Every functional society since the dawn of time has had winners and losers, because a society that cannot assign resources and determine winners and losers is one that doesn't have to be obeyed at all, or in other words, one that is extremely likely to fall apart.
"But, like, imagine if everyone just had everything they needed provided to them. Wouldn't it be so peaceful?"
Congratulations. You have just managed to describe Africa, where for many years they got food shipments for everyone but warlords intercepted them.
This naivety is analogous to asking, "Well if historically millions of people died of starvation, wouldn't infinite calories be a paradise?"
Look at modern Americans - hormonally dysfunctional, quarreling about fatphobia, redefining standards for obesity - and tell me.
People are complex.
If lack of X can kill you, that doesn't mean too much X can't kill you in more gruesome ways.
High stakes means people are on the lookout for anything bad.
And honestly, if you get vetoed by one interviewer, you probably didn't vibe with them. That may or may not be "your fault" but you CAN work on being positive and high-energy.
In #biology, anything that increases your odds of offspring is beneficial and anything that decreases it is maladaptive.
The paradigm of "not settling for less" means that most women high earners have a substantially decreased chance of getting married and having kids.
Note that this decreased chance comes about by a variety of mechanisms - time/energy commitment to the business as well as increased standards for men.
The relevance and reasonableness of strategies depend heavily on whether you want to keep the purchasing power of your current dollars within the US, or internationally.
Obviously, in either case you can consider some physical gold and bitcoin.
But physical gold and bitcoin do not generate cash flow. So after that, you have to ask yourself what you believe is a likely scenario of collapse and where you will be standing when it happens.
If you're planning to be in the US the whole time, buying real estate as a performing asset that hedges against inflation works quite well.
If you're planning to leave and go outside the US post-collapse, that's questionable because it's still dollar denominated.
A biologist asked the other day why everyone feels qualified to have opinions on biology and if his is the only field that is treated with this level of contempt.
Since I have talked publicly about #money#mindset for years, I had to laugh.
"Everyone knows what money is" is on the same level of logic as "look, everybody can read and write these days, so anybody can be a writer."
Theoretically this is kind of true, but in reality is it?
If people widely suck at a thing despite having an introduction to it, and don't accomplish their goals, consider that maybe the field actually has some depth beyond the introductory level.
Watching a lot of people flip out at @BrianNiemeier without understanding the issues involved.
Here's the skinny.
1. Brian is known for a controversial test when people act like pundits on what Christianity is or isn't. He asks them to publicly confess faith in Christ.
@BrianNiemeier 2. This is to see if they have skin in the game, because there have been, over the last few hundred years especially, a LOT of bad-faith attempts to redefine or redirect Christianity to serve someone's immediate political goals.
@BrianNiemeier 3. The controversy: the term he uses when he informs someone that he has no desire to continue discussing his faith with someone who comes in bad faith is "witch."
Outside of rural Africa or Indonesia, where you can still be killed for it, "witch" is not really pejorative now.