THREAD on income tax cuts - the govt will trumpet the green column which gives a rolled up figure, but what's really going on is the yellow column is a one-off boost in 2020-21, and pink is the permanent increase.
#auspol #Budget2021
Notice something? Green makes it look like everyone is about $2K better off. Yellow reveals middle income earners are getting a ONE-OFF boost in 2020-21; and PINK shows the RICH are getting the biggest cuts.
#auspol #Budget2021
Why does this happen? Because for people earning $48K-90K the threshold changes only compensates for loss of low to middle income tax offset. So the middle are only ahead in 2020-21 because in that year they get BOTH.
But for people earning $120K plus...they hardly got LMITO, and their tax cut from threshold changes is PERMANENT. They're ahead not just in 2020-21, but every year.
The other secret behind the green column is that 2017-18 is the reference year - before stage one of tax cuts. So they're patting themselves on the back, again, for tax cuts passed last year. Well done everyone.
FULL STORY explaining the income tax cuts #auspol #Budget2021
theguardian.com/australia-news…
And here's @GrogsGamut with the graphs to show who is ACTUALLY better off #auspol #Budget2020
theguardian.com/australia-news…
@GrogsGamut SMH and Oz both have low to middle income earners in the WINNERS column, with no thought to what happens after 2021.
The Oz even more LUDICROUSLY counts high income earners as losers. Wrong.
The PMO points out if LMITO came off, middle income earners would be worse off by $1,080. And in that sense the tax cuts for them are permanent.
But it's not permanently better off compared to 2018-19, it's permanently better off compared to 2017-18. ie, a middle income earner is not going to experience it as a new tax cut, they're going to experience it as a continuation of a past tax cut.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Karp

Paul Karp Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Paul_Karp

5 Aug
So the ASD won't "collect" information but they will help AFP "identify" people (by accessing their information) Hmmmmmmmm...
Seems @annikasmethurst story was RIGHT ALL ALONG, not that it was ever in doubt.
#auspol
@annikasmethurst Smethurst story said there was a push for ASD to get domestic powers. Dutton/Home Affairs denials were always nonsense, claiming that as long as their wasn't a mass information gathering power on all Australians, only on criminal suspects, that somehow made the story wrong.
Of course we'll have to see what actually limits this to identifying people allegedly accessing/distributing child abuse material.
Because most of the powers in the encryption legislation apply to ALL crimes punishable with a sentence of 3+ years in prison.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
Who needs facts? If you had the intuition that BLM protests would cause a spike in cases then there was a spike, QED.
If you hate multiculturalism, blame the Eid dinner.
The world is not an objective reality external to me, the world is only my perception of it, so I can create my own subjective reality with my spidey sense, filter bubble and hostile media.
Lets give the most powerful elective office in the world to a lunatic because it makes great TV. What could go wrong.
Read 4 tweets
4 May
The #COVIDSafe app legislation has landed. It mainly creates offences for stuff govt said would be banned - eg the main offence of collection/use/disclosure by those not conducting contact tracing (pen: 5 years prison, 300 penalty units or both) #auspol #auslaw
There seems to be a very small amount of leeway if the collection is "permitted under an Australian law" - provided info is deleted immediately.
But elsewhere the legislation says it "cancels the effect of a provision of any Australian law" that would permit or require something banned in it.
Read 8 tweets
7 Aug 19
#breaking Michaela Banerji has unanimously lost the High Court case against Comcare on freedom of political communication. Decision upholds decision to sack her and APS code of conduct restricting even private anonymous social media posts. #auspol #auslaw
The majority judgment of Kiefel, Bell Keane and Nettle is based on fact implied freedom doesn't give personal rights, and notes that code of conduct applies to ALL social media posts due to risk of de-anonymisation.
Although majority leaves door ajar for implied freedom to restrict some executive decisions/discretions
Read 7 tweets
10 Sep 18
Roman Quaedvlieg fresh submission: the convo with Dutton's chief of staff DID HAPPEN and he suggests the date discrepancy means there was ANOTHER BRISBANE AIRPORT AU PAIR CASE #auspol #aupair
Quaedvlieg isn't exactly sure when the conversation took place - gives range of October 2015 to end of 2016 #auspol #aupair
Quaedvlieg repeats the "boss's mate" quote and says he thought it strange Dutton's chief of staff would call him for a "low-level transactional issue" #auspol #aupair
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!