015/implement…
2) #Personal vs #Professional - also simple! Keep 'em separate, cf. #IdentityAssurance Principle 3:
gov.uk/government/upl… #Multiplicity "Citizens can use & choose as many different identifiers [i.e. accounts] as they want." Anything else builds the "#uberCRM" you say you won't.
gov.uk/government/upl… #Multiplicity "Citizens can use & choose as many different identifiers [i.e. accounts] as they want." Anything else builds the "#uberCRM" you say you won't.
3) '#Personalisation' failure - guess what? #Article14 sez assigning people to buckets sucks; citizens aren't customers! In commerce, telling folk what they (don't) want based on others' choices loses you a sale; doing that in Gov't/public services can really screw people over...
...so DON'T! Also, don't do what @DWP does with UC statements (to pick an example). If you present a short 'list' to people, you MUST also make the long/full 'list' available too. Anything else could be #discriminatory, and will certainly seem unfriendly to those denied options.
P.S. one other point on (2), don't forget #DelegatedAuthority; one of the use cases that screwed @GOVUKverify.
And if you want this to genuinely work for people, and across government, you're gonna have to be a whole bunch smarter than @DCMS, who just peed in the 'ID pool' 🤦🏻♂️
And if you want this to genuinely work for people, and across government, you're gonna have to be a whole bunch smarter than @DCMS, who just peed in the 'ID pool' 🤦🏻♂️
I see @govdigerati's taken an interest...
https://twitter.com/govdigerati/status/1308388227854802944?s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
